Search: disallowance

14 results for “disallowance”+ Section 194Hclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 4019 Section 194H17 Disallowance13 Section 143(3)12 Section 194Q12 Deduction12 TDS12 Section 14810 Section 194C10 Addition to Income

SH.ANIL DHIWAN S/O SH.A.K.DHWAN vs. DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MANDI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1298/CHANDI/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh17 Jul 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Guptash.Anil Dhawan, S/O Sh.A.K.Dhawan, Vs. The D.C.I.T., Moti Bazar, Mandi, Distt. Mandi (H.P.) Circle-Mandi (H.P.) Pan: Aejpd7188M (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: S/Shri Ashwani Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Smt.Chanderkanta, Addl.CIT, DR

Section 194Section 194HSection 250(6)Section 40

section 194H of the Act and, therefore, the said expenses were liable to be disallowed as per the provisions of section

SH.ANIL DHIWAN S/O SH.A.K.DHWAN vs. DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MANDI

SH.ANIL DHIWAN S/O SH.A.K.DHWAN vs. DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MANDI

PUNJAB SMALL INDUSTRIES AND EXPORT CORPORATION LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

MADAN LAL,MANDI DABWALI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, SIRSA

MADAN LAL,MANDI DABWALI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, SIRSA

MUKESH MALHOTRA ,SHIMLA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, SHIMLA, SHIMLA

MUKESH MALHOTRA ,SHIMLA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , SHIMLA

MUKESH MALHOTRA ,SHIMLA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , SHIMLA

MUKESH MALHOTRA,SHIMLA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , SHIMLA

MUKESH MALHOTRA ,SHIMLA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , SHIMLA

M/S PUNJAB CHEMICALS & CROP. PROTECTION LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. ADDL. CIT, CHANDIGARH

PUNJAB CHEMICALS & CROP. PROTECTION LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, CHANDIGARH

PRIYANKA GUPTA,FIRST INDUSTRIAL AREA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, AAYAKAR BHAWAN

M/S CHITTOSHO MOTORS,PATIALA vs. THE ADDL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATIALA

SHARMANJI YARNS PRIVATE LIMITED,LUDHIANA vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, LUDHIANA, LUDHIANA