AJAY KUMAR,FATEHABAD, HARYANA vs. ITO, WARD-1, FATEHABAD, FATEHABAD, HARYANA

4(1)\nChandigarh\nस्थायी लेखा सं./ PAN NO: AJSPG9695G\nअपीलार्थी/Appellant\nनिर्धारिती की ओर से/Assessee by :\nNone\nराजस्व की ओर से / Revenue by :\nShri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR\nआयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 180 /Chd/ 2023\nनिर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year: 2018-19\nShri Pargat Singh\nVPO-Ravan Hera, The: Dhand,\nDist: Kaithal, Haryana-132103\nबनाम\nThe ITO\nWard

SAROJ CHAUDHARY BALA,PANCHKULA vs. ITO, WARD-4, PANCHKULA

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 16 or Section 17 of the Act. We, therefore, hold that the statutory interest paid under Section 34 of the Act is interest paid for the delayed payment of the compensation amount and, therefore, is a revenue receipt liable to tax under the Income Tax Act." 9. This position of law has been consistently reiterated by this Court

SH. AMARDEEP SINGH ATHWAL,YAMUNANAGAR vs. ITO, WARD-1, YAMUNANAGAR

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 16 or Section 17 of the Act. We, therefore, hold that the statutory interest paid under Section 34 of the Act is interest paid for the delayed payment of the compensation amount and, therefore, is a revenue receipt liable to tax under the Income Tax Act." 9. This position of law has been consistently reiterated by this Court

RANJIT SINGH,PANCHKULA vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR, CPC DEPARTMENT

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 16 or Section 17 of the Act. We, therefore, hold that the statutory interest paid under Section 34 of the Act is interest paid for the delayed payment of the compensation amount and, therefore, is a revenue receipt liable to tax under the Income Tax Act." 9. This position of law has been consistently reiterated by this Court

SMT. SHANKRI DEVI,PANCHKULA vs. ACIT, PANCKULA CIRCLE, PANCHKULA

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 16 or Section 17 of the Act. We, therefore, hold that the statutory interest paid under Section 34 of the Act is interest paid for the delayed payment of the compensation amount and, therefore, is a revenue receipt liable to tax under the Income Tax Act." 9. This position of law has been consistently reiterated by this Court

SH. AMARDEEP SINGH ATHWAL,YAMUNANAGAR vs. ITO, WARD-1, YAMUNANAGAR

Bench: BEFORE: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 16 or Section 17 of the Act. We, therefore, hold that the statutory interest paid under Section 34 of the Act is interest paid for the delayed payment of the compensation amount and, therefore, is a revenue receipt liable to tax under the Income Tax Act." 9. This position of law has been consistently reiterated by this Court

PAWAN KUMAR,FATEHABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, FATEHABAD

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 16 or Section 17 of the Act. We, therefore, hold that the statutory interest paid under Section 34 of the Act is interest paid for the delayed payment of the compensation amount and, therefore, is a revenue receipt liable to tax under the Income Tax Act." 9. This position of law has been consistently reiterated by this Court

INCOME TAX OFFICER, FATEHABAD vs. MAHESH NAGPAL, FATEHABAD

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 16 or Section 17 of the Act. We, therefore, hold that the statutory interest paid under Section 34 of the Act is interest paid for the delayed payment of the compensation amount and, therefore, is a revenue receipt liable to tax under the Income Tax Act." 9. This position of law has been consistently reiterated by this Court

BALBIR KUMAR HUF,CHANDIGARH vs. ITO , CHANDIGARH

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 16 or Section 17 of the Act. We, therefore, hold that the statutory interest paid under Section 34 of the Act is interest paid for the delayed payment of the compensation amount and, therefore, is a revenue receipt liable to tax under the Income Tax Act." 9. This position of law has been consistently reiterated by this Court

ARJESH KUMAR,PATIALA vs. ITO NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE , DELHI

Section 16 or Section 17 of the Act. We, therefore, hold that the statutory interest paid under Section 34 of the Act is interest paid for the delayed payment of the compensation amount and, therefore, is a revenue receipt liable to tax under the Income Tax Act." 9. This position of law has been consistently reiterated by this Court

KAKA SINGH ALIAS GULJAR SINGH,PATIALA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , PATIALA

section 57.\nThe said provision reads thus:\n\"57. Deductions.-The income chargeable under the head 'Income from other\nsources' shall be computed after making the following deductions, namely :.\n(iv) in the case of income of the nature referred to in clause (viii) of sub-\nsection (2) of section 56, a deduction of a sum equal to fifty

NARENDER KAUR,KURUKSHETRA, HARYANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1 , KURUKSHETRA

4(1)\nChandigarh\nH.No. 1360, Sector 33, Chandigarh-\n160034\nस्थायी लेखा सं./ PAN NO: AJSPG9695G\nअपीलार्थी/Appellant\nनिर्धारिती की ओर से/Assessee by :\nNone\nराजस्व की ओर से / Revenue by :\nShri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR\nआयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 180 /Chd/ 2023\nनिर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year: 2018-19\nShri Pargat Singh\nVPO-Ravan Hera, The: Dhand,\nDist: Kaithal, Haryana

