BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

26 results for “reassessment”+ Section 80Gclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai89Bangalore30Delhi26Chandigarh26Chennai24Lucknow20Ahmedabad17Kolkata14Hyderabad14Jaipur12Cuttack7Indore7Pune4Amritsar4Rajkot4Raipur3Visakhapatnam3Ranchi2Cochin2Jodhpur1SC1

Key Topics

Section 13(3)24TDS17Exemption9Section 80G2

DCIT, TDS, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PUNJAB STATE CIVIL SUPPLY CORPN. LTD., SIRHIND

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 320/CHANDI/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

reassessed to ensure that he millers do not reap undue benefit at the cost of Government of India leading to non-deduction of subsidy on this account. The Ld. DR relying on the above observation in the Audit report vehemently stressed that the millers got much more amount for milling purpose in kind, in the shape of value

DCIT, TDS, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PUNJAB STATE GRAINS PROCUREMENT CORP. LTD., PATIALA

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 318/CHANDI/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

reassessed to ensure that he millers do not reap undue benefit at the cost of Government of India leading to non-deduction of subsidy on this account. The Ld. DR relying on the above observation in the Audit report vehemently stressed that the millers got much more amount for milling purpose in kind, in the shape of value

Showing 1–20 of 26 · Page 1 of 2

DCIT (TDS), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PUNJAB STATE GRAINS PROCUREMENT CORP. LTD., FATEHGARH SAHIB

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 317/CHANDI/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

reassessed to ensure that he millers do not reap undue benefit at the cost of Government of India leading to non-deduction of subsidy on this account. The Ld. DR relying on the above observation in the Audit report vehemently stressed that the millers got much more amount for milling purpose in kind, in the shape of value

ITO (TDS-2), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PUNJAB STATE GRAINS PROCUREMENT CORP. LTD., MOHALI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 686/CHANDI/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

reassessed to ensure that he millers do not reap undue benefit at the cost of Government of India leading to non-deduction of subsidy on this account. The Ld. DR relying on the above observation in the Audit report vehemently stressed that the millers got much more amount for milling purpose in kind, in the shape of value

THE PUNJAB STATE COOPERATIVE SUPPLY,ROPAR vs. ACIT, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 669/CHANDI/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

reassessed to ensure that he millers do not reap undue benefit at the cost of Government of India leading to non-deduction of subsidy on this account. The Ld. DR relying on the above observation in the Audit report vehemently stressed that the millers got much more amount for milling purpose in kind, in the shape of value

THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (F&A) (PERSONAL RESPONSIBLE),SHIMLA vs. ITO (TDS), SHIMLA

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 1424/CHANDI/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

reassessed to ensure that he millers do not reap undue benefit at the cost of Government of India leading to non-deduction of subsidy on this account. The Ld. DR relying on the above observation in the Audit report vehemently stressed that the millers got much more amount for milling purpose in kind, in the shape of value

ACIT (TDS), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PUNJAB STATE GRAIN PROCUREMENT CORP. LTD., BARNALA

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 162/CHANDI/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

reassessed to ensure that he millers do not reap undue benefit at the cost of Government of India leading to non-deduction of subsidy on this account. The Ld. DR relying on the above observation in the Audit report vehemently stressed that the millers got much more amount for milling purpose in kind, in the shape of value

ITO (TDS), PATIALA vs. THE DISTT. MANAGER, FATEHGARH SAHIB

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 1310/CHANDI/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

reassessed to ensure that he millers do not reap undue benefit at the cost of Government of India leading to non-deduction of subsidy on this account. The Ld. DR relying on the above observation in the Audit report vehemently stressed that the millers got much more amount for milling purpose in kind, in the shape of value

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S DISTRICT MANAGER PUNJAB,

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 1314/CHANDI/2016[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

reassessed to ensure that he millers do not reap undue benefit at the cost of Government of India leading to non-deduction of subsidy on this account. The Ld. DR relying on the above observation in the Audit report vehemently stressed that the millers got much more amount for milling purpose in kind, in the shape of value

ITO (TDS-2), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PUNJAB STATE GRAINS PROCUREMENT CORP. LTD., MOHALI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 685/CHANDI/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

reassessed to ensure that he millers do not reap undue benefit at the cost of Government of India leading to non-deduction of subsidy on this account. The Ld. DR relying on the above observation in the Audit report vehemently stressed that the millers got much more amount for milling purpose in kind, in the shape of value

