SAWASTIKA PRINTING & PACKAGING,KALA MAB vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, NAHAN
In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 1222/CHANDI/2025[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh09 Mar 2026AY 2017-2018
Bench: the Hon'ble CIT(A)(NFAC) that assessee is having business turnover of Rs 16,77,30,943/-. While upholding the additions of Rs 20,81,000/- the Hon'ble CIT(A) (NFAC) has observed in last para of his order as under:-
For Appellant: Shri Yad Ram Saini, Advocate and Shri Neeraj Jain, C.AFor Respondent: Dr. Ranjit Kaur, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR (Virtual Mode)
Section 132Section 139(4)Section 144Section 147
3. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the assessee engaged in the business of manufacturing corrugated boxes and gas cylinders and filed its return of income for the Assessment Year 2017-18 under section 139(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on 15.01.2018 declaring a total income of Rs.1,80,770/-.
Subsequently, based on information received
