Search: penalty u/s 271

11 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 264clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 26345 Section 143(3)17 Section 153A4 Section 2514 Section 80I3 Addition to Income3 Section 153C2 Section 1322 Section 153D

M/S PAGRO FROZEN FOODS PVT. LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. ITO, W-2(3), CHANDIGARH

The appeal of the Assessee is dismissed

ITA 1076/CHANDI/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh31 Jul 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vineet Krishan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Dharam Vir, JCIT, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 253

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act is being initiated separately for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. 25. The Assessee feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the AO’s order dt. 26/12/2016 had filed first appeal before Ld. CIT(A) who vide impugned order has dismissed the same. The core finding of CIT(A) is as follows

M/S PAGRO FROZEN FOODS PVT. LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. ITO, W-2(3), CHANDIGARH

M/S GANESH BUILDERS,PANCHKULA vs. DCIT, CC-1, CHANDIGARH

M/S PAGRO FROZEN FOODS PVT. LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. ITO, W-2(3), CHANDIGARH

M/S GANESH BUILDERS,PANCHKULA vs. DCIT, CC-1, CHANDIGARH

M/S LUXMI BUILDERS,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, CHANDIGARH

SH. R.P. KAPUR,MANDI vs. PR. CIT, SHIMLA

SURJEET SINGH,SIRSA vs. PCIT, ROHTAK, ROHTAK

SH. KASHMIR SINGH SANDHA,SIRSA vs. PCIT, ROHTAK

M/S GANESH DASS HUF,SIRSA vs. PCIT, ROHTAK

DHUNI CHAND HUF,SIRSA vs. PCIT, ROHTAK

SH. RANDHIR SINGH,SIRSA vs. PCIT ROHTAK, ROHTAK

SH. PARAMJEET SINGH,SIRSA vs. PCIT, ROHTAK

SH. ARVAIL SINGH,SIRSA vs. PCIT, ROHTAK