JASWINDER SINGH GREWAL,PUNJAB vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(1), CHANDIGARH
In the result, appeal of the Assessee is dismissed
ITA 968/CHANDI/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh12 Mar 2026AY 2013-14
Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 968/Chd/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 Jaswinder Singh Grewal, The Ito, H. No. 569, Phase Iiia, बनाम Ward 6(1), Mohali 160053 Chandigarh Vs. "थायी लेखा सं./ Pan No: Ajwpg9873E अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent
For Appellant: Sh. Parikshit Aggarwal, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Vivek Vardhan, Addl. CIT
Section 115BSection 144Section 147Section 148Section 251Section 69A
reassessment order deserves to be quashed since the reasons recorded before issuing notice u/s 148 were factually incorrect and the amount of unexplained credit in reasons recorded of Rs.
23,82,27,255/- are vague and ambiguous and were not at all related to the assessee.
4. That on facts, circumstances and legal position of the case, Worthy