BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 35Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi5Chandigarh4Nagpur4Calcutta2Kolkata2Jaipur1Cochin1Ahmedabad1Mumbai1

Key Topics

Section 153A3Section 1323Section 153D3Section 1273Deemed Dividend3Section 542

SCOTT EDIL ADVANCE RESEARCH LABORATORIES AND EDUCATION LIMITED,CHANDIGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH

ITA 845/CHANDI/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh03 Mar 2025AY 2017-18
Section 127Section 132Section 153ASection 153D

disallowances resulting in enhanced profits should still be eligible\nfor deduction under Chapter VI-A.\n78. The ld. Counsel has further contended that the department failed to apply the\nprinciple of telescoping, which allows for adjusting alleged undisclosed income against\nunexplained investments or expenditures. That, if the short stock was considered as sales\noutside the books, then the cash generated

SCOTT EDIL PHARMACIA LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH

ITA 833/CHANDI/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh03 Mar 2025AY 2017-18
Section 127Section 132Section 153ASection 153D

section 158BD calling upon assessee to file return of undisclosed income\nfor block period 1-4-1989 to 28-1-2000 - Thereafter, valuation of cost of construction of\nbuildings constructed by assessee-firm was referred to DVO, for valuation under section\n133(6) - Assessing Officer added difference in valuation of cost of construction adopted\nby assessee-firm

MAXPORT INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,CHANDIGARH vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

ITA 583/CHANDI/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh03 Mar 2025AY 2015-16
Section 127Section 132Section 153ASection 153D

section 158BD calling upon assessee to file return of undisclosed income\nfor block period 1-4-1989 to 28-1-2000 - Thereafter, valuation of cost of construction of\nbuildings constructed by assessee-firm was referred to DVO, for valuation under section\n133(6) - Assessing Officer added difference in valuation of cost of construction adopted\nby assessee-firm

SH. PARAM PAUL SINGH,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT (INTL. TAXATION), CIRCLE, CHANDIGARH

Appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 198/CHANDI/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh04 Jun 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini, Vice- & Shri S.S.Godara, Judicialmember Assessment Year:2009-10

For Appellant: Shri Tejmohan Singh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shr Manjit Singh, CIT-DR
Section 144Section 54Section 69

section 54 can only be made by filing the return. The quantification of that claim has to be made in the return itself and that quantification and eligibility has to be assessed by the A.O. Since the assessee has not filed the return in this case, the issue relating to eligibility to claim u/s. 54 do not arise