AJAY KUMAR,FATEHABAD, HARYANA vs. ITO, WARD-1, FATEHABAD, FATEHABAD, HARYANA

4(1)\nChandigarh\nस्थायी लेखा सं./ PAN NO: AJSPG9695G\nअपीलार्थी/Appellant\nनिर्धारिती की ओर से/Assessee by :\nNone\nराजस्व की ओर से / Revenue by :\nShri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR\nआयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 180 /Chd/ 2023\nनिर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year: 2018-19\nShri Pargat Singh\nVPO-Ravan Hera, The: Dhand,\nDist: Kaithal, Haryana-132103\nबनाम\nThe ITO\nWard

DEVI DAYAL,KAITHAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 , KAITHAL

In the result, appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 899/Chd/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2008-09 Shri Devi Dayal, Vs The Ito, Pundri Anaj Mandi, Ward – 1, Kaithal-Haryana 136026. Kaithal. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aajpd5851H अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessee By : Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, Ca & Ms. Shruti Khandelwal, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Manav Bansal, Cit, Dr Date Of Hearing : 30.07.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 08.09.2025

property would constitute transfer. Thus, according to him, the case of the assessee falls within sub- clause (iv) and (vi) of Section 2(47) of the Income Tax Act. 11. We have duly considered the rival contentions and gone through the record carefully. There is no dispute qua the fact that agricultural land measuring 24 kanal 9 marla situated

SHRI BALRAM KRISHAN,CHANDIGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

houses of the managing director and\nother directors. In such a case, when the managing director or any other persons were\nfound to be not in possession of any incriminating material, the question of examining\nthem by the authorised officer during the course of search and recording any statement\nfrom them by invoking the powers under section 132(4

M/S FATEH HOMES PRIVATE LIMITED,CHANDIGARH vs. ITO WARD-1(4), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

4)- Where the property referred to in sub-section (2} consists of more than one house— (a) the provisions of that

SHRI BALRAM KRISHAN,CHANDIGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

houses of the managing director and\nother directors. In such a case, when the managing director or any other persons were\nfound to be not in possession of any incriminating material, the question of examining\nthem by the authorised officer during the course of search and recording any statement\nfrom them by invoking the powers under section 132(4

SCOTT EDIL ADVANCE RESEARCH LABORATORIES AND EDUCATION LIMITED,CHANDIGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH

houses of the managing director and\nother directors. In such a case, when the managing director or any other persons were\nfound to be not in possession of any incriminating material, the question of examining\nthem by the authorised officer during the course of search and recording any statement\nfrom them by invoking the powers under section 132(4

SCOTT EDIL PHARMACIA LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH

houses of the managing director and\nother directors. In such a case, when the managing director or any other persons were\nfound to be not in possession of any incriminating material, the question of examining\nthem by the authorised officer during the course of search and recording any statement\nfrom them by invoking the powers under section 132(4

DCIT, CC 1, CHANDIGARH , CHANDIGARH vs. SANJEEV AGGARWAL , CHANDIGARH

The appeals of the revenue are treated as dismissed

houses of the managing director and\nother directors. In such a case, when the managing director or any other persons were\nfound to be not in possession of any incriminating material, the question of examining\nthem by the authorised officer during the course of search and recording any statement\nfrom them by invoking the powers under section 132(4

SHRI BALRAM KRISHAN,CHANDIGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

houses of the managing director and\nother directors. In such a case, when the managing director or any other persons were\nfound to be not in possession of any incriminating material, the question of examining\nthem by the authorised officer during the course of search and recording any statement\nfrom them by invoking the powers under section 132(4

SCOTT EDIL PHARMACIA LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH

houses of the managing director and\nother directors. In such a case, when the managing director or any other persons were\nfound to be not in possession of any incriminating material, the question of examining\nthem by the authorised officer during the course of search and recording any statement\nfrom them by invoking the powers under section 132(4

DCIT, CHANDIGARH vs. SANJEEV AGGARWAL , CHANDIGARH

houses of the managing director and\nother directors. In such a case, when the managing director or any other persons were\nfound to be not in possession of any incriminating material, the question of examining\nthem by the authorised officer during the course of search and recording any statement\nfrom them by invoking the powers under section 132(4

MAXPORT INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,CHANDIGARH vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

houses of the managing director and\nother directors. In such a case, when the managing director or any other persons were\nfound to be not in possession of any incriminating material, the question of examining\nthem by the authorised officer during the course of search and recording any statement\nfrom them by invoking the powers under section 132(4

SANJEEV AGGARWAL,CHANDIGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1 , CHANDIGARH

houses of the managing director and\nother directors. In such a case, when the managing director or any other persons were\nfound to be not in possession of any incriminating material, the question of examining\nthem by the authorised officer during the course of search and recording any statement\nfrom them by invoking the powers under section 132(4

MAXPORT INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,CHANDIGARH vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

houses of the managing director and\nother directors. In such a case, when the managing director or any other persons were\nfound to be not in possession of any incriminating material, the question of examining\nthem by the authorised officer during the course of search and recording any statement\nfrom them by invoking the powers under section 132(4

SHRI BALRAM KRISHAN,CHANDIGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

houses of the managing director and\nother directors. In such a case, when the managing director or any other persons were\nfound to be not in possession of any incriminating material, the question of examining\nthem by the authorised officer during the course of search and recording any statement\nfrom them by invoking the powers under section 132(4

SCOTT EDIL PHARMACIA LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH

houses of the managing director and\nother directors. In such a case, when the managing director or any other persons were\nfound to be not in possession of any incriminating material, the question of examining\nthem by the authorised officer during the course of search and recording any statement\nfrom them by invoking the powers under section 132(4

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-I, CHANDIGARH , CHANDIGARH vs. MS SCOTT EDIL ADVANCE RESEARCH LABORATOTRIES AND EDUCATION LTD., , CHANDIGARH

houses of the managing director and\nother directors. In such a case, when the managing director or any other persons were\nfound to be not in possession of any incriminating material, the question of examining\nthem by the authorised officer during the course of search and recording any statement\nfrom them by invoking the powers under section 132(4

SHRI BALRAM KRISHAN,CHANDIGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

houses of the managing director and\nother directors. In such a case, when the managing director or any other persons were\nfound to be not in possession of any incriminating material, the question of examining\nthem by the authorised officer during the course of search and recording any statement\nfrom them by invoking the powers under section 132(4

SCOTT EDIL ADVANCE RESEARCH LABORATORIES AND EDUCATION LIMITED,CHANDIGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH

houses of the managing director and\nother directors. In such a case, when the managing director or any other persons were\nfound to be not in possession of any incriminating material, the question of examining\nthem by the authorised officer during the course of search and recording any statement\nfrom them by invoking the powers under section 132(4