BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 80P(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore21Cochin20Delhi15Jaipur11Visakhapatnam11Amritsar10Chandigarh9Mumbai9Chennai6Indore6Varanasi6Ahmedabad5Lucknow5Surat4Pune3Nagpur3Rajkot2Jodhpur2Panaji1Guwahati1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 80P12Deduction9Penalty7Addition to Income7Section 2716Section 1476Section 144B6Section 244House Property

THE PUNJAB STATE FEDERATION OF COOPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETIES LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. ACIT, CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the above appeals of the Assessee are dismissed

ITA 797/CHANDI/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh19 Jan 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Atul Goyal, C.A (Virtual Mode)For Respondent: Dr. Ranjit Kaur, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 57oSection 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) for concealment and furnishing inaccurate particulars. 5. Against the order of the AO the assessee went in appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) upheld the assessment made by the Assessing Officer on all disputed issues. After considering the grounds of appeal, written submissions and referring to earlier appellate orders

3
Section 57o2
Section 80P(2)(a)2
Section 2632

THE PUNJAB STATE FEDERATION OF COOPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETIES LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the above appeals of the Assessee are dismissed

ITA 1308/CHANDI/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh19 Jan 2026AY 2012-13

Bench: the appeal is finally heard.

For Appellant: Shri Atul Goyal, C.A (Virtual Mode)For Respondent: Dr. Ranjit Kaur, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 57oSection 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) for concealment and furnishing inaccurate particulars. 5. Against the order of the AO the assessee went in appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) upheld the assessment made by the Assessing Officer on all disputed issues. After considering the grounds of appeal, written submissions and referring to earlier appellate orders

SHRI BALBIR SINGH VERMA,SHIMLA vs. PR.CIT, SHIMLA

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 314/CHANDI/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh14 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Sharma, CIT DR (Virtual)
Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 24Section 263Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)

penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) for concealment. 4. After reviewing the necessary details, the Assessing Officer assessed the assessee’s total income at Rs. 2,98,98,600/-, Agricultural income remained Rs. 20,27,700/-. During hearing before us, it was stated by Ld. AR that the appellant had filed appeal before the CIT(A) against this assessment

THE SAHA PRIMARY AGRICULTURE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,AMBALA vs. ITO, WARD-4, AMBALA

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the Assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 54/CHANDI/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh29 Aug 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Jaspal Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 144BSection 147Section 271Section 80P

2. All these cases were heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order. 3. During the course of hearing, the Ld. AR submitted that the assessee has filed three appeals against quantum proceedings for assessment years 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17 and three appeals against penalty u/s 271(l)(c) for the same years against

THE SAHA PRIMARY AGRICULTURE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,AMBALA vs. ITO, WARD-4, AMBALA

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the Assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 55/CHANDI/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh29 Aug 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Jaspal Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 144BSection 147Section 271Section 80P

2. All these cases were heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order. 3. During the course of hearing, the Ld. AR submitted that the assessee has filed three appeals against quantum proceedings for assessment years 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17 and three appeals against penalty u/s 271(l)(c) for the same years against

THE SAHA PRIMARY AGRICULTURE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,AMBALA vs. ITO, WARD-4, AMBALA

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the Assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 56/CHANDI/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh29 Aug 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Jaspal Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 144BSection 147Section 271Section 80P

2. All these cases were heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order. 3. During the course of hearing, the Ld. AR submitted that the assessee has filed three appeals against quantum proceedings for assessment years 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17 and three appeals against penalty u/s 271(l)(c) for the same years against

THE SAHA PRIMARY AGRICULTURE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,AMBALA vs. ITO, WARD-4, AMBALA

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the Assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 57/CHANDI/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh29 Aug 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Jaspal Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 144BSection 147Section 271Section 80P

2. All these cases were heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order. 3. During the course of hearing, the Ld. AR submitted that the assessee has filed three appeals against quantum proceedings for assessment years 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17 and three appeals against penalty u/s 271(l)(c) for the same years against

THE SAHA PRIMARY AGRICULTURE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,AMBALA vs. ITO, WARD-4, AMBALA

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the Assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 58/CHANDI/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh29 Aug 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Jaspal Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 144BSection 147Section 271Section 80P

2. All these cases were heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order. 3. During the course of hearing, the Ld. AR submitted that the assessee has filed three appeals against quantum proceedings for assessment years 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17 and three appeals against penalty u/s 271(l)(c) for the same years against

THE SAHA PRIMARY AGRICULTURE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,AMBALA vs. ITO, WARD-4, AMBALA

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the Assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 53/CHANDI/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh29 Aug 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Jaspal Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 144BSection 147Section 271Section 80P

2. All these cases were heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order. 3. During the course of hearing, the Ld. AR submitted that the assessee has filed three appeals against quantum proceedings for assessment years 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17 and three appeals against penalty u/s 271(l)(c) for the same years against