BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Section 43Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai192Delhi63Chennai36Raipur33Kolkata28Bangalore25Cochin24Jaipur22Hyderabad20Ahmedabad18Pune17Indore14Nagpur13Surat12Cuttack8Lucknow7Visakhapatnam5Chandigarh4Allahabad3Jabalpur3Karnataka2Rajkot1Ranchi1Guwahati1Telangana1Varanasi1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 2637Addition to Income4Section 1473Section 1443Section 145A3Section 139(1)2Section 24(1)2Section 1482House Property2

ANITA RANI W/O SH. RAJENDER SINGH,CHEEKA GUHLA, KAITHAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1,, KAITHAL

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 781/CHANDI/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh19 Nov 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Navdeep Monga, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Prem Singh, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 148Section 234ASection 250Section 69

43B Ward-6, Anaj Mandi, Haryana Cheeka Guhla, Kaithal-136034, Haryana "ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: BYUPR6769J अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Navdeep Monga, Advocate राज" की ओर से/ Revenue by : Shri Prem Singh, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 19/11/2025 उदघोषणा की तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 20/11/2025 आदेश

Deduction2
Limitation/Time-bar2

ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, C-4(1), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S SML ISUZU LIMITED, CHANDIGARH

In the result of the value of the opening stock and closing stock

ITA 441/CHANDI/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh03 Oct 2018AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri Neeraj JainFor Respondent: Mrs. Mona Mohanty, CIT-DR
Section 145Section 145ASection 271

reassessed after loading the element of excise duty at the prevalent rate. Therefore, taking into account the foregoing discussion and in keeping with judicial consistency, the income of the assessee is hereby increased by an amount of Rs. 1,74,99,101/- on account of under valuation of closing Work in progress. Since the assessee has concealed the particulars

MAHAKALI DEVELOPERS AND RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITES,SCF , IST FLOOR vs. PCIT PATIALA, AAYKAR BHAWAN PATIALA

The appeals are allowed

ITA 294/CHANDI/2024[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh24 Feb 2025AY 2013-2014
For Appellant: \nShri Ashok Goel, CAFor Respondent: \nSmt. Kusum Bansal, CIT, DR
Section 139(1)Section 144Section 147Section 24(1)Section 263

43B of the act. Hence the sum of Rs.\n1,61,59,000/- has escaped assessment.\nOn the strength of these reasons, ld. Counsel for the\nassessee submitted that since no addition was made for the\nreason\nassessments were reopened, therefore, ld. CIT(A)\ncannot count the limitation from the re-assessment orders\nfor taking action under Section

MAHAKALI DEVELOPERS AND RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,SCF vs. PCIT PATIALA, AAYKAR BHAWAN

Appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 295/CHANDI/2024[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh24 Feb 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahay

For Appellant: Shri Ashok Goel, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT, DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 24Section 24(1)Section 263

43B of the act. Hence the sum of Rs. 1,61,59,000/- has escaped assessment. 5. On the strength of these reasons, ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that since no addition was made for the reason assessments were reopened, therefore, ld. CIT(A) cannot count the limitation from the re-assessment orders ITA No.294 & 295/CHD/2024 A.Y.2013-14