AMARJIT SINGH,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 6(1) LUDHIANA, LUDHIANA
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 1171/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh29 Jul 2025AY 2017-18
Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY, AM आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 1171 /Chd/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Shri Amarjit Singh बनाम The ITO C/o V V Bhalla & Company Ward 6(1) SCF-39, Rishi Nagar Main Market, Ludhiana Adjoining Subway, Ludhiana-141001, Punjab स्थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: ABTPS8558B अपीलार्थी/Appellant प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent निर्धारिती की ओर से / Assessee by : Shri Pankaj Bhalla, C.A राजस्व की ओर से/ Revenue by : Shri Vivek Vardhan, Addl. CIT, Sr
For Appellant: Shri Pankaj Bhalla, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 144ASection 147Section 148Section 151Section 250Section 250(6)Section 270A
35. It was contended that such non-service of notice constituted a violation of the principles of natural justice and deprived the assessee of an effective opportunity to present his case. The Ld. AR further submitted that the reassessment proceedings initiated under section
