BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 35Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi29Mumbai17Ahmedabad11Pune10Bangalore7Jaipur6SC3Chandigarh2Kolkata2Cuttack2Punjab & Haryana2Jabalpur1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 107Section 14A3Section 1542

ACIT, C-4(1), CHANDIGARH vs. THE PUNJAB STATE CO-OP. SUPPLY AND MARKETING FEDERATION LTD., CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed

ITA 998/CHANDI/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh28 Feb 2022AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri Aman Parti, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sarabjeet Singh, CIT,DR
Section 14A

35B, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAAAT3454G अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Aman Parti, Advocate राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Shri Sarabjeet Singh, CIT,DR सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing : 28/02/2022 उदघोषणा क" तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement : 28/02/2022 आदेश/Order PER N.K. SAINI, VICE PRESIDENT This

ARUN DHIR,CHANDIGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 97/CHANDI/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh
11 Sept 2025
AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 97/Chd/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 Shri Arun Dhir, Vs The Dcit, House No.1150, Sector 21-B, Circle-1, Chandigarh. Sector 17,Chandigarh. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aarpd0180F अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessee By : Shri Pankaj Bhalla, C.A. Revenue By : Shri Vivek Vardhan, Addl. Cit Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing : 29.07.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 11.09.2025

For Appellant: Shri Pankaj Bhalla, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Addl. CIT Sr.DR
Section 10Section 143(3)Section 15Section 154

disallowed. This application has been dismissed by the AO. 4. Appeal to the CIT (Appeals) did not bring any relief to the assessee. A.Y.2013-14 3 5. With the assistance of ld. Representative, we have gone through the record carefully. It emerges out from the record that assessee was an employee of M/s Ranbaxy Laboratories and worked for 25 years. According