BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “disallowance”+ Section 801B(10)(C)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai187Delhi55Rajkot35Ahmedabad24Indore23Kolkata22Pune18Hyderabad18Chennai15Guwahati15Bangalore13Chandigarh10Jaipur8Jodhpur4Nagpur4Visakhapatnam3Lucknow3Surat3Dehradun2Ranchi2Karnataka1Agra1Kerala1Amritsar1Raipur1

Key Topics

Section 80I30Section 14A28Deduction10Disallowance10Section 10B8Section 366Addition to Income6Exemption4

ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUDHIANA vs. M/S MRS.BECTORS FOOD SPECILTIES LTD, LUDHIANA

ITA 558/CHANDI/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh21 May 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Subhash AggarwalFor Respondent: Smt. Chandrakanta
Section 14ASection 36Section 80I

10. The income u/s 80IC is exempted only which is derived by an undertaking from the business of manufacturing or producing any article or thing not prohibited by thirteenth schedule of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The nature of income of job charges cannot be treated to have been derived by the undertaking by manufacturing or producing any article

ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUDHIANA vs. M/S MRS.BECTORS FOOD SPECILTIES LTD, LUDHIANA

ITA 559/CHANDI/2017[2013-14]Status: Disposed
ITAT Chandigarh
21 May 2018
AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Subhash AggarwalFor Respondent: Smt. Chandrakanta
Section 14ASection 36Section 80I

10. The income u/s 80IC is exempted only which is derived by an undertaking from the business of manufacturing or producing any article or thing not prohibited by thirteenth schedule of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The nature of income of job charges cannot be treated to have been derived by the undertaking by manufacturing or producing any article

ACIT, LUDHIANA vs. M/S MRS. BECTORS FOOD SPECIALTIES PVT. LTD., LUDHIANA

ITA 405/CHANDI/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh21 May 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Subhash AggarwalFor Respondent: Smt. Chandrakanta
Section 14ASection 36Section 80I

10. The income u/s 80IC is exempted only which is derived by an undertaking from the business of manufacturing or producing any article or thing not prohibited by thirteenth schedule of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The nature of income of job charges cannot be treated to have been derived by the undertaking by manufacturing or producing any article

ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUDHIANA vs. M/S MRS.BECTORS FOOD SPECILTIES LTD, LUDHIANA

ITA 555/CHANDI/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh21 May 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Subhash AggarwalFor Respondent: Smt. Chandrakanta
Section 14ASection 36Section 80I

10. The income u/s 80IC is exempted only which is derived by an undertaking from the business of manufacturing or producing any article or thing not prohibited by thirteenth schedule of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The nature of income of job charges cannot be treated to have been derived by the undertaking by manufacturing or producing any article

ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUDHIANA vs. M/S MRS.BECTORS FOOD SPECILTIES LTD, LUDHIANA

ITA 556/CHANDI/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh21 May 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Subhash AggarwalFor Respondent: Smt. Chandrakanta
Section 14ASection 36Section 80I

10. The income u/s 80IC is exempted only which is derived by an undertaking from the business of manufacturing or producing any article or thing not prohibited by thirteenth schedule of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The nature of income of job charges cannot be treated to have been derived by the undertaking by manufacturing or producing any article

ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUDHIANA vs. M/S MRS.BECTORS FOOD SPECILTIES LTD, LUDHIANA

ITA 557/CHANDI/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh21 May 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Subhash AggarwalFor Respondent: Smt. Chandrakanta
Section 14ASection 36Section 80I

10. The income u/s 80IC is exempted only which is derived by an undertaking from the business of manufacturing or producing any article or thing not prohibited by thirteenth schedule of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The nature of income of job charges cannot be treated to have been derived by the undertaking by manufacturing or producing any article

ACIT, LUDHIANA vs. M/S VARDHMAN TEXTILES LTD., LUDHIANA

ITA 286/CHANDI/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh18 Dec 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Guptaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos. 1429/Chd/2010 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2006-07 Vardhman Textiles Limited, The Addl.Cit, Range- 1, बनाम Ludhiana Chandigarh Road, Ludhiana "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aabcm4692E Appeal Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Ludhiana Dated 15.10.2010

For Appellant: Sh. Subhash Aggarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. G.S. Phani Kishore, CIT DR
Section 10BSection 14A

Section 14A of the Act read with Rule 8D of Income Tax Rules. 9. That the Ld. CIT(A) erred in law and on facts while confirming the action of the Ld.AO in allocating proportionate indirect personnel, administrative and financial expenses amounting to Rs.22.84,306/- to dividend income. 10. That the Ld. C)T(A) erred

VARDHMAN TEXTILES LTD,LUDHIANA vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUDHIANA

ITA 1429/CHANDI/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh18 Dec 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Guptaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos. 1429/Chd/2010 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2006-07 Vardhman Textiles Limited, The Addl.Cit, Range- 1, बनाम Ludhiana Chandigarh Road, Ludhiana "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aabcm4692E Appeal Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Ludhiana Dated 15.10.2010

For Appellant: Sh. Subhash Aggarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. G.S. Phani Kishore, CIT DR
Section 10BSection 14A

Section 14A of the Act read with Rule 8D of Income Tax Rules. 9. That the Ld. CIT(A) erred in law and on facts while confirming the action of the Ld.AO in allocating proportionate indirect personnel, administrative and financial expenses amounting to Rs.22.84,306/- to dividend income. 10. That the Ld. C)T(A) erred

ACIT, LUDHIANA vs. M/S VARDHMAN TEXTILE LIMITED, LUDHIANA

ITA 35/CHANDI/2011[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh18 Dec 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Guptaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos. 1429/Chd/2010 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2006-07 Vardhman Textiles Limited, The Addl.Cit, Range- 1, बनाम Ludhiana Chandigarh Road, Ludhiana "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aabcm4692E Appeal Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Ludhiana Dated 15.10.2010

For Appellant: Sh. Subhash Aggarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. G.S. Phani Kishore, CIT DR
Section 10BSection 14A

Section 14A of the Act read with Rule 8D of Income Tax Rules. 9. That the Ld. CIT(A) erred in law and on facts while confirming the action of the Ld.AO in allocating proportionate indirect personnel, administrative and financial expenses amounting to Rs.22.84,306/- to dividend income. 10. That the Ld. C)T(A) erred

VARDHMAN TEXTILE LTD.,LUDHIANA vs. ADDL. CIT, LUDHIANA

ITA 270/CHANDI/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh18 Dec 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Guptaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos. 1429/Chd/2010 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2006-07 Vardhman Textiles Limited, The Addl.Cit, Range- 1, बनाम Ludhiana Chandigarh Road, Ludhiana "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aabcm4692E Appeal Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Ludhiana Dated 15.10.2010

For Appellant: Sh. Subhash Aggarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. G.S. Phani Kishore, CIT DR
Section 10BSection 14A

Section 14A of the Act read with Rule 8D of Income Tax Rules. 9. That the Ld. CIT(A) erred in law and on facts while confirming the action of the Ld.AO in allocating proportionate indirect personnel, administrative and financial expenses amounting to Rs.22.84,306/- to dividend income. 10. That the Ld. C)T(A) erred