M/S MAHARAJA LIGHT & TENT SERVICES,LUDHIANA vs. DCIT, CC-1, LUDHIANA

In the result, all the above appeals of different assessees are partly allowed for statistical purposes

271(1)(c), Section 271AAA & Section 271AAB, the Legislature has restricted the scope of penal provision only to “undisclosed income” and not assessed total income. Moreover the term/expression “undisclosed income” has been defined by the Legislature in all such penal provisions in a specific and restricted manner and not in an inclusive manner. For that reason the definition of undisclosed

SMT. VANI JAIN,LUDHIANA vs. DCIT, CC-1, LUDHIANA

In the result, all the above appeals of different assessees are partly allowed for statistical purposes

271(1)(c), Section 271AAA & Section 271AAB, the Legislature has restricted the scope of penal provision only to “undisclosed income” and not assessed total income. Moreover the term/expression “undisclosed income” has been defined by the Legislature in all such penal provisions in a specific and restricted manner and not in an inclusive manner. For that reason the definition of undisclosed

SMT. SHWETA JAIN,LUDHIANA vs. DCIT, CC-1, LUDHIANA

In the result, all the above appeals of different assessees are partly allowed for statistical purposes

271(1)(c), Section 271AAA & Section 271AAB, the Legislature has restricted the scope of penal provision only to “undisclosed income” and not assessed total income. Moreover the term/expression “undisclosed income” has been defined by the Legislature in all such penal provisions in a specific and restricted manner and not in an inclusive manner. For that reason the definition of undisclosed

THE KANGRA CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,DHARAMSHALA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PALAMPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: SHRI. RAJPAL YADAV (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

3) dt. 05/03/2014 wherein the AO has, interalia, made a disallowance of provision made towards standard assets amounting to Rs. 2,21,28,000/- and separately, the penalty proceedings were initiated under section 271(1)(c) of the Act for concealment of income by furnishing inaccurate particulars of income by issuing a notice dt. 05/03/2014 under section 274 r.w.s 271

THE KANGRA CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,DHARAMSHALA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PALAMPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

3)\ndt. 05/03/2014 wherein the AO has, interalia, made a disallowance of provision\nmade towards standard assets amounting to Rs.2,21,28,000/- and separately,\nthe penalty proceedings were initiated under section 271(1)(c) of the Act for\nconcealment of income by furnishing inaccurate particulars of income by\nissuing a notice dt. 05/03/2014 under section 274 r.w.s 271

M/S HIMACHAL FASHION PVT. LTD.,LUDHIANA vs. ITO, W-6(3), LUDHIANA

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Krinwant Sahay & Shri Paresh M. Joshiआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 8/Chd/2020 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13

3. An opportunity was given to assessee company vide this office letter dated 16.03.2015 to show cause why the deduction u/s. 80-IC of Rs.75,17,116/- should not be disallowed and added to the income for the A.Y. 2012-13. In response to the counsel of the assessee vide his letter dated 17.03.2015 contended that the filing of return

M/S YAMUNA POWER & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.,JAGADHRI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE, YAMUNANAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

271 AA o f the Act the appellant was asked to provide any details/copies o f account of such transactions. No such notice/questionnaire/order sheet entry in this regard is available on record/file o f the appellant with the department. The Ld. Assessing Officer while levying the impugned penalty has time and again referred to the failure on part

M/S ANUBHUTI COLD CHAINS PVT. LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. ITO, W-4(4), CHANDIGARH

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Ms. Diva Singhm/S Anubhuti Cold Chains Vs. The Ito Pvt. Ltd.,Sco 363-364, Ward 4(4), 2Nd Floor, Sector 35-B, Chandigarh Chandigarh Pan No. Aagca7238R (Appellant) (Respondent)

penalty u/s 271(1)(c) under Income Tax Act, 1961 levied by Ld. Assessing officer on the addition of Rs. 12,58.918/- in violation of section 40A (3

M/S SILVER OAKS TOWNSHIP LTD.,BATHINDA vs. DCIT-CC-III, LUDHIANA

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 183/Chd/2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13 M/S Silver Oaks Township Vs. The Dcit, Central Circle-Iii, Ltd., बनाम Ludhiana 163, Urban Estate, Phase Ii, Bhatinda 151001 "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aajcs3445B अपीलाथ"/ Appellant ""यथ"/ Repsondent ( Physical Hearing ) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Sudhir Sehgal, Adv. राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue By : Dr. Ranjit Kaur, Addl. Cit, Sr. Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 02.01.2025 उदघोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 03 .02.2025

section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act. 2. That the Ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that all such particulars of the payments having been made u/s 40A(3) have already been disclosed and the disallowance has been made on account of deeming provisions and, therefore, no penalty u/s 271

