BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 54Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi37Jaipur15Raipur10Indore9Amritsar7Ahmedabad7Chennai6Bangalore5Mumbai4Nagpur4Surat4Dehradun3Chandigarh3Agra2Jodhpur2Pune2Rajkot2Visakhapatnam1Hyderabad1Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 54B18Section 1483Section 1473Section 54F3Capital Gains3Long Term Capital Gains3Exemption3Deduction3Reassessment3Reopening of Assessment

SH. JASMER SINGH S/O SH. JEET SINGH,KURUKSHETRA vs. ITO, KURUKSHETRA

ITA 682/CHANDI/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh07 Aug 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri. B.M. MongaFor Respondent: Shri. Sandeep Dahiya
Section 147Section 148Section 54BSection 54F

section 54B on the ground that the investment in agricultural land has been made in the name of Son (member of HUF) without appreciating the fact that the investment for claiming exemption u/s 54B has been made by appellant (Father) out of sale proceeds of the land. 5. That the Ld. CIT(A) is not justified while upholding the reassessment

SH. GURDEEP SINGH S/O SH. GURBACHAN SINGH,KURUKSHETRA vs. ITO, KURUKSHETRA

3
Disallowance3
Addition to Income3
ITA 679/CHANDI/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh07 Aug 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri. B.M. MongaFor Respondent: Shri. Sandeep Dahiya
Section 147Section 148Section 54BSection 54F

section 54B on the ground that the investment in agricultural land has been made in the name of Son (member of HUF) without appreciating the fact that the investment for claiming exemption u/s 54B has been made by appellant (Father) out of sale proceeds of the land. 5. That the Ld. CIT(A) is not justified while upholding the reassessment

SH. GURMEET SINGH S/O SH. GURBACHAN SINGH,KURUKSHETRA vs. ITO, KURUKSHETRA

ITA 680/CHANDI/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh07 Aug 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri. B.M. MongaFor Respondent: Shri. Sandeep Dahiya
Section 147Section 148Section 54BSection 54F

section 54B on the ground that the investment in agricultural land has been made in the name of Son (member of HUF) without appreciating the fact that the investment for claiming exemption u/s 54B has been made by appellant (Father) out of sale proceeds of the land. 5. That the Ld. CIT(A) is not justified while upholding the reassessment