BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

11 results for “disallowance”+ Section 801B(10)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai222Delhi64Rajkot36Ahmedabad28Indore24Kolkata23Pune20Hyderabad20Guwahati18Chennai15Bangalore13Chandigarh11Jaipur10Lucknow7Cochin5Jodhpur4Visakhapatnam4Nagpur4Raipur3Surat3Ranchi2Amritsar2Dehradun2Karnataka1Agra1Kerala1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 80I35Section 14A28Deduction11Disallowance10Section 10B8Addition to Income7Section 366Section 1484Exemption4Section 147

ACIT, LUDHIANA vs. M/S MRS. BECTORS FOOD SPECIALTIES PVT. LTD., LUDHIANA

ITA 405/CHANDI/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh21 May 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Subhash AggarwalFor Respondent: Smt. Chandrakanta
Section 14ASection 36Section 80I

10. The income u/s 80IC is exempted only which is derived by an undertaking from the business of manufacturing or producing any article or thing not prohibited by thirteenth schedule of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The nature of income of job charges cannot be treated to have been derived by the undertaking by manufacturing or producing any article

ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUDHIANA vs. M/S MRS.BECTORS FOOD SPECILTIES LTD, LUDHIANA

ITA 555/CHANDI/2017[2007-08]Status: Disposed
3
ITAT Chandigarh
21 May 2018
AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Subhash AggarwalFor Respondent: Smt. Chandrakanta
Section 14ASection 36Section 80I

10. The income u/s 80IC is exempted only which is derived by an undertaking from the business of manufacturing or producing any article or thing not prohibited by thirteenth schedule of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The nature of income of job charges cannot be treated to have been derived by the undertaking by manufacturing or producing any article

ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUDHIANA vs. M/S MRS.BECTORS FOOD SPECILTIES LTD, LUDHIANA

ITA 556/CHANDI/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh21 May 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Subhash AggarwalFor Respondent: Smt. Chandrakanta
Section 14ASection 36Section 80I

10. The income u/s 80IC is exempted only which is derived by an undertaking from the business of manufacturing or producing any article or thing not prohibited by thirteenth schedule of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The nature of income of job charges cannot be treated to have been derived by the undertaking by manufacturing or producing any article

ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUDHIANA vs. M/S MRS.BECTORS FOOD SPECILTIES LTD, LUDHIANA

ITA 558/CHANDI/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh21 May 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Subhash AggarwalFor Respondent: Smt. Chandrakanta
Section 14ASection 36Section 80I

10. The income u/s 80IC is exempted only which is derived by an undertaking from the business of manufacturing or producing any article or thing not prohibited by thirteenth schedule of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The nature of income of job charges cannot be treated to have been derived by the undertaking by manufacturing or producing any article

ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUDHIANA vs. M/S MRS.BECTORS FOOD SPECILTIES LTD, LUDHIANA

ITA 557/CHANDI/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh21 May 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Subhash AggarwalFor Respondent: Smt. Chandrakanta
Section 14ASection 36Section 80I

10. The income u/s 80IC is exempted only which is derived by an undertaking from the business of manufacturing or producing any article or thing not prohibited by thirteenth schedule of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The nature of income of job charges cannot be treated to have been derived by the undertaking by manufacturing or producing any article

ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUDHIANA vs. M/S MRS.BECTORS FOOD SPECILTIES LTD, LUDHIANA

ITA 559/CHANDI/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh21 May 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Subhash AggarwalFor Respondent: Smt. Chandrakanta
Section 14ASection 36Section 80I

10. The income u/s 80IC is exempted only which is derived by an undertaking from the business of manufacturing or producing any article or thing not prohibited by thirteenth schedule of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The nature of income of job charges cannot be treated to have been derived by the undertaking by manufacturing or producing any article