DCIT, C-5, LUDHIANA vs. M/S HERO CYCLES LTD., LUDHIANA

In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed and the Cross

40A(2), therefore the decision of Apex Court may not be applied. If it is considered so, then the disallowance cannot be made on the ground being "excessive expenditure" claimed by the assessee company. Regarding allow-ability of the reasonable expenses based on commercial expediency for the purpose of business, the expenditure is fully allowable. As further confirmed

SUNRISE INFRATEC PRIVATE LIMITED,PANCHKULA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeal of the Assessee stand allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 1196/Chd/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13 Sunrise Infratec Private The Ito, बनाम Limited, Ward 3(5), H.No. 858, Sector 4, Chandigarh Vs. Panchkula 134112 "थायी लेखा सं./ Pan No: Aaqcs4002D अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent ( Hybrid Hearing ) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Sh. T.N. Singla, Ca (Virtual Mode) राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue By : Sh. Rajat Kumar Kureel, Cit Dr

40A(3) by AO on account of payment made in cash of Rs. 98,00,000/- for purchase of land. 12. That the Ld. JCIT (A) has wrongly upheld additions made by AO u/s 69A of the Act on account of advances received from customers of Rs. 10,43,29,000/-. 13. That the Ld. JCIT (A) has wrongly upheld

M/S ASHA TECHNOLOGIES,KALA AMB vs. ITO, SIRMOUR

In the result, both the above appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed as aforesaid in respect of impugned orders dt

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

u/s 133A of the IT Act to find out the true facts of the case when there was no compliance and cooperation on the part of the assessee to prove its primary onus. And on the basis of survey only true facts of the case were ascertained which helped in ascertaining the factual reality. The assessing office collected information u/s

M/S ASHA TECHNOLOGIES,SIRMOUR vs. ADDL. CIT, SOLAN

In the result, both the above appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed as aforesaid in respect of impugned orders dt

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

u/s 133A of the IT Act to find out the true facts of the case when there was no compliance and cooperation on the part of the assessee to prove its primary onus. And on the basis of survey only true facts of the case were ascertained which helped in ascertaining the factual reality. The assessing office collected information u/s

ITO, WARD-6(1), MOHALI vs. QUARKCITY INDIA PVT. LTD., MOHALI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

40A, Industrial Focal Point, Phase VIII Extn. Mohali-160059 "ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAACQ1134G अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent (VIRTUAL HEARING) िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Vineet Thakral Advocate And Shri Raman Aggarwal, C.A राज" की ओर से/ Revenue by : Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 12/02/2025 उदघोषणा की तारीख/Date

ITO, WARD-6(1), MOHALI vs. QUARKCITY INDIA PVT. LTD., MOHALI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

40A, Industrial Focal Point, Phase VIII Extn. Mohali-160059 "ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAACQ1134G अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent (VIRTUAL HEARING) िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Vineet Thakral Advocate And Shri Raman Aggarwal, C.A राज" की ओर से/ Revenue by : Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 12/02/2025 उदघोषणा की तारीख/Date

ITO, WARD-6(1), MOHALI vs. QUARKCITY INDIA PVT. LTD., MOHALI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

40A, Industrial Focal Point, Phase VIII Extn. Mohali-160059 "ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAACQ1134G अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent (VIRTUAL HEARING) िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Vineet Thakral Advocate And Shri Raman Aggarwal, C.A राज" की ओर से/ Revenue by : Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 12/02/2025 उदघोषणा की तारीख/Date

ITO, WARD-6(1), MOHALI vs. QUARKCITY INDIA PVT. LTD., MPHALI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

40A, Industrial Focal Point, Phase VIII Extn. Mohali-160059 "ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAACQ1134G अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent (VIRTUAL HEARING) िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Vineet Thakral Advocate And Shri Raman Aggarwal, C.A राज" की ओर से/ Revenue by : Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 12/02/2025 उदघोषणा की तारीख/Date

ITO, WARD-6(1), MOHALI vs. QUARKCITY INDIA PVT. LTD., MOHALI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

40A, Industrial Focal Point, Phase VIII Extn. Mohali-160059 "ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAACQ1134G अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent (VIRTUAL HEARING) िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Vineet Thakral Advocate And Shri Raman Aggarwal, C.A राज" की ओर से/ Revenue by : Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 12/02/2025 उदघोषणा की तारीख/Date

ITO, WARD-6(1), MOHALI vs. QUARKCITY INDIA PVT. LTD., MPHALI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

40A, Industrial Focal Point, Phase VIII Extn. Mohali-160059 "ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAACQ1134G अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent (VIRTUAL HEARING) िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Vineet Thakral Advocate And Shri Raman Aggarwal, C.A राज" की ओर से/ Revenue by : Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 12/02/2025 उदघोषणा की तारीख/Date