BALVINDER SINGH,FATEHABAD vs. ITO WARD-1, FATEHABAD

4(1)\nChandigarh\nस्थायी लेखा सं./ PAN NO: AJSPG9695G\nअपीलार्थी/Appellant\nनिर्धारिती की ओर से/Assessee by :\nNone\nप्रत्यर्थी/Respondent\nराजस्व की ओर से / Revenue by :\nShri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR\nनिर्धारिती की ओर से/Assessee by :\nNone\nराजस्व की ओर से / Revenue by :\nShri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR\nआयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 317/Chd/2023\nनिर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year

BISHAN CHAND,CHANDIGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 5 (5), CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

4(1)\nChandigarh\nH.No. 1360, Sector 33, Chandigarh-\n160034\nस्थायी लेखा सं./ PAN NO: AJSPG9695G\nअपीलार्थी/Appellant\nनिर्धारिती की ओर से/Assessee by :\nNone\nप्रत्यर्थी/Respondent\nराजस्व की ओर से / Revenue by :\nShri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR\nShri Pargat Singh\nVPO-Ravan Hera, The: Dhand,\nDist: Kaithal, Haryana-132103\nआयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 180 /Chd/ 2023\nनिर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment

RAJBIR SINGH,VILL. GARHI BANJARA vs. ITO, WARD-3, YAMUNANAGAR

4(1)\nChandigarh\nस्थायी लेखा सं./ PAN NO: AJSPG9695G\nअपीलार्थी/Appellant\nनिर्धारिती की ओर से/Assessee by :\nNone\nराजस्व की ओर से / Revenue by :\nप्रत्यर्थी/Respondent\nShri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR\nआयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 317/Chd/2023\nनिर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2018-19\nShri Ram Lal\nH.No. 238, Nayagaon, Kaimbwala\nChandigarh-160103\nबनाम\nThe ITO\nWard-6(1)\nChandigarh\nस्थायी

INCOME TAX OFFICER, AMBALA vs. NACHHATAR SINGH, AMBALA CANTT

4(1)\nChandigarh\nस्थायी लेखा सं./ PAN NO: AJSPG9695G\nअपीलार्थी/Appellant\nनिर्धारिती की ओर से/Assessee by :\nNone\nराजस्व की ओर से / Revenue by : Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR\nआयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 317/Chd/2023\nनिर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2018-19\nShri Ram Lal\nH.No. 238, Nayagaon, Kaimbwala\nChandigarh-160103\nबनाम\nThe ITO\nWard-6(1)\nChandigarh\nस्थायी लेखा सं

SUSHMA,HARYANA vs. ITO, WARD - 4, YAMUNA NAGAR, YAMUNA NAGAR

4(1)\nChandigarh\nस्थायी लेखा सं./ PAN NO: AJSPG9695G\nअपीलार्थी/Appellant\nनिर्धारिती की ओर से/Assessee by :\nNone\nराजस्व की ओर से / Revenue by :\nShri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR\nआयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 317/Chd/2023\nनिर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2018-19\nShri Ram Lal\nबनाम\nThe ITO\nH.No. 238, Nayagaon, Kaimbwala\nChandigarh-160103\nWard-6(1)\nChandigarh\nस्थायी लेखा सं

SH. AMRIK SINGH,PANCHKULA vs. ITO, WARD-2, PANCHKULA

4(1)\nChandigarh\nस्थायी लेखा सं./ PAN NO: AJSPG9695G\nअपीलार्थी/Appellant\nनिर्धारिती की ओर से/Assessee by :\nNone\nप्रत्यर्थी/Respondent\nराजस्व की ओर से / Revenue by :\nShri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR\nनिर्धारिती की ओर से / Assessee by :\nNone\nराजस्व की ओर से / Revenue by :\nShri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR\nआयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 317/Chd/2023\nनिर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year

SAT PAL,CHANDIGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 5(5), , CHANDIGARH

4(1)\nChandigarh\nस्थायी लेखा सं./ PAN NO: AJSPG9695G\nअपीलार्थी/Appellant\nनिर्धारिती की ओर से/Assessee by :\nNone\nराजस्व की ओर से / Revenue by :\nShri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR\nनिर्धारिती की ओर से / Assessee by :\nNone\nराजस्व की ओर से / Revenue by :\nShri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR\nआयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 317/Chd/2023\nनिर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2018-19\nShri

M/S YOGRAJ CHAUDHARY,YAMUNA NAGAR vs. ITO, WARD-5, YAMUNA NAGAR

4(1)\nChandigarh\nस्थायी लेखा सं./ PAN NO: AJSPG9695G\nअपीलार्थी/Appellant\nNone\nराजस्व की ओर से / Revenue by :\nShri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR\nआयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 317/Chd/2023\nनिर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2018-19\nShri Ram Lal\nH.No. 238, Nayagaon, Kaimbwala\nChandigarh-160103\nबनाम\nThe ITO\nWard-6(1)\nChandigarh\nस्थायी लेखा सं. / PAN NO: AIRPL2814L\nअपीलार्थी/Appellant\nNone