BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “reassessment”+ Section 144Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi86Chennai49Mumbai23Allahabad22Hyderabad19Patna16Bangalore15Kolkata13Jaipur13Pune9Chandigarh8Amritsar7Raipur7Indore6Lucknow5Nagpur3Agra3SC2Orissa2Panaji1Karnataka1Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 153A18Section 153D18Section 143(3)12Section 13212Section 14810Addition to Income8Section 139(5)6Section 80I6Section 143(2)6

AMARJIT SINGH,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 6(1) LUDHIANA, LUDHIANA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1171/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh29 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY, AM आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 1171 /Chd/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Shri Amarjit Singh बनाम The ITO C/o V V Bhalla & Company Ward 6(1) SCF-39, Rishi Nagar Main Market, Ludhiana Adjoining Subway, Ludhiana-141001, Punjab स्थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: ABTPS8558B अपीलार्थी/Appellant प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent निर्धारिती की ओर से / Assessee by : Shri Pankaj Bhalla, C.A राजस्व की ओर से/ Revenue by : Shri Vivek Vardhan, Addl. CIT, Sr

For Appellant: Shri Pankaj Bhalla, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 144ASection 147Section 148Section 151Section 250Section 250(6)Section 270A
Deduction6

reassessment proceedings under section 148 read with section 144A, and defective approval under section 151. The assessee also disputed the addition

S. P. SINGLA CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED ,NEW DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed whereas the stay applications are dismissed

ITA 145/CHANDI/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh17 Jan 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Dr Krinwant Sahay

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 139(5)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 80I

144A of the Act should be given by the Range Head. Para 3.2 The final show cause notice should be prepared in consultation with the Addl. CIT. 38.7 In view of the above the allegation of the appellant that the approval was a mechanical exercise without application of mind on his part is not correct as in Central Charges

S. P. SINGLA CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed whereas the stay applications are dismissed

ITA 141/CHANDI/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh17 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Dr Krinwant Sahay

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 139(5)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 80I

144A of the Act should be given by the Range Head. Para 3.2 The final show cause notice should be prepared in consultation with the Addl. CIT. 38.7 In view of the above the allegation of the appellant that the approval was a mechanical exercise without application of mind on his part is not correct as in Central Charges

S. P. SINGLA CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed whereas the stay applications are dismissed

ITA 143/CHANDI/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh17 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Dr Krinwant Sahay

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 139(5)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 80I

144A of the Act should be given by the Range Head. Para 3.2 The final show cause notice should be prepared in consultation with the Addl. CIT. 38.7 In view of the above the allegation of the appellant that the approval was a mechanical exercise without application of mind on his part is not correct as in Central Charges

S. P. SINGLA CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed whereas the stay applications are dismissed

ITA 144/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh17 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Dr Krinwant Sahay

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 139(5)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 80I

144A of the Act should be given by the Range Head. Para 3.2 The final show cause notice should be prepared in consultation with the Addl. CIT. 38.7 In view of the above the allegation of the appellant that the approval was a mechanical exercise without application of mind on his part is not correct as in Central Charges

S. P. SINGLA CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed whereas the stay applications are dismissed

ITA 140/CHANDI/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh17 Jan 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Dr Krinwant Sahay

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 139(5)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 80I

144A of the Act should be given by the Range Head. Para 3.2 The final show cause notice should be prepared in consultation with the Addl. CIT. 38.7 In view of the above the allegation of the appellant that the approval was a mechanical exercise without application of mind on his part is not correct as in Central Charges

S. P. SINGLA CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed whereas the stay applications are dismissed

ITA 142/CHANDI/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh17 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Dr Krinwant Sahay

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 139(5)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 80I

144A of the Act should be given by the Range Head. Para 3.2 The final show cause notice should be prepared in consultation with the Addl. CIT. 38.7 In view of the above the allegation of the appellant that the approval was a mechanical exercise without application of mind on his part is not correct as in Central Charges

SIMAR KAUR,KURUKSHETRA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE, KURUKSHETRA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 220/CHANDI/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh25 May 2021AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir SehgalFor Respondent: Shri Ashok Khanna, Addl. CIT
Section 147Section 148Section 282

Section 282 (1) of the Act read with Order V Rule 12 CPC and Order III Rule 6 CPC for service of notice and thus even on this basis the service of notice was not properly made. The above clearly shows that no action was taken by the AO to ensure the service of such notice and no such proof