BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

15 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 155clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi322Mumbai141Jaipur106Chennai88Ahmedabad75Bangalore70Raipur36Allahabad30Lucknow24Telangana24Kolkata24Pune21Nagpur17Hyderabad16Cuttack15Chandigarh15Rajkot11Amritsar10Cochin9Surat8Indore8Guwahati5Patna3Visakhapatnam2Jodhpur2Karnataka2Orissa2Panaji2Varanasi2SC1Jabalpur1Dehradun1Uttarakhand1Agra1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 13(3)24Section 14710Exemption8Section 143(3)7Section 234B7Section 2635Addition to Income5Section 1434Section 148

SATISH KATOCH,PALAMPUR vs. ITO, PALAMPUR

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 298/CHANDI/2017[2000-01]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh26 Nov 2018AY 2000-01

Bench: The A.O. U/S 154 Of The Act Against

For Appellant: None(Written submission)For Respondent: Shri Manjit Singh, Sr.DR
Section 140ASection 143Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153ASection 154Section 208Section 210

155 (Del)(TM) (supra); (supra); (supra) and CIT v. Hyundai Heavy Industries Co. Ltd. (Uttaranchal). If the circumstances were such that if the assessee had taken due care and diligence, assessee would not have defaulted in making advance tax under Section 206 or the payment of advance tax would not have fallen 90 per cent of the assessed

3
Section 153A3
Reassessment3
Limitation/Time-bar2

ACIT, CIRCLE 1(1), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S SML ISUZU LTD., CHANDIGARH

ITA 644/CHANDI/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh18 Sept 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Jain, Advocate and Ms. Somya Jain, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 253Section 3

147 of the Act, by preferring an appeal before CIT(A). The CIT(A) by the “impugned order” dt. 27/07/2022 however quashed the reassessment proceedings as being bad in law and not sustainable. Since the reassessment proceedings itself was quashed, no specific finding was rendered by the CIT(A) on merits on the issue of disallowance of claim

DCIT, C-1(1) , CHANDIGARH vs. M/S FIDELITY INFORMATION SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD., CHANDIGARH

In the result, the cross-objection filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1328/CHANDI/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh07 Jun 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Kalra, Advocate and Ms. Sumisha, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Sharma, CIT DR
Section 37(1)

155 or section 250 or section 254 or section 260 or section 262 or section 263 or section 264, the amount on which interest was payable under sub-section (1) or sub-section (3) has been increased or reduced, as the case may be, the interest shall be increased or reduced accordingly, and- - In a case where the interest

M/S INTERNATIONAL CUSTOMER RELATED MANAGEMENT SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,CHANDIGARH vs. D.C.I.T., CIRCLE 6(1), MOHALI

In the result, for statistical purposes, the appeal is

ITA 436/CHANDI/2022[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh01 Feb 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: SHRI A.D.JAIN (Vice President), SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr.Advocate with Shri Hardeep Singh Chawla, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Sharma, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 153(2)

reassessment proceedings under section 147 of the Act having being initiated merely on the basis of information received, without independent application of mind by the assessing officer to such information and forming opinion thereof, is illegal and bad in law. 4.4. That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the assessing officer erred in making additions

SCOTT EDIL PHARMACIA LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH

ITA 829/CHANDI/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh03 Mar 2025AY 2013-14
Section 132Section 153A

reassess the income of the\nother person in accordance with the provisions of section 153A, if, that Assessing Officer\nis satisfied that the books of account or documents or assets seized or requisitioned have\na bearing on the determination of the total income of such other person for six assessment\nyears immediately preceding the assessment year relevant to the previous

SHRI RAKESH KUMAR KATARIA,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT-CC-1, CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal is allowed as indicated

ITA 159/CHANDI/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh15 Apr 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Shri Vikram Singh Yadavआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 159/Chd/2020 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13 Shri Rakesh Kumar Kataria Vs. The Dcit, Central Circle, बनाम Chandigarh Sco 862, Prop. Subhinfra, Ist Floor, Nac, Manimajra, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aespk5238A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Sh. Parikshit Aggarwal, Ca राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue By : Shri Dharamvir, Jcit, Sr. Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 05.03.2024 उदघोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 15.04.2024 आदेश/Order

For Appellant: Sh. Parikshit Aggarwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Dharamvir, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 132Section 132ASection 143(3)Section 153C

reassessment, if any, has been made. 5.2 The ld. DR has further contended that in this case, the Assessee filed his return of income on 18.03.2013 and notice u/s 143(2) of the Act was issued on 07.08.2013, and that therefore, notice u/s 153C of the Act was neither called for, nor issued. 5.3 The ld. DR has further contended

VANEET GUPTA, S.O. SH. CHATTUR BHUJ GUPTA, #214, SECTOR-06,PANCHKULA vs. PCIT PANCHKULA JURISDICTIONAL ASSESSING OFFICER ITO WARD 5, PANCHKULA , PANCHKULA

In the result, Assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 560/CHANDI/2024[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh20 Jan 2025AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Dr Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 560/Chd/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Vaneet Gupta, Vs. The Ito, बनाम S.O. Shri Chattur Bhuj Ward 5, Gupta, Panchkula # 214, Sector 6, Panchkula "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aphpg0692N अपीलाथ"/ Appellant ""यथ"/ Repsondent ( Hybrid Hearing ) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Sudhir Sehgal, Advocate राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue By : Smt. Kusum Bansal, Cit Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 04.12.2024 उदघोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 20.01.2025 आदेश/Order Per Krinwant Sahay, A.M.:

