BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

64 results for “disallowance”+ Section 135clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,040Delhi894Bangalore297Ahmedabad227Kolkata207Chennai190Jaipur171Hyderabad149Cochin147Pune139Indore101Raipur73Chandigarh64Surat59Visakhapatnam58Cuttack42Amritsar40Lucknow38Nagpur38Calcutta37Allahabad29Rajkot28Karnataka28Guwahati23Ranchi17Varanasi9SC8Telangana7Agra6Dehradun5Jabalpur5Panaji4Jodhpur4Punjab & Haryana3Patna3Rajasthan1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)44Addition to Income29Section 26324Section 13(3)24Section 14A22Disallowance17Section 143(1)16Exemption15Section 80I14

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, LUDHAINA vs. HOMELAND CITY PROJECT LTD, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 559/CHANDI/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh17 Dec 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Sharma, CIT DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 37

disallowance has been made as per Section 37(1) of the Act, therefore it is relevant to reproduce the section 37(1) of the Act as under: Quote 37. (1) Any expenditure (not being expenditure of the nature described in sections 30 to 36 and not being in the nature of capital expenditure or personal expenses of the assessee). laid

M/S GLAXOSMITHKLINE ASIA PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. DCIT, CHANDIGARH

Showing 1–20 of 64 · Page 1 of 4

Deduction12
Section 119
Section 250(6)9

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 532/CHANDI/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Jul 2021AY 2006-07
For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr.AdvFor Respondent: Smt. C. Chandrakanta, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 250(6)

135 (Delhi HC) [Pg. 43-45 of PB-CL for AY 2004-05 & 2005-06] - IAC v. Consolidated Pneumatic Tool Co. (India) Ltd.: 14 1TD 564 (Bom. Tribunal) - Wipro Limited vs. DCIT : 96 TTJ 211 (Bangalore Tribunal). - Samsung India Electronics Limited (ITA No. 3734/Del/2002) (Delhi Tribunal) - Jet Airways India (P) Ltd. vs CIT (in 4228/M/2000 for assessment year

DCIT, C-1(1), CHANDIGARH vs. UNIPRO TECHNO INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED, CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed

ITA 149/CHANDI/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh23 Dec 2020AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sandip Dahiya, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263

section 14A or Rule 8D does not depend on earning of income as held by Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Rajender Prasad Moody (1978), 115 ITR 519. 4. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in following the decisions of Hon'ble High Courts whose facts were distinguishable from the taxpayers, ignoring the principal of apportionment regardless

M/S SJVN LTD. ( FORMERLY SATLUJ JAL VIDYUT NIGAM LIMITED),SHIMLA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE, SHIMLA

ITA 834/CHANDI/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh28 Mar 2019AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Sood, CAFor Respondent: Smt.Mona Mohanti, CIT DR
Section 250(6)

disallowance is restricted to the expenses incurred by the assessee under a statutory obligation under section ITA No.826,827,834 & 835/Chd/2018 9 A.Ys.2013-14 & 2014-15 135

M/S SJVN LTD. ( FORMERLY SATLUJ JAL VIDYUT NIGAM LIMITED),SHIMLA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE, SHIMLA

ITA 835/CHANDI/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh28 Mar 2019AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Sood, CAFor Respondent: Smt.Mona Mohanti, CIT DR
Section 250(6)

disallowance is restricted to the expenses incurred by the assessee under a statutory obligation under section ITA No.826,827,834 & 835/Chd/2018 9 A.Ys.2013-14 & 2014-15 135

ACIT, CIRCLE, SHIMLA vs. M/S SATLUJ JAL VIDYUT NIGAM LIMITED, SHIMLA

ITA 827/CHANDI/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh28 Mar 2019AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Sood, CAFor Respondent: Smt.Mona Mohanti, CIT DR
Section 250(6)

disallowance is restricted to the expenses incurred by the assessee under a statutory obligation under section ITA No.826,827,834 & 835/Chd/2018 9 A.Ys.2013-14 & 2014-15 135

DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S MANAV MANGAL SOCIETY, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the department are dismissed

ITA 29/CHANDI/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 May 2021AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Dahiya, CIT-DR
Section 13(3)

disallowed by the AO have in fact been found to be actively engaged in rendering their respective services as is proved from the fact that during the course of survey on the assessee and the post survey enquiries, ail these parties have given their statements vis- a- vi s the salary being drawn by them from the Society

M/S MANAV MANGAL SOCIETY,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the department are dismissed

ITA 2/CHANDI/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 May 2021AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Dahiya, CIT-DR
Section 13(3)

disallowed by the AO have in fact been found to be actively engaged in rendering their respective services as is proved from the fact that during the course of survey on the assessee and the post survey enquiries, ail these parties have given their statements vis- a- vi s the salary being drawn by them from the Society

DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S MANAV MANGAL SOCIETY, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the department are dismissed

ITA 30/CHANDI/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 May 2021AY 2016-17
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Dahiya, CIT-DR
Section 13(3)

disallowed by the AO have in fact been found to be actively engaged in rendering their respective services as is proved from the fact that during the course of survey on the assessee and the post survey enquiries, ail these parties have given their statements vis- a- vi s the salary being drawn by them from the Society

DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S MANAV MANGAL SOCIETY, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the department are dismissed

ITA 137/CHANDI/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 May 2021AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Dahiya, CIT-DR
Section 13(3)

disallowed by the AO have in fact been found to be actively engaged in rendering their respective services as is proved from the fact that during the course of survey on the assessee and the post survey enquiries, ail these parties have given their statements vis- a- vi s the salary being drawn by them from the Society

DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S MANAV MANGAL SOCIETY, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the department are dismissed

