Search: penalty u/s 271

8 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Deemed Dividendclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai133 Delhi109 Raipur37 Ahmedabad22 Chennai22 Pune19 Jaipur12 Bangalore12 Kolkata12 Hyderabad9 Indore8 Panaji8 Chandigarh8 Guwahati5 Amritsar2 Lucknow2 Nagpur1 Surat1 Cuttack1 Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 26342 Section 143(3)14 Section 14A3

THE SHAHABAD COOP. SUGAR MILLS,SHAHABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE, KURUKSHETRA

ITA 1492/CHANDI/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh28 May 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Us In Terms Of Section 253 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. The Assessee Being Aggrieved By The Order Of Ld. Cit(A) Dt. 11/03/2018 Which Is Hereinafter Referred To As The Impugned Order, Before This Tribunal In Form No. 36 Has Interalia Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

For Appellant: Shri Varun Gupta, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Dharam Vir, JCIT, Sr. DR

Section 14Section 14ASection 253

u/s 271(l)(c) of the I.T. Act are attracted in this case for which penalty proceedings are initiated separately." The submissions made by the appellant have been clearly controverted by the A.O. in arriving at his conclusion. In the circumstances, I consider that the addition has been correctly made and confirm the same. This ground of appeal is dismissed

THE SHAHABAD COOP. SUGAR MILLS,SHAHABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE, KURUKSHETRA

M/S GANESH DASS HUF,SIRSA vs. PCIT, ROHTAK

THE SHAHABAD COOP. SUGAR MILLS,SHAHABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE, KURUKSHETRA

M/S GANESH DASS HUF,SIRSA vs. PCIT, ROHTAK

SH. KASHMIR SINGH SANDHA,SIRSA vs. PCIT, ROHTAK

DHUNI CHAND HUF,SIRSA vs. PCIT, ROHTAK

SH. RANDHIR SINGH,SIRSA vs. PCIT ROHTAK, ROHTAK

SH. PARAMJEET SINGH,SIRSA vs. PCIT, ROHTAK

SH. ARVAIL SINGH,SIRSA vs. PCIT, ROHTAK

SURJEET SINGH,SIRSA vs. PCIT, ROHTAK, ROHTAK