Search: penalty u/s 271

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 56(2)(viib)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi32 Mumbai17 Pune7 Raipur4 Chandigarh3 Kolkata3 Hyderabad2 Nagpur2 Indore2 Visakhapatnam1 Amritsar1 Jaipur1 Surat1 Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 143(2)9 Section 2533 Section 2503 Section 127(2)3 Section 142(1)3

KANGRA VALLEY GARDEN HOTELS PRIVATE LIMITED,KANGRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD DHARAMSHALA, HIMACHAL PRADESH, DHARAMSHALA

Appeal of the assessee is allowed as and by

ITA 600/CHANDI/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh18 Dec 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: This Tribunal As & By Way Of Second Appeal.

For Appellant: Shri Mayank Aggarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Sharma, CIT DR (Virtual)

Section 127(2)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 250Section 253

u/s 68 were completely looked into. (ii) Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Nr Portfolio Pvt. Ltd. on 22 November, 2013 "Whether or not onus is discharged depends upon facts of each case. It depends on whether the two parties are related or known to each; the manner or mode by which the parties approached each other, whether the transaction