PARAMJIT SINGH,SIRSA vs. PR.CIT, ROHTAK

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

263 in extreme haste and without affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the appellant. 2. That the appellant craves leave for any addition, deletion or amendment in the grounds of appeal on or before the disposal of the same. 4. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual who filed his original return

SH. AMARJEET SINGH,SIRSA vs. PR.CIT, ROHTAK

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

263 in extreme haste and without affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the appellant. 2. That the appellant craves leave for any addition, deletion or amendment in the grounds of appeal on or before the disposal of the same. 4. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual who filed his original return

INDER KAUR,SIRSA vs. PR.CIT, ROHTAK

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

263 in extreme haste and without affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the appellant. 2. That the appellant craves leave for any addition, deletion or amendment in the grounds of appeal on or before the disposal of the same. 4. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual who filed his original return

PARVEEN KUMAR,229,VILLAGE MANAKPUR-II,TEHSIL JAGADHRI,HARYANA vs. PRABHJOT KAUR,PCIT PANCHKULA, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

Bench: the Tribunal as pointed out by the Registry. Considering that the issue involved is purely legal in nature, and respectfully following the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Collector, Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji & Others [(1987) 167 ITR 471 (SC)], which emphasizes that substantial justice should prevail over technical considerations, we condone the delay in filing these appeals.3. We shall take appeal of the assessee in ITA No. 167/Chd/2023 for A.Y 2018-19 as a lead case f

263 in extreme haste and without affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the appellant. 2. That the appellant craves leave for any addition, deletion or amendment in the grounds of appeal on or before the disposal of the same. 4. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual who filed his original return

SH. BALJINDER SINGH,CHANDIGARH vs. PR.CIT, CHANDIGARH -1, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

263 in extreme haste and without affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the appellant. 2. That the appellant craves leave for any addition, deletion or amendment in the grounds of appeal on or before the disposal of the same. 4. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual who filed his original return

RAM NIWAS,FATEHABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX OFFICE, SIRSA ROAD, INDUSTRIAL AREA, FATEHABAD

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

263 in extreme haste and without affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the appellant. 2. That the appellant craves leave for any addition, deletion or amendment in the grounds of appeal on or before the disposal of the same. 4. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual who filed his original return

MANINDER JEET SINGH V.P.O. UDHAMGARH,JAGADHRI,HARYANA vs. PRABHJOT KAUR,PCIT, PANCHKULA

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

263 in extreme haste and without affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the appellant. 2. That the appellant craves leave for any addition, deletion or amendment in the grounds of appeal on or before the disposal of the same. 4. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual who filed his original return

ANIL TUTEJA,FATEHABAD vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ROHTAK, ROHTAK

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

Bench: BEFORE: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

263 in extreme haste and without affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the appellant. 2. That the appellant craves leave for any addition, deletion or amendment in the grounds of appeal on or before the disposal of the same. 4. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual who filed his original return

KARAN PRATAP SINGH,SIRSA, HARYANA vs. ITO, WARD-1, SIRSA, HARYANA

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

263 in extreme haste and without affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the appellant. 2. That the appellant craves leave for any addition, deletion or amendment in the grounds of appeal on or before the disposal of the same. 4. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual who filed his original return

MADHU GREWAL,CHANDIGARH vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH-1, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

Bench: the Tribunal as pointed out by the Registry. Considering that the issue involved is purely legal in nature, and respectfully following the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Collector, Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji & Others [(1987) 167 ITR 471 (SC)], which emphasizes that substantial justice should prevail over technical considerations, we condone the delay in filing these appeals.3. We shall take appeal of the assessee in ITA No. 167/Chd/2023 for A.Y 2018-19 as a lead case f

263 in extreme haste and without affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the appellant. 2. That the appellant craves leave for any addition, deletion or amendment in the grounds of appeal on or before the disposal of the same. 4. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual who filed his original return

RAKESH KUMAR,JAGADHRI vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANCHKULA

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

263 in extreme haste and without affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the appellant. 2. That the appellant craves leave for any addition, deletion or amendment in the grounds of appeal on or before the disposal of the same. 4. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual who filed his original return

ASHOK KUMAR THAKRAL,JAGADHRI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANCHKULA , PANCHKULA

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

Bench: the Tribunal as pointed out by the Registry. Considering that the issue involved is purely legal in nature, and respectfully following the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Collector, Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji & Others [(1987) 167 ITR 471 (SC)], which emphasizes that substantial justice should prevail over technical considerations, we condone the delay in filing these appeals.3. We shall take appeal of the assessee in ITA No. 167/Chd/2023 for A.Y 2018-19 as a lead case f

263 in extreme haste and without affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the appellant. 2. That the appellant craves leave for any addition, deletion or amendment in the grounds of appeal on or before the disposal of the same. 4. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual who filed his original return

SH. GURDEEP SINGH MAHAL,SIRSA vs. PR.CIT, ROHTAK

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

263 in extreme haste and without affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the appellant. 2. That the appellant craves leave for any addition, deletion or amendment in the grounds of appeal on or before the disposal of the same. 4. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual who filed his original return

SH. DEVENDER KUMAR,YAMUNA NAGAR vs. ITO, WARD -1, YAMUNA NAGAR

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

263 in extreme haste and without affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the appellant. 2. That the appellant craves leave for any addition, deletion or amendment in the grounds of appeal on or before the disposal of the same. 4. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual who filed his original return

KARTAR SINGH, FATEHABAD vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ROHTAK

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

263 in extreme haste and without affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the appellant. 2. That the appellant craves leave for any addition, deletion or amendment in the grounds of appeal on or before the disposal of the same. 4. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual who filed his original return

SH. RAM LAL,FATEHABAD vs. PR.CIT, ROHTAK

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

263 in extreme haste and without affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the appellant. 2. That the appellant craves leave for any addition, deletion or amendment in the grounds of appeal on or before the disposal of the same. 4. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual who filed his original return

MUNISH KUMAR LEGAL HEIR LATE SH GURDEEP SINGH,VILL MANAKPUR, YAMUNANAGAR vs. ITO, WARD 5, YAMUNANAGAR

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

263 in extreme haste and without affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the appellant. 2. That the appellant craves leave for any addition, deletion or amendment in the grounds of appeal on or before the disposal of the same. 4. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual who filed his original return

BIMLA DEVI,JAGADHRI vs. PR.CIT, ROHTAK

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

263 in extreme haste and without affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the appellant. 2. That the appellant craves leave for any addition, deletion or amendment in the grounds of appeal on or before the disposal of the same. 4. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual who filed his original return