BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

111 results for “disallowance”+ Revision u/s 263clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,236Delhi694Kolkata478Chennai438Bangalore393Ahmedabad208Pune157Hyderabad117Chandigarh111Jaipur107Rajkot99Indore95Surat73Raipur53Panaji42Lucknow34Visakhapatnam31Cochin30Nagpur28Agra25Jodhpur21Allahabad20Cuttack16Amritsar16Patna10Karnataka7Dehradun7Jabalpur6Kerala3Guwahati3Ranchi3Punjab & Haryana1SC1Rajasthan1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 263218Section 143(3)82Section 14749Section 80I45Section 14840Addition to Income33Deduction26Disallowance25Revision u/s 26324Section 143(2)

PARAMJIT SINGH,SIRSA vs. PR.CIT, ROHTAK

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

ITA 327/CHANDI/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, C.A (Virtual)For Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR

revised on 19.01.2019 declaring income of Rs.7,81,320/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and assessment was completed by the Faceless Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) read with sections 143(3A) and 143(3B) of the Act on 11.12.2020, accepting the returned income without making any addition or disallowance. 5. On examination of assessment records

MANINDER JEET SINGH V.P.O. UDHAMGARH,JAGADHRI,HARYANA vs. PRABHJOT KAUR,PCIT, PANCHKULA

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

ITA 575/CHANDI/2024[2018-2019]Status: Disposed

Showing 1–20 of 111 · Page 1 of 6

20
Section 80P18
Section 234D15
ITAT Chandigarh
11 Feb 2026
AY 2018-2019
For Appellant: Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, C.A (Virtual)For Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR

revised on 19.01.2019 declaring income of Rs.7,81,320/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and assessment was completed by the Faceless Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) read with sections 143(3A) and 143(3B) of the Act on 11.12.2020, accepting the returned income without making any addition or disallowance. 5. On examination of assessment records

SH. AMARJEET SINGH,SIRSA vs. PR.CIT, ROHTAK

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

ITA 325/CHANDI/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, C.A (Virtual)For Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR

revised on 19.01.2019 declaring income of Rs.7,81,320/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and assessment was completed by the Faceless Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) read with sections 143(3A) and 143(3B) of the Act on 11.12.2020, accepting the returned income without making any addition or disallowance. 5. On examination of assessment records

INDER KAUR,SIRSA vs. PR.CIT, ROHTAK

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

ITA 326/CHANDI/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, C.A (Virtual)For Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR

revised on 19.01.2019 declaring income of Rs.7,81,320/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and assessment was completed by the Faceless Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) read with sections 143(3A) and 143(3B) of the Act on 11.12.2020, accepting the returned income without making any addition or disallowance. 5. On examination of assessment records

BIMLA DEVI,JAGADHRI vs. PR.CIT, ROHTAK

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

ITA 328/CHANDI/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, C.A (Virtual)For Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR

revised on 19.01.2019 declaring income of Rs.7,81,320/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and assessment was completed by the Faceless Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) read with sections 143(3A) and 143(3B) of the Act on 11.12.2020, accepting the returned income without making any addition or disallowance. 5. On examination of assessment records

SH. RAM LAL,FATEHABAD vs. PR.CIT, ROHTAK

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

ITA 332/CHANDI/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, C.A (Virtual)For Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR

revised on 19.01.2019 declaring income of Rs.7,81,320/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and assessment was completed by the Faceless Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) read with sections 143(3A) and 143(3B) of the Act on 11.12.2020, accepting the returned income without making any addition or disallowance. 5. On examination of assessment records

SH. BALJINDER SINGH,CHANDIGARH vs. PR.CIT, CHANDIGARH -1, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

ITA 167/CHANDI/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, C.A (Virtual)For Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR

revised on 19.01.2019 declaring income of Rs.7,81,320/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and assessment was completed by the Faceless Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) read with sections 143(3A) and 143(3B) of the Act on 11.12.2020, accepting the returned income without making any addition or disallowance. 5. On examination of assessment records

