BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “section 68”+ Section 144Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi91Mumbai70Chennai62Kolkata24Allahabad21Pune19Bangalore17Jaipur16Lucknow14Indore12Patna11Nagpur10Raipur9Surat9Hyderabad9Chandigarh9Visakhapatnam8Ahmedabad7Agra5Cuttack4Amritsar3Cochin2Karnataka2Rajkot1Orissa1SC1

Key Topics

Section 14816Section 133(6)8Section 44A8Section 194H4Section 201(1)2Section 194J2Section 194C2

JCIT(OSD)(TDS),CIRCLE, PANCHKULA vs. M/S LIBERTY SHOES LTD.,, KARNAL

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 268/CHANDI/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh20 Oct 2021AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri R.L Negiआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 268/Chd/2020 "नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years : 2017-18 Joint Commissioner Of Income M/S Liberty Shoes Ltd., बनाम 13Th Mile Stone, Tax (Osd) (Tds) Circle Aaykar Bhawan, Sector 2 Liberty Puram, G.T. Road, Panchkula Kutail, Karnal Tan No: Rtkl00664G अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

For Appellant: Sh. Satish Kumar Goel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Meenakshi Vohra, Addl. CIT
Section 133A(1)Section 144ASection 194CSection 194HSection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)

144A of the Act for issuing directions. The contention of the assessee company before the Ld. JCIT was that since the payments were made towards incentives to various parties, question of deducting tax at source u/s 194H of the Act does not arise. So far as the deduction of tax u/s 194J of the Act is concerned, the contention

M/S AMAR CONTRUCTION AND ENGINEER ,SANGRUR vs. PCTI, PATIALA

In the result, all the appeals of the respective assessees stands allowed

ITA 479/CHANDI/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh28 Oct 2022AY 2012-13
Section 133(6)Section 148Section 44A

68,578/- being remuneration and interest respectively paid to partners may not be disallowed for the reason that the assessee had failed to provide a copy of partnership deed in this regard. 2.7 In response, it was the assessee’s submission that it had carried out the work as a subcontractor and had filed the return of income u/s 44AD

M/S ADARSH CONSTRUCTIONS AND ENGINEERS,SANGRUR vs. PR.CIT, PATIALA

In the result, all the appeals of the respective assessees stands allowed

ITA 476/CHANDI/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh28 Oct 2022AY 2012-13
Section 133(6)Section 148Section 44A

68,578/- being remuneration and interest respectively paid to partners may not be disallowed for the reason that the assessee had failed to provide a copy of partnership deed in this regard. 2.7 In response, it was the assessee’s submission that it had carried out the work as a subcontractor and had filed the return of income u/s 44AD

M/S HIMALYAN CONSTRUCTION AND ENGINEERS,SANGRUR vs. PCIT, PATIALA

In the result, all the appeals of the respective assessees stands allowed

ITA 478/CHANDI/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh28 Oct 2022AY 2012-13
Section 133(6)Section 148Section 44A

68,578/- being remuneration and interest respectively paid to partners may not be disallowed for the reason that the assessee had failed to provide a copy of partnership deed in this regard. 2.7 In response, it was the assessee’s submission that it had carried out the work as a subcontractor and had filed the return of income u/s 44AD

M/S GANGA CONSTRUCTIONS,SANGURUR vs. PCIT, PATIALA

In the result, all the appeals of the respective assessees stands allowed

ITA 475/CHANDI/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh28 Oct 2022AY 2012-13
Section 133(6)Section 148Section 44A

68,578/- being remuneration and interest respectively paid to partners may not be disallowed for the reason that the assessee had failed to provide a copy of partnership deed in this regard. 2.7 In response, it was the assessee’s submission that it had carried out the work as a subcontractor and had filed the return of income u/s 44AD

M/S AMBEY ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS,NEW DELHI vs. PR.CIT, PATIALA

In the result, all the appeals of the respective assessees stands allowed

ITA 473/CHANDI/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh28 Oct 2022AY 2012-13
Section 133(6)Section 148Section 44A

68,578/- being remuneration and interest respectively paid to partners may not be disallowed for the reason that the assessee had failed to provide a copy of partnership deed in this regard. 2.7 In response, it was the assessee’s submission that it had carried out the work as a subcontractor and had filed the return of income u/s 44AD

M/S ANAND ENGINEERS & CONTRACTORS,SANGURUR vs. PR.CIT, PATIALA

In the result, all the appeals of the respective assessees stands allowed

ITA 477/CHANDI/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh28 Oct 2022AY 2012-13
Section 133(6)Section 148Section 44A

68,578/- being remuneration and interest respectively paid to partners may not be disallowed for the reason that the assessee had failed to provide a copy of partnership deed in this regard. 2.7 In response, it was the assessee’s submission that it had carried out the work as a subcontractor and had filed the return of income u/s 44AD

M/S HIND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERS CONTRCTORS,SANGRUR vs. PR.CIT, PATIALA

In the result, all the appeals of the respective assessees stands allowed

ITA 474/CHANDI/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh28 Oct 2022AY 2012-13
Section 133(6)Section 148Section 44A

68,578/- being remuneration and interest respectively paid to partners may not be disallowed for the reason that the assessee had failed to provide a copy of partnership deed in this regard. 2.7 In response, it was the assessee’s submission that it had carried out the work as a subcontractor and had filed the return of income u/s 44AD

M/S CHENAB CONSTRUCTION,SANGRUR vs. PCIT, PATIALA

In the result, all the appeals of the respective assessees stands allowed

ITA 480/CHANDI/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh28 Oct 2022AY 2012-13
Section 133(6)Section 148Section 44A

68,578/- being remuneration and interest respectively paid to partners may not be disallowed for the reason that the assessee had failed to provide a copy of partnership deed in this regard. 2.7 In response, it was the assessee’s submission that it had carried out the work as a subcontractor and had filed the return of income u/s 44AD