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 263

147 of the income tax, dated 24.10.2018 and holding the same as erroneous, in so far as, prejudicial to the interest of revenue. 2. That the Ld. PCIT has failed to appreciate that the assessment was framed by the Ld. Assessing Officer vide order, dated 24.10.2018 after due application of mind relating to investment in immoveable property and also credits

M/S MANAV MANGAL SOCIETY,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the department are dismissed

ITA 2/CHANDI/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 May 2021AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Dahiya, CIT-DR
Section 13(3)

155 7,42,699 89,137 (13.63 %) Manchanda (26.31 %) 86,98,99 0/- 1,08,24, 358/- 21,25,368/- 1,43,37,0 83/- 35,12,725/- (32.45 %) Total (24.44 %) The above mentioned chart clearly shows that there is huge increasing into the salary from A.Y. 2011-12 to 2012-13 and 2012-13 to 2013-14. The percentage

DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S MANAV MANGAL SOCIETY, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the department are dismissed

ITA 136/CHANDI/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 May 2021AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Dahiya, CIT-DR
Section 13(3)

155 7,42,699 89,137 (13.63 %) Manchanda (26.31 %) 86,98,99 0/- 1,08,24, 358/- 21,25,368/- 1,43,37,0 83/- 35,12,725/- (32.45 %) Total (24.44 %) The above mentioned chart clearly shows that there is huge increasing into the salary from A.Y. 2011-12 to 2012-13 and 2012-13 to 2013-14. The percentage

DCIT,CIRCLE-1(EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S MANAV MANGAL SCHOOL( MANAV MANGAL SOCIETY), CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the department are dismissed

ITA 27/CHANDI/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 May 2021AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Dahiya, CIT-DR
Section 13(3)

155 7,42,699 89,137 (13.63 %) Manchanda (26.31 %) 86,98,99 0/- 1,08,24, 358/- 21,25,368/- 1,43,37,0 83/- 35,12,725/- (32.45 %) Total (24.44 %) The above mentioned chart clearly shows that there is huge increasing into the salary from A.Y. 2011-12 to 2012-13 and 2012-13 to 2013-14. The percentage

DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S MANAV MANGAL SOCIETY, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the department are dismissed

ITA 30/CHANDI/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 May 2021AY 2016-17
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Dahiya, CIT-DR
Section 13(3)

155 7,42,699 89,137 (13.63 %) Manchanda (26.31 %) 86,98,99 0/- 1,08,24, 358/- 21,25,368/- 1,43,37,0 83/- 35,12,725/- (32.45 %) Total (24.44 %) The above mentioned chart clearly shows that there is huge increasing into the salary from A.Y. 2011-12 to 2012-13 and 2012-13 to 2013-14. The percentage

M/S MANAV MANGAL SOCIETY,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the department are dismissed

ITA 3/CHANDI/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 May 2021AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Dahiya, CIT-DR
Section 13(3)

155 7,42,699 89,137 (13.63 %) Manchanda (26.31 %) 86,98,99 0/- 1,08,24, 358/- 21,25,368/- 1,43,37,0 83/- 35,12,725/- (32.45 %) Total (24.44 %) The above mentioned chart clearly shows that there is huge increasing into the salary from A.Y. 2011-12 to 2012-13 and 2012-13 to 2013-14. The percentage

DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S MANAV MANGAL SOCIETY, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the department are dismissed

ITA 29/CHANDI/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 May 2021AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Dahiya, CIT-DR
Section 13(3)

155 7,42,699 89,137 (13.63 %) Manchanda (26.31 %) 86,98,99 0/- 1,08,24, 358/- 21,25,368/- 1,43,37,0 83/- 35,12,725/- (32.45 %) Total (24.44 %) The above mentioned chart clearly shows that there is huge increasing into the salary from A.Y. 2011-12 to 2012-13 and 2012-13 to 2013-14. The percentage

DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S MANAV MANGAL SOCIETY, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the department are dismissed

ITA 137/CHANDI/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 May 2021AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Dahiya, CIT-DR
Section 13(3)

155 7,42,699 89,137 (13.63 %) Manchanda (26.31 %) 86,98,99 0/- 1,08,24, 358/- 21,25,368/- 1,43,37,0 83/- 35,12,725/- (32.45 %) Total (24.44 %) The above mentioned chart clearly shows that there is huge increasing into the salary from A.Y. 2011-12 to 2012-13 and 2012-13 to 2013-14. The percentage

DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S MANAV MANGAL SOCIETY, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the department are dismissed

ITA 28/CHANDI/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 May 2021AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Dahiya, CIT-DR
Section 13(3)

155 7,42,699 89,137 (13.63 %) Manchanda (26.31 %) 86,98,99 0/- 1,08,24, 358/- 21,25,368/- 1,43,37,0 83/- 35,12,725/- (32.45 %) Total (24.44 %) The above mentioned chart clearly shows that there is huge increasing into the salary from A.Y. 2011-12 to 2012-13 and 2012-13 to 2013-14. The percentage