BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ TP Methodclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai403Delhi256Chennai107Bangalore86Hyderabad62Kolkata57Ahmedabad36Pune16Jaipur13Indore10Amritsar9Visakhapatnam9Surat5Rajkot4Cochin4Dehradun2Chandigarh2Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 37(1)2Addition to Income2

M/S CENTRIENT PHARMACEUTICALS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,NAWANSHAHAR vs. ADDITINAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSTT. C.IT,ITO,NEAC, DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 102/CHANDI/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh18 Jun 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Darpan Kirpalani, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Sharma, CIT DR
Section 144

method and determined ALP of the transaction as Nil. The TPO has further observed that no independent party would have made a similar payment in uncontrolled circumstances. We find that this issue is perennial in nature, the TPO has been consistently making TP adjustment in respect of corporate services fee for similar reasons. The co-ordinate bench in appeal

DCIT, C-1(1) , CHANDIGARH vs. M/S FIDELITY INFORMATION SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD., CHANDIGARH

In the result, the cross-objection filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1328/CHANDI/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh07 Jun 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Kalra, Advocate and Ms. Sumisha, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Sharma, CIT DR
Section 37(1)

TP order; the APA Authority, while determining the mark-up as 16.60%. Thus, it is not once but the cost-plus mark-up reimbursement has been verified by the lower authorities at various stages, i.e., TPO, APA and CIT(A). 9.15 It was submitted that the Hon'ble Tribunal while passing the order for assessment years