Search: penalty u/s 271

88 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 27clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 14865 Section 153A46 Section 26345 Addition to Income43 Section 143(3)35 Section 143(2)33 Section 142(1)27 Section 25025 Section 147

M/S APEEJAY EDUCATION SOCIETY,JALANDHAR vs. DCIT, C-1 (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 706/CHANDI/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh01 May 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: SHRI A.D.JAIN (Vice President), SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Amanpreet Kaur, Sr.DR

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 271(1)(b)

Section 271(1)(b); that the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (A)fell into grave error by confirming the penalty of Rs. 10,000/-. 6. The ld. DR, on the other hand, has placed strong reliance on the impugned order. 7. The penalty in question was imposed u/s 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act vide order dated

INDER PAL SINGH LEGAL HEIR OF DECEASED SATNAM SINGH 171789, STREET NO.8, GURU TEG BAHADUR JAGRAON,PUNJAB vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1 JAGRAON , PUNJAB

Showing 1–20 of 88 · Page 1 of 5

M/S APEEJAY EDUCATION SOCIETY,JALANDHAR vs. DCIT, C-1 (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

INDER PAL SINGH LEGAL HEIR OF DECEASED SATNAM SINGH 171789, STREET NO.8, GURU TEG BAHADUR JAGRAON,PUNJAB vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1 JAGRAON , PUNJAB

M/S APEEJAY EDUCATION SOCIETY,JALANDHAR vs. DCIT, C-1 (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

INDER PAL SINGH LEGAL HEIR OF DECEASED SATNAM SINGH 171789, STREET NO.8, GURU TEG BAHADUR JAGRAON,PUNJAB vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1 JAGRAON , PUNJAB

CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, C-1(1), CHANDIGARH

DCIT, C-1(1), CHANDIGARH vs. CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD, CHANDIGARH

CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, C-1(1), CHANDIGARH

CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD,CHANDIGARH vs. PR.CIT-1, CHANDIGARH

RAM KUMAR,NEHRU GARDEN COLONY vs. ITO WARD 2 KAITHAL, AAYKAR BHAWAN, AMBALA ROAD KAITHAL

RAM KUMAR,NEHRU GARDEN COLONY vs. ITO WARD 2, KAITHAL

SH. DINESH SETHI,LUDHIANA vs. ITO, LUDHIANA

SHRI DINESH SETHI,LUDHIANA vs. ITO, LUDHIANA

M/S YAMUNA POWER & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.,JAGADHRI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE, YAMUNANAGAR

M/S SATWANT AGRO ENGINEERS,BHAWANIGARH vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, PATIALA

JAGROOP SINGH,BARNALA vs. ITO, W-1, BARNALA

GURMEET SINGH,PUNJAB vs. ITO, WARD-2(2), ROPAR, PUNJAB

SHRI BALBIR SINGH VERMA,SHIMLA vs. PR.CIT, SHIMLA

GURCHARAN SINGH,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 6(1) LUDHIANA, LUDHIANA

GURCHARAN SINGH ,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 6(1), LUDHIANA , LUDHIANA

GURCHARAN SINGH,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 6(1) LUDHIANA, LUDHIANA

GURCHARAN SINGH,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 6(1), LUDHIANA, LUDHIANA

GURCHARAN SINGH,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 6(1) LUDHIANA, LUDHIANA