ITO, CHANDIGARH vs. THE MANAGER DISTT. OFFICE,, MOHALI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 1241/CHANDI/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

reassessed to ensure that he millers do not reap undue benefit at the cost of Government of India leading to non-deduction of subsidy on this account. The Ld. DR relying on the above observation in the Audit report vehemently stressed that the millers got much more amount for milling purpose in kind, in the shape of value

ITO (TDS), PATIALA vs. THE DISTT. MANAGER, FATEHGARH SAHIB

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 1309/CHANDI/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

reassessed to ensure that he millers do not reap undue benefit at the cost of Government of India leading to non-deduction of subsidy on this account. The Ld. DR relying on the above observation in the Audit report vehemently stressed that the millers got much more amount for milling purpose in kind, in the shape of value

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S DISTRICT MANAGER PUNJAB, SANGRUR

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 1312/CHANDI/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

reassessed to ensure that he millers do not reap undue benefit at the cost of Government of India leading to non-deduction of subsidy on this account. The Ld. DR relying on the above observation in the Audit report vehemently stressed that the millers got much more amount for milling purpose in kind, in the shape of value

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S DISTRICT MANAGER PUNJAB, SANGRUR

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 1313/CHANDI/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

reassessed to ensure that he millers do not reap undue benefit at the cost of Government of India leading to non-deduction of subsidy on this account. The Ld. DR relying on the above observation in the Audit report vehemently stressed that the millers got much more amount for milling purpose in kind, in the shape of value

THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (F&A) (PERSONAL RESPONSIBLE),SHIMLA vs. ITO (TDS), SHIMLA

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 1425/CHANDI/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

reassessed to ensure that he millers do not reap undue benefit at the cost of Government of India leading to non-deduction of subsidy on this account. The Ld. DR relying on the above observation in the Audit report vehemently stressed that the millers got much more amount for milling purpose in kind, in the shape of value

DCIT (TDS), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PUNJAB STATE GRAINS PROCUREMENT CORP. LTD., FATEHGARH SAHIB

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 316/CHANDI/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

reassessed to ensure that he millers do not reap undue benefit at the cost of Government of India leading to non-deduction of subsidy on this account. The Ld. DR relying on the above observation in the Audit report vehemently stressed that the millers got much more amount for milling purpose in kind, in the shape of value

DCIT, TDS, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S PUNJAB STATE GRAINS PROCUREMENT CORP. LTD., PATIALA

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITA

ITA 319/CHANDI/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

reassessed to ensure that he millers do not reap undue benefit at the cost of Government of India leading to non-deduction of subsidy on this account. The Ld. DR relying on the above observation in the Audit report vehemently stressed that the millers got much more amount for milling purpose in kind, in the shape of value

DR PANDHIS SMALL IDEAS GREAT IDEAS TRUST,LUDHIANA vs. CIT EXEMPTIONS CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn

ITA 193/CHANDI/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh13 Sept 2024AY 2024-25

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: None (Withdrawal Application)For Respondent: Smt. Kusum Banasal, CIT, DR
Section 80G

section 80G (5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The issuance of this circular effectively addresses the primary grounds on which the appeal was based. In light of this significant development and the subsequent rectification of the issue that led to the rejection of registration, we have reassessed

DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S MANAV MANGAL SOCIETY, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the department are dismissed

ITA 30/CHANDI/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 May 2021AY 2016-17
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Dahiya, CIT-DR
Section 13(3)

section 13(1)(c) is to judge the reasonableness of the payments made to the members of the society and secondly and more importantly, there is no finding of the AO that the society is not working towards the objects of education etc. as defined in its Memorandum and Rules and Regulations. No case of siphoning off of the funds

M/S MANAV MANGAL SOCIETY,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the department are dismissed

ITA 3/CHANDI/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 May 2021AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Dahiya, CIT-DR
Section 13(3)

section 13(1)(c) is to judge the reasonableness of the payments made to the members of the society and secondly and more importantly, there is no finding of the AO that the society is not working towards the objects of education etc. as defined in its Memorandum and Rules and Regulations. No case of siphoning off of the funds