BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment”+ Section 56(2)(viib)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai53Delhi19Kolkata11Pune8Jaipur5Cuttack4Nagpur4Chennai3Chandigarh2Indore2Jodhpur2Rajkot1Hyderabad1Karnataka1Patna1Bangalore1

Key Topics

Section 26316Section 143(3)5Section 56(2)2Reassessment2Addition to Income2Revision u/s 2632

M/S SRM PORTFOLIOS PVT. LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. PR. CIT(C), GURGAON

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 658/CHANDI/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh24 Feb 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri R.L Negiआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos. 658/Chd/2018 "नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 M/S S.R.M Portfolios Pvt. बनाम The Pcit(C) Ltd. Gurugram Plot No. 781, Industrial Area, Phase Ii, Chandigarh "थायीलेखासं./Pan No: Aajcs1938B अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Hearing Through Video Conferencing "नधा"रतीक"ओरसे/Assessee By : Shri Ved Jain, Advocate & Shri Akshit Goyal, Ca राज"वक"ओरसे/ Revenue By : Shri Sandip Dahiya, Cit सुनवाईक"तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 27/01/2021 उदघोषणाक"तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 24/02/2021 आदेश/Order Per R.L. Negi:

For Appellant: Shri Ved Jain, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri Sandip Dahiya, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263Section 56(2)

56(2) (viib) r.w.s 2(24)(xvi) of the Act. 3. Aggrieved by the impugned order passed by the Ld. PCIT, assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal. 4. The Assessee has challenged the impugned order passed by the Ld. CIT(A) by raising the following grounds of appeal; 1. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the order

DIAMOND HOSIERY MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED,LUDHIANA vs. ITO, WARD -7(1), LUDHIANA

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 363/CHANDI/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI. RAJPAL YADAV (Vice President), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY, AM आयकर अपीलसं . / ITA No.363 /Chd/2022 निर्धारणवर्ष / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Diamond Hosiery Mills Private बनाम The ITO Limited Ward-7(1), 620/8, Kundan Puri, Civil Lines, Ludhiana Ludhiana स्थायीलेखासं./PAN NO: AABCD7485Q अपीलार्थी/Appellant प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent निर्धारिती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, C.A राजस्वकी ओर से / Revenue by : Shri Chandrajit Singh, CIT, DR सुनवाईकीतारीख / Date of Hearing : 20/01/202

For Appellant: Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Chandrajit Singh, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 263(1)

reassessment proceedings that followed, the assessee provided a comprehensive reply to the AO. On examining the matter, the AO accepted the assessee’s explanation regarding the mismatch between the shareholder list and the balance sheet, and acknowledged that it was a clerical error, not warranting any addition. This clearly indicates that the addition contemplated in the original show cause notice