Search: penalty u/s 271

7 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 273clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi112 Mumbai63 Jaipur57 Bangalore32 Indore26 Visakhapatnam15 Hyderabad12 Ahmedabad12 Pune9 Kolkata9 Lucknow9 Cochin8 Chandigarh7 Rajkot6 Chennai5 Raipur4 Nagpur4 Agra3 Cuttack3 Patna1 Jodhpur1 Jabalpur1 Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)8 Section 2536 Section 143(2)6 Section 270A5 Penalty5 Section 2634 Addition to Income4 Section 2502 Section 80I

DCIT, C-1(1), CHANDIGARH vs. CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the Appeal of assessee is partly allowed

ITA 103/CHANDI/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh31 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ANDSHRI PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri A.K.Jindal, CA &For Respondent: Shri Rohit Sharma, CIT DR

Section 253Section 271(1)(c)

section 40(a)(ii)of the Income Tax Act, 1961.. 3. 20.11.2018 u/s 250(6) The CIT(A) has confirmed the addition.As the assessee has not filed any appeal with regard to CIT(A) order. Hence, the addition has attained finality. 4. 29.06.2017 u/s 271(l)(c) Penalty was imposed by the Assessing Officer amounting to Rs.8

CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, C-1(1), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the Appeal of assessee is partly allowed

DCIT, C-1(1), CHANDIGARH vs. CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD, CHANDIGARH

CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, C-1(1), CHANDIGARH

DCIT, C-1(1), CHANDIGARH vs. CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD, CHANDIGARH

CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, C-1(1), CHANDIGARH

CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, C-1(1), CHANDIGARH

CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD,CHANDIGARH vs. PR.CIT-1, CHANDIGARH

DINESH VERMA,MANALI, HIMACHAL PRADESH vs. ITO, ITO WARD KULLU

M/S ASHA TECHNOLOGIES,SIRMOUR vs. ADDL. CIT, SOLAN

M/S ASHA TECHNOLOGIES,KALA AMB vs. ITO, SIRMOUR