SAWASTIKA PRINTING & PACKAGING,KALA MAB vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, NAHAN
In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 1222/CHANDI/2025[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh09 Mar 2026AY 2017-2018
Bench: the Hon'ble CIT(A)(NFAC) that assessee is having business turnover of Rs 16,77,30,943/-. While upholding the additions of Rs 20,81,000/- the Hon'ble CIT(A) (NFAC) has observed in last para of his order as under:-
For Appellant: Shri Yad Ram Saini, Advocate and Shri Neeraj Jain, C.AFor Respondent: Dr. Ranjit Kaur, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR (Virtual Mode)
Section 132Section 139(4)Section 144Section 147
270A and 271B were also initiated for under-reporting of income and delay in filing the tax audit report.
4. Against the order of the AO the assessee went in appeal before the Ld.
CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A), after carefully considering the assessment order, submissions of the appellant, remand report of the Assessing Officer, rejoinder filed
