Search: penalty u/s 271

40 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 63clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 26343 Section 143(3)29 Addition to Income21 Section 14814 Penalty13 Section 271(1)(c)12 Section 143(2)9 Section 251(2)8 Section 271F

BALWINDER SINGH,SANGRUR vs. ITO, WARD, SUNAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 252/CHANDI/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh26 Apr 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Dev Ahuja, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Amanpreet Kaur, Sr. DR

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 148Section 271F

63,85,000/- in his bank account during the year under consideration and income has been assessed at Rs. 34,37,500/- and therefore the onus to file the return of income lies with the assessee in order to declare true income and disclose the source of cash so deposited and therefore the action of the AO in levy

Showing 1–20 of 40 · Page 1 of 2

BALWINDER SINGH,SANGRUR vs. ITO, WARD, SUNAM

BALWINDER SINGH,SANGRUR vs. ITO, WARD, SUNAM

CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, C-1(1), CHANDIGARH

CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD,CHANDIGARH vs. PR.CIT-1, CHANDIGARH

CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, C-1(1), CHANDIGARH

DCIT, C-1(1), CHANDIGARH vs. CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD, CHANDIGARH

SH. DINESH SETHI,LUDHIANA vs. ITO, LUDHIANA

SHRI DINESH SETHI,LUDHIANA vs. ITO, LUDHIANA

OSHO FORGE LTD.,LUDHIANA vs. DCIT, LUDHIANA

M/S SATWANT AGRO ENGINEERS,BHAWANIGARH vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, PATIALA

SATISH GARG,YAMUNA NAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4, INCOME TAX OFFICE, YAMUNA NAGAR

M/S ASHA TECHNOLOGIES,SIRMOUR vs. ADDL. CIT, SOLAN

M/S ASHA TECHNOLOGIES,KALA AMB vs. ITO, SIRMOUR

PAWAN KUMAR SINGLA,PANCHKULA vs. DCIT, CC-I, CHANDIGARH

M/S LUXMI BUILDERS,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, CHANDIGARH

M/S GANESH BUILDERS,PANCHKULA vs. DCIT, CC-1, CHANDIGARH

BALWINDER SINGH BAJWA,SANGRUR vs. ITO, WARD, SUNAM

IPF VIKRAM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,CHANDIGARH vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE, PANCHKULA, PANCHKULA

THE SHAHABAD COOP. SUGAR MILLS,SHAHABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE, KURUKSHETRA

SH. GAURAV PATHAK,LUDHIANA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, LUDHIANA

BAHADUR SINGH ,ZIRAKPUR vs. ITO WARD 3(5), CHANDIGARH