Search: reassessment u/s 147

2 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 234Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai142 Delhi78 Bangalore46 Ahmedabad38 Hyderabad29 Jaipur20 Raipur17 Kolkata10 Rajkot7 Surat4 Chennai3 Guwahati3 Chandigarh2 Patna2 Dehradun2 Varanasi1 Lucknow1 Nagpur1 Pune1 Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 1487 Section 142(1)4 Section 143(3)2 Addition to Income2

IPF VIKRAM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,CHANDIGARH vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE, PANCHKULA, PANCHKULA

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1204/CHANDI/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Dec 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Tejmohan Singh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 148

u/s 143(3) on 29.09.2016 and as such upholding of reopening on wrong facts is illegal, arbitrary and unjustified. 4. Without prejudice to the above, the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) has erred in directing the assessing officer to verify the payment of Rs.18,63,488/- with the due dates of the Employees contribution on the basis of decision

PAWAN GARG,PANCHKULA vs. ITO WARD 5((5) CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed