Search: penalty u/s 271

7 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 246clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)16 Section 80I14 Penalty7 Section 14A6 Section 142(1)5 Section 1445 Addition to Income5 Section 2714 Section 250(6)

HYCRON ELECTRONICS vs. DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

Appeal of the Revenue is dismissed and appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1217/CHANDI/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh06 Mar 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Dr. Gulshan Raj

Section 14ASection 250(6)Section 271Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 80Section 80I

246 ITR 571 (Delhi).] (v) The Hon'ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh in the matter of Narendra Kumar Rajendra Kumar Jain vs. Commissioner of Income Tax reported in (1988) 174 fTR 479 (MP) while deciding on the issue of levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act held that the penalty has been levied u/s 271

HYCRON ELECTRONICS vs. DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

HYCRON ELECTRONICS vs. DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

DCIT, PARWANOO vs. M/S HYCRON ELECTRONICS, SOLAN

SH. ANIL TALWAR,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, CC-II, CHANDIGARH

INDER PAL SINGH LEGAL HEIR OF DECEASED SATNAM SINGH 171789, STREET NO.8, GURU TEG BAHADUR JAGRAON,PUNJAB vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1 JAGRAON , PUNJAB

JAGROOP SINGH,BARNALA vs. ITO, W-1, BARNALA

M/S CHANDIGARH BOTTLING CO.,CHANDIGARH vs. ACIT, CHANDIGARH

PRABHA GOYAL,CHANDIGARH vs. ITO, W-5(1), CHANDIGARH