NARMAIL SINGH ,YAMUNA NAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5, YAMUNA NAGAR
In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 699/CHANDI/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh04 Jul 2024AY 2014-15
Bench: Dr Krinwant Sahay & Shri Paresh M. Joshiआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 699/Chd/2023 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2014-15 Narmail Singh, Vs. The Ito, बनाम Ward-5, Yamunanagar Yamunanagar "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Dyhps5817P अपीलाथ"/ Appellant ""यथ"/ Repsondent
For Appellant: Shri Tejmohan Singh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Dharam Vir, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 148Section 194ASection 271Section 56(2)Section 57
penalty of Rs.. 3,21,900/- imposed under section 271 (l)(c) of the Act which is arbitrary and unjustified.
4. That the appellant craves leave to add or amend the grounds of appeal before the appeal is finally heard or disposed off.
5. That the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income
Tax(Appeals) Officer is arbitrary, opposed
