BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Section 245Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai45Hyderabad43Delhi34Chennai20Allahabad16Pune11Indore10Cochin7Visakhapatnam5Jaipur5Bangalore4Kolkata4Chandigarh4SC3Ahmedabad1Lucknow1Surat1Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 245D9Addition to Income4Section 245H3Section 143(2)3Section 143(3)3Section 245C3Section 245D(1)3Section 23Section 133A2

DCIT, CIRCLE, MANDI GOBINGARH vs. SH. GURINDERJIT SINGH, SIRHIND

The appeals of the Revenue is allowed whereas Cross

ITA 1271/CHANDI/2017[1994-95]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh29 Aug 2018AY 1994-95

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri. Prem SinghFor Respondent: Shri. Manoj Kumar
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2Section 245CSection 245DSection 245D(1)Section 245H

reassessment under subsection (2), the period commencing on and from the date of the application to the Settlement Commission under section 245C

ITO, WARD, SIRHIND vs. SH. HARJIT SINGH, SIRHIND

The appeals of the Revenue is allowed whereas Cross

ITA 1292/CHANDI/2017[1996-97]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh29 Aug 2018AY 1996-97

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri. Prem SinghFor Respondent: Shri. Manoj Kumar
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2Section 245CSection 245DSection 245D(1)Section 245H

reassessment under subsection (2), the period commencing on and from the date of the application to the Settlement Commission under section 245C

ITO, WARD, SIRHIND vs. SH. KESAR SINGH, SIRHIND

The appeals of the Revenue is allowed whereas Cross

ITA 1287/CHANDI/2017[1996-97]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh29 Aug 2018AY 1996-97

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri. Prem SinghFor Respondent: Shri. Manoj Kumar
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2Section 245CSection 245DSection 245D(1)Section 245H

reassessment under subsection (2), the period commencing on and from the date of the application to the Settlement Commission under section 245C

G.J. HOLDING PVT. LTD.,LUDHIANA vs. ACIT, C-2, LUDHIANA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1171/CHANDI/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Jan 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Vikram Singh Yadavआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.1171/Chandi/2019 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 G.J. Holding Pvt. Ltd. बनाम Acit, Central Circle-Ii, Ludhiana C/O G.S. Auto International Limited, G.S. Estate, G.T. Road, Ludhiana. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aaacg6664K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent िनधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri P.K. Goel & Sunil Arora, C.As राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue By : Smt. Amanpreet Kaur, Sr. Dr सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 18.12.2023 उदघोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 30.01.2024 आदेश/Order Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 04.07.2019 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-5, Ludhiana[Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). The Assessee In This Appeal Has Taken The Following 2. Grounds Of Appeal:

For Appellant: Shri P.K. Goel & Sunil Arora, C.AsFor Respondent: Smt. Amanpreet Kaur, Sr. DR
Section 132Section 133ASection 139Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 250

section 148. There are serious factual errors inasmuch as Sh. Jasbir Singh Ryait, who is promoter/director of the company and are being assessed to Income Tax under your jurisdiction and who also made an application U/s 245C before Settlement Commission for the Asstt. Years 2009- 2010 to 2015-2016 is described as paper entity having doubtful, creditworthiness and genuineness