Search: penalty u/s 271

4 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 271Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi71 Indore52 Jaipur47 Hyderabad42 Chennai27 Mumbai27 Pune23 Bangalore22 Visakhapatnam15 Cochin10 Kolkata9 Ahmedabad7 Rajkot7 Nagpur6 Chandigarh4 Amritsar2 Raipur2 Cuttack2 Jodhpur1 Surat1 Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 14818 Section 153A4 Section 143(2)4 Addition to Income4 Section 271A2 Section 143(3)2 Section 1322 Section 133(6)2 Section 271D2

SUBHASH CHANDER GUPTA, H.NO. 1652 8 VISHNU COLONY, RAILWAY ROAD, KURUKSHETRA,HARYANA vs. ITO WARD-3, KURUKSHETRA, HARYANA

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are

ITA 765/CHANDI/2024[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh07 Apr 2025AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahay

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, Advocate and Shri Abhinav Gupta, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT, DR

Section 143(2)Section 148Section 153C

u/s 147-148. 8. After examining the case as above together with the information available on record and the replies filed on behalf of the assessee, I hold the afore said amount of Rs. 13.00 crores as to be the assessee's undisclosed income, which, in addition to normal tax liability thereon, also renders the assessee liable for penalty under

SUBHASH CHANDER GUPTA, H.NO. 1652 8 VISHNU COLONY, RAILWAY ROAD, KURUKSHETRA,HARYANA vs. ITO WARD-3, KURUKSHETRA, HARYANA

SUBHASH CHANDER GUPTA, H.NO. 16528 VISHNU COLONY, RALIWAY ROAD, KURUKSHETRA,HARYANA vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KURUKSHETRA

SUBHASH CHANDER GUPTA, H.NO. 1652 8 VISHNU COLONY, RAILWAY ROAD, KURUKSHETRA,HARYANA vs. ITO WARD-3, KURUKSHETRA, HARYANA

SUBHASH CHANDER GUPTA, H.NO. 16528 VISHNU COLONY, RALIWAY ROAD, KURUKSHETRA,HARYANA vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KURUKSHETRA

TARA HEALTH FOODS LTD.,MALERKOTLA vs. DCIT, LUDHIANA

TARA HEALTH FOODS LIMITED,MALERKOTLA vs. DCIT, LUDHIANA