BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “disallowance”+ Section 801A(10)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai231Delhi173Ahmedabad99Hyderabad96Kolkata63Chennai44Bangalore37Indore23Pune22Rajkot19Jaipur18Nagpur12Surat10Patna10Chandigarh9Dehradun7Cuttack7Lucknow6Jodhpur6Raipur5Guwahati4Cochin4Amritsar3Calcutta1Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 80I9Section 14A6Section 2635Section 143(3)4Disallowance2Revision u/s 2632

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH vs. UNIPRO TECHNO INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the order of the ld CIT(A) is confirmed and the grounds of appeal taken by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 693/CHANDI/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh03 Sept 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, Advocate and Shri A.K. Sood, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 263Section 80I

disallowance under section 80IA and allowing the necessary relief to the assessee. It was further submitted that the order so passed by the Coordinate Bench are not just in relation to revisionary proceedings but the issue on merits has already been discussed and in this regard, our reference was drawn to the order passed by the Coordinate Bench

DCIT, C-1(1), CHANDIGARH vs. UNIPRO TECHNO INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED, CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed

ITA 149/CHANDI/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh23 Dec 2020AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sandip Dahiya, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263

801A. 10. Relying upon the above documents Ld. counsel for the assessee stated that relevant queries relating to eligibility of the claim of assessee of deduction under section 80IA was raised by the Assessing Officer during assessment proceedings, due reply was filed by the assessee after considering which and after applying his mind to which the assessing officer passed

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATIALA vs. DSG PAPERS PVT. LTD., PATIALA

In the result, respective appeals are disposed off in light of aforesaid\ndirection

ITA 768/CHANDI/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Feb 2025AY 2014-15

disallowed and further, argued that the detailed submissions were filed before the Ld. CIT(A) and the same is reproduced at page no. 57 of his order and all conditions of the deduction u/s 801A has been fulfilled and relied upon the order for AY 2017-18 of the Ld. CIT(A), which has been referred

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATIALA vs. DSG PAPERS PVT. LTD., PATIALA

In the result, respective appeals are disposed off in light of aforesaid direction

ITA 18/CHANDI/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Feb 2025AY 2020-21

disallowed and further, argued that the detailed submissions were filed before the Ld. CIT(A) and the same is reproduced at page no. 57 of his order and all conditions of the deduction u/s 801A has been fulfilled and relied upon the order for AY 2017-18 of the Ld. CIT(A), which has been referred

DSG PAPERS PVT LTD #6, GREEN VIEW COLONY,PATIALA vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE PATIALA, PATIALA

In the result, respective appeals are disposed off in light of aforesaid\ndirection

ITA 788/CHANDI/2023[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Feb 2025AY 2020-2021

disallowed and further, argued that the detailed submissions were filed before the Ld. CIT(A) and the same is reproduced at page no. 57 of his order and all conditions of the deduction u/s 801A has been fulfilled and relied upon the order for AY 2017-18 of the Ld. CIT(A), which has been referred

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATIALA vs. DSG PAPERS PVT. LTD., PATIALA

In the result, respective appeals are disposed off in light of aforesaid\ndirection

ITA 766/CHANDI/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Feb 2025AY 2015-16

disallowed and further, argued that the detailed\nsubmissions were filed before the Ld. CIT(A) and the same is reproduced at\npage no. 57 of his order and all conditions of the deduction u/s 801A has\nbeen fulfilled and relied upon the order for AY 2017-18 of the Ld. CIT(A),\nwhich has been referred

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, PATIALA, PATIALA vs. DSG PAPERS PVT. LTD., PATIALA

In the result, respective appeals are disposed off in light of aforesaid\ndirection

ITA 765/CHANDI/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

disallowed and further, argued that the detailed\nsubmissions were filed before the Ld. CIT(A) and the same is reproduced at\npage no. 57 of his order and all conditions of the deduction u/s 801A has\nbeen fulfilled and relied upon the order for AY 2017-18 of the Ld. CIT(A),\nwhich has been referred

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATIALA vs. DSG PAPERS PVT. LTD., PATIALA

In the result, respective appeals are disposed off in light of aforesaid\ndirection

ITA 761/CHANDI/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Feb 2025AY 2019-20

disallowed and further, argued that the detailed\nsubmissions were filed before the Ld. CIT(A) and the same is reproduced at\npage no. 57 of his order and all conditions of the deduction u/s 801A has\nbeen fulfilled and relied upon the order for AY 2017-18 of the Ld. CIT(A),\nwhich has been referred

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATIALA vs. DSG PAPERS PVT. LTD., PATIALA

In the result, respective appeals are disposed off in light of aforesaid\ndirection

ITA 764/CHANDI/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Feb 2025AY 2016-17

disallowed and further, argued that the detailed\nsubmissions were filed before the Ld. CIT(A) and the same is reproduced at\npage no. 57 of his order and all conditions of the deduction u/s 801A has\nbeen fulfilled and relied upon the order for AY 2017-18 of the Ld. CIT(A),\nwhich has been referred