BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “house property”+ Section 378(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka398Delhi282Mumbai219Bangalore94Chennai46Jaipur45Kolkata40Calcutta36Raipur26Ahmedabad21Pune19Hyderabad17Lucknow11Indore10Telangana10Chandigarh8Surat7Agra5Cuttack5Patna5Rajasthan5Cochin4Nagpur4Visakhapatnam4Rajkot3SC3Orissa1J&K1Punjab & Haryana1Guwahati1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 143(2)9Section 139(1)9Section 153A9Section 194A9Section 194C9Section 201(1)9Deduction8Section 246Section 1326

SH.DINESH DUA,DELHI vs. DCIT, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as partly

ITA 379/CHANDI/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh07 Sept 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Guptaassessment Year : 2008-09

For Appellant: Sh. S.K. Bhasin, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Manoj Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 24

property since he had invested the amount of capital gain in the purchase of another residential house ITA Nos. 1474 to1476/Chd/2017 & 378, 379 & 395/Chd/2016- Dinesh Dua, Delhi 8 within the stipulated time period as per the requirements of the Act. The Ld. Assessing officer, however, disallowed exemption u/s 54 of the Act from the said capital gain on the ground

Disallowance3
Addition to Income3
TDS3

SH. DINESH DUA,DELHI vs. DCIT, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as partly

ITA 395/CHANDI/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh07 Sept 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Guptaassessment Year : 2008-09

For Appellant: Sh. S.K. Bhasin, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Manoj Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 24

property since he had invested the amount of capital gain in the purchase of another residential house ITA Nos. 1474 to1476/Chd/2017 & 378, 379 & 395/Chd/2016- Dinesh Dua, Delhi 8 within the stipulated time period as per the requirements of the Act. The Ld. Assessing officer, however, disallowed exemption u/s 54 of the Act from the said capital gain on the ground

SHRI DINESH DUA,DELHI vs. DCIT, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as partly

ITA 378/CHANDI/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh07 Sept 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Guptaassessment Year : 2008-09

For Appellant: Sh. S.K. Bhasin, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Manoj Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 24

property since he had invested the amount of capital gain in the purchase of another residential house ITA Nos. 1474 to1476/Chd/2017 & 378, 379 & 395/Chd/2016- Dinesh Dua, Delhi 8 within the stipulated time period as per the requirements of the Act. The Ld. Assessing officer, however, disallowed exemption u/s 54 of the Act from the said capital gain on the ground

M/S ASHA TECHNOLOGIES,SIRMOUR vs. ADDL. CIT, SOLAN

In the result, both the above appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed as aforesaid in respect of impugned orders dt

ITA 388/CHANDI/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh19 Jul 2024AY 2007-08

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Mohan, Sr. Advocate with Shri Aditya Sood, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sarabjeet Singh, CIT, DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 250Section 253Section 80I

House Clamp, Cable, Cable Lug, Jointing Sleeve, Tie Strap, Insulating Cover, Plastic Feeder Clamps, Adaptor, Threaded Rod, Screw, Nuts, Washer, Marking Label, Ladder, Ladder Joint, Ladder Hook, Pendulum, Wall Bracket, Flexible Conductor, lug, Bolt, Junction, Angle Support, Rivet, Tube Holder, Cable Chute, Modular Box etc. etc. The purchase bills of these materials by the assessee firm also clearly mention

M/S ASHA TECHNOLOGIES,KALA AMB vs. ITO, SIRMOUR

In the result, both the above appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed as aforesaid in respect of impugned orders dt

ITA 61/CHANDI/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh19 Jul 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Mohan, Sr. Advocate with Shri Aditya Sood, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sarabjeet Singh, CIT, DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 250Section 253Section 80I

House Clamp, Cable, Cable Lug, Jointing Sleeve, Tie Strap, Insulating Cover, Plastic Feeder Clamps, Adaptor, Threaded Rod, Screw, Nuts, Washer, Marking Label, Ladder, Ladder Joint, Ladder Hook, Pendulum, Wall Bracket, Flexible Conductor, lug, Bolt, Junction, Angle Support, Rivet, Tube Holder, Cable Chute, Modular Box etc. etc. The purchase bills of these materials by the assessee firm also clearly mention

ACIT, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S SUKHAM INFRASTRUCTURE P. LTD., CHANDIGARH

Appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 249/CHANDI/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh07 Jun 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year : 2012-13

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Abrol, CIT DRFor Respondent: Sh. Amitoz Singh Kamboj, CA
Section 194ASection 194CSection 201(1)

property both movable and immovable, and, to contract and by the said name sue and be sued. (5) The provisions of this Act shall mutatis mutandis apply to Special Urban Planning and Development Authority constituted under sub-section (1) as they apply in relation to the Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority with the modification that references to the Punjab

ITO (TDS-1), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S SUKHM INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD., CHANDIGARH

Appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 638/CHANDI/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh07 Jun 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year : 2012-13

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Abrol, CIT DRFor Respondent: Sh. Amitoz Singh Kamboj, CA
Section 194ASection 194CSection 201(1)

property both movable and immovable, and, to contract and by the said name sue and be sued. (5) The provisions of this Act shall mutatis mutandis apply to Special Urban Planning and Development Authority constituted under sub-section (1) as they apply in relation to the Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority with the modification that references to the Punjab

ACIT, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S SUKHAM INFRASTRUCTURE P. LTD., CHANDIGARH

Appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 250/CHANDI/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh07 Jun 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year : 2012-13

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Abrol, CIT DRFor Respondent: Sh. Amitoz Singh Kamboj, CA
Section 194ASection 194CSection 201(1)

property both movable and immovable, and, to contract and by the said name sue and be sued. (5) The provisions of this Act shall mutatis mutandis apply to Special Urban Planning and Development Authority constituted under sub-section (1) as they apply in relation to the Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority with the modification that references to the Punjab