VARDHMAN TEXTILE LTD.,LUDHIANA vs. ADDL. CIT, LUDHIANA

ITA 270/CHANDI/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh18 Dec 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Guptaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos. 1429/Chd/2010 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2006-07 Vardhman Textiles Limited, The Addl.Cit, Range- 1, बनाम Ludhiana Chandigarh Road, Ludhiana "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aabcm4692E Appeal Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Ludhiana Dated 15.10.2010

For Appellant: Sh. Subhash Aggarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. G.S. Phani Kishore, CIT DR
Section 10BSection 14A

section 14A of The Income Tax Act w.r.t. dividend income earned by the assessee. 8. That the Ld. CIT(A) erred in law and on the facts while confirming the action of Ld.AO for disallowing foreign traveling expenses of wife of Chairman & Managing Director amounting to Rs. 11,46,863/-. 9. That the Ld. CIT(A) erred

ACIT, LUDHIANA vs. M/S VARDHMAN TEXTILES LTD., LUDHIANA

ITA 286/CHANDI/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh18 Dec 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Guptaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos. 1429/Chd/2010 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2006-07 Vardhman Textiles Limited, The Addl.Cit, Range- 1, बनाम Ludhiana Chandigarh Road, Ludhiana "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aabcm4692E Appeal Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Ludhiana Dated 15.10.2010

For Appellant: Sh. Subhash Aggarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. G.S. Phani Kishore, CIT DR
Section 10BSection 14A

section 14A of The Income Tax Act w.r.t. dividend income earned by the assessee. 8. That the Ld. CIT(A) erred in law and on the facts while confirming the action of Ld.AO for disallowing foreign traveling expenses of wife of Chairman & Managing Director amounting to Rs. 11,46,863/-. 9. That the Ld. CIT(A) erred

VARDHMAN TEXTILES LTD,LUDHIANA vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUDHIANA

ITA 1429/CHANDI/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh18 Dec 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Guptaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos. 1429/Chd/2010 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2006-07 Vardhman Textiles Limited, The Addl.Cit, Range- 1, बनाम Ludhiana Chandigarh Road, Ludhiana "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aabcm4692E Appeal Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Ludhiana Dated 15.10.2010

For Appellant: Sh. Subhash Aggarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. G.S. Phani Kishore, CIT DR
Section 10BSection 14A

section 14A of The Income Tax Act w.r.t. dividend income earned by the assessee. 8. That the Ld. CIT(A) erred in law and on the facts while confirming the action of Ld.AO for disallowing foreign traveling expenses of wife of Chairman & Managing Director amounting to Rs. 11,46,863/-. 9. That the Ld. CIT(A) erred

ACIT, LUDHIANA vs. M/S VARDHMAN TEXTILE LIMITED, LUDHIANA

ITA 35/CHANDI/2011[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh18 Dec 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Guptaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos. 1429/Chd/2010 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2006-07 Vardhman Textiles Limited, The Addl.Cit, Range- 1, बनाम Ludhiana Chandigarh Road, Ludhiana "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aabcm4692E Appeal Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Ludhiana Dated 15.10.2010

For Appellant: Sh. Subhash Aggarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. G.S. Phani Kishore, CIT DR
Section 10BSection 14A

section 14A of The Income Tax Act w.r.t. dividend income earned by the assessee. 8. That the Ld. CIT(A) erred in law and on the facts while confirming the action of Ld.AO for disallowing foreign traveling expenses of wife of Chairman & Managing Director amounting to Rs. 11,46,863/-. 9. That the Ld. CIT(A) erred

ETHIX HEALTHCARE,CHANDIGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE , PARWANOO

In the result, both on the exercise of jurisdiction u/s 147 and on merits of the case, the order of the AO as well as the ld CIT(A) is hereby set-aside and matter is decided in favour of the assessee

ITA 501/CHANDI/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh17 Dec 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri VivekVardhan, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 139Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 80Section 80I

801B of the Act. In this judgment, the Hon'ble Court also considered the question as to whether such remissions should be set off against the cost of purchases. The Court held that duty drawback, rebates etc. cannot be credited against the cost of manufacture for the purposes of section 80-IC of the Act, as such, credits would constitute