ITA 136/CHANDI/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 May 2021AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Dahiya, CIT-DR
Section 13(3)

disallowed by the AO have in fact been found to be actively engaged in rendering their respective services as is proved from the fact that during the course of survey on the assessee and the post survey enquiries, ail these parties have given their statements vis- a- vi s the salary being drawn by them from the Society

M/S MANAV MANGAL SOCIETY,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the department are dismissed

ITA 3/CHANDI/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 May 2021AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Dahiya, CIT-DR
Section 13(3)

disallowed by the AO have in fact been found to be actively engaged in rendering their respective services as is proved from the fact that during the course of survey on the assessee and the post survey enquiries, ail these parties have given their statements vis- a- vi s the salary being drawn by them from the Society

DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S MANAV MANGAL SOCIETY, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the department are dismissed

ITA 28/CHANDI/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 May 2021AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Dahiya, CIT-DR
Section 13(3)

disallowed by the AO have in fact been found to be actively engaged in rendering their respective services as is proved from the fact that during the course of survey on the assessee and the post survey enquiries, ail these parties have given their statements vis- a- vi s the salary being drawn by them from the Society

DCIT,CIRCLE-1(EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S MANAV MANGAL SCHOOL( MANAV MANGAL SOCIETY), CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the department are dismissed

ITA 27/CHANDI/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 May 2021AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Dahiya, CIT-DR
Section 13(3)

disallowed by the AO have in fact been found to be actively engaged in rendering their respective services as is proved from the fact that during the course of survey on the assessee and the post survey enquiries, ail these parties have given their statements vis- a- vi s the salary being drawn by them from the Society

GLAXOSMITHKLINE ASIA (P) LTD.,GURGAON vs. ACIT, CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1323/CHANDI/2012[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh28 Sept 2018AY 2003-04
For Appellant: Sh. Neeraj Jain (C.A), Sh. Abhishek Mukherjee (C.A)For Respondent: Dr. Gulshan Raj
Section 143(3)

disallowance for provision made for damaged stock - useless / obsolete stock made by the lower authorities. To the same effect are the following decisions rendered by the Courts: - CIT v. Hughes Communication India Ltd.: 215 Taxman 136 (Del) - CIT v Becton Dickinson India (P.) Ltd.: 214 Taxman 636 (Del) - CIT v Bharat Commerce & Industries Ltd.: 107 Taxman 135 (Del) - Jet Airways

M/S PUNJAB TOURISM DEVELOPMENET CORPORATION LIMITED,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-1(1), CHANDIGARH

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 142/CHANDI/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh18 Nov 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Ao)

For Appellant: Sh.Tejmohan Singh, Adv. and Sh. Vineet Khurana, C. AFor Respondent: Sh.Vivek Vardhan, JCIT, Sr. D. R
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 253

135 of the Companies Act. 2013 (10 of 2013) shall not be claimed to be an expenditure incurredby the assessee for the purposes of the business or professions.” 5.2.1. From above, it is well established that for the purpose of claiming deduction under section 37(1) of the Act, expenditure should be incurred for the purpose of the business which

M/S PUNJAB TOURISM DEVELOPMENET CORPORATION LIMITED,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-1(1), CHANDIGARH

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 140/CHANDI/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh18 Nov 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Ao)

For Appellant: Sh.Tejmohan Singh, Adv. and Sh. Vineet Khurana, C. AFor Respondent: Sh.Vivek Vardhan, JCIT, Sr. D. R
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 253

135 of the Companies Act. 2013 (10 of 2013) shall not be claimed to be an expenditure incurredby the assessee for the purposes of the business or professions.” 5.2.1. From above, it is well established that for the purpose of claiming deduction under section 37(1) of the Act, expenditure should be incurred for the purpose of the business which

M/S PUNJAB TOURISM DEVELOPMENET CORPORATION LIMITED,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-1(1), CHANDIGARH

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 141/CHANDI/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh18 Nov 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Ao)

For Appellant: Sh.Tejmohan Singh, Adv. and Sh. Vineet Khurana, C. AFor Respondent: Sh.Vivek Vardhan, JCIT, Sr. D. R
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 253

135 of the Companies Act. 2013 (10 of 2013) shall not be claimed to be an expenditure incurredby the assessee for the purposes of the business or professions.” 5.2.1. From above, it is well established that for the purpose of claiming deduction under section 37(1) of the Act, expenditure should be incurred for the purpose of the business which

M/S PUNJAB TOURISM DEVELOPMENET CORPORATION LIMITED,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-1(1), CHANDIGARH

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 139/CHANDI/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh18 Nov 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Ao)

For Appellant: Sh.Tejmohan Singh, Adv. and Sh. Vineet Khurana, C. AFor Respondent: Sh.Vivek Vardhan, JCIT, Sr. D. R
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 253

135 of the Companies Act. 2013 (10 of 2013) shall not be claimed to be an expenditure incurredby the assessee for the purposes of the business or professions.” 5.2.1. From above, it is well established that for the purpose of claiming deduction under section 37(1) of the Act, expenditure should be incurred for the purpose of the business which

ACIT, CIRCLE 1(1), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S SML ISUZU LTD., CHANDIGARH

In the result, the impugned order is sustained and appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 611/CHANDI/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Aug 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Jain, Advocate and Ms. Somya Jain, C.AFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum, CIT, DR
Section 1Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 145Section 250Section 251Section 253Section 43B

disallowed by the Assessing Officer in the order under section 143(3) on the basis of observations of the accountant in his report in Form 3CD, has been deposited before due date of filing of ITR u/s 139(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961 merely on the basis of a bald certificate issued by a C.A. (v) The appellant craves