Search: disallowance

1 result for “disallowance”+ Section 54Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai22 Delhi19 Bangalore10 Jaipur9 Kolkata7 Ahmedabad5 Agra5 Karnataka4 Pune4 Rajkot3 Jodhpur2 Hyderabad2 Indore2 Chennai2 Raipur1 Chandigarh1 Surat1 Cuttack1 Amritsar1 SC1 Visakhapatnam1 Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 54F7 Section 54B3

ITO, W-4, PANCHKULA vs. SMT. SEEMA BISHNOI, PANCHKULA

In the result appeal of the Department is dismissed

ITA 103/CHANDI/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh20 Feb 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Sanjay Gargthe Ito Vs. Smt. Seema Bishnoi Ward-4, Panchkula H.No. 906, Sec-08, Panchkula

For Appellant: Shri. A.K. Jindal, CAFor Respondent: Shri. G.S. Phani Kishore, CI TDR

Section 148Section 54BSection 54F

54D and 54F in the return. The Assessing Officer denied exemption claimed on ground that assessee had mentioned wrong sections while claiming exemption. Held where due to ignorance wrong section had been mentioned by assessee in return. On appeal the Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer was required to advise assessee about correct claim and also to assess tax legitimately