SH. GURDEEP SINGH MAHAL,SIRSA vs. PR.CIT, ROHTAK

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

ITA 233/CHANDI/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, C.A (Virtual)For Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR

revised on 19.01.2019 declaring income of Rs.7,81,320/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and assessment was completed by the Faceless Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) read with sections 143(3A) and 143(3B) of the Act on 11.12.2020, accepting the returned income without making any addition or disallowance. 5. On examination of assessment records

PARVEEN KUMAR,229,VILLAGE MANAKPUR-II,TEHSIL JAGADHRI,HARYANA vs. PRABHJOT KAUR,PCIT PANCHKULA, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

ITA 576/CHANDI/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 Feb 2026AY 2018-2019

Bench: the Tribunal as pointed out by the Registry. Considering that the issue involved is purely legal in nature, and respectfully following the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Collector, Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji & Others [(1987) 167 ITR 471 (SC)], which emphasizes that substantial justice should prevail over technical considerations, we condone the delay in filing these appeals.3. We shall take appeal of the assessee in ITA No. 167/Chd/2023 for A.Y 2018-19 as a lead case f

For Appellant: Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, C.A (Virtual)For Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR

revised on 19.01.2019 declaring income of Rs.7,81,320/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and assessment was completed by the Faceless Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) read with sections 143(3A) and 143(3B) of the Act on 11.12.2020, accepting the returned income without making any addition or disallowance. 5. On examination of assessment records

MUNISH KUMAR LEGAL HEIR LATE SH GURDEEP SINGH,VILL MANAKPUR, YAMUNANAGAR vs. ITO, WARD 5, YAMUNANAGAR

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

ITA 754/CHANDI/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, C.A (Virtual)For Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR

revised on 19.01.2019 declaring income of Rs.7,81,320/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and assessment was completed by the Faceless Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) read with sections 143(3A) and 143(3B) of the Act on 11.12.2020, accepting the returned income without making any addition or disallowance. 5. On examination of assessment records

KARTAR SINGH, FATEHABAD vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ROHTAK

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

ITA 335/CHANDI/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, C.A (Virtual)For Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR

revised on 19.01.2019 declaring income of Rs.7,81,320/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and assessment was completed by the Faceless Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) read with sections 143(3A) and 143(3B) of the Act on 11.12.2020, accepting the returned income without making any addition or disallowance. 5. On examination of assessment records

RAM NIWAS,FATEHABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX OFFICE, SIRSA ROAD, INDUSTRIAL AREA, FATEHABAD

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

ITA 498/CHANDI/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, C.A (Virtual)For Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR

revised on 19.01.2019 declaring income of Rs.7,81,320/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and assessment was completed by the Faceless Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) read with sections 143(3A) and 143(3B) of the Act on 11.12.2020, accepting the returned income without making any addition or disallowance. 5. On examination of assessment records

RAKESH KUMAR,JAGADHRI vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANCHKULA

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

ITA 456/CHANDI/2024[2015-16 ]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 Feb 2026

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, C.A (Virtual)For Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR

revised on 19.01.2019 declaring income of Rs.7,81,320/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and assessment was completed by the Faceless Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) read with sections 143(3A) and 143(3B) of the Act on 11.12.2020, accepting the returned income without making any addition or disallowance. 5. On examination of assessment records

SH. DEVENDER KUMAR,YAMUNA NAGAR vs. ITO, WARD -1, YAMUNA NAGAR

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

ITA 192/CHANDI/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, C.A (Virtual)For Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR

revised on 19.01.2019 declaring income of Rs.7,81,320/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and assessment was completed by the Faceless Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) read with sections 143(3A) and 143(3B) of the Act on 11.12.2020, accepting the returned income without making any addition or disallowance. 5. On examination of assessment records

ANIL TUTEJA,FATEHABAD vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ROHTAK, ROHTAK

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

ITA 780/CHANDI/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: BEFORE: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, C.A (Virtual)For Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR

revised on 19.01.2019 declaring income of Rs.7,81,320/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and assessment was completed by the Faceless Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) read with sections 143(3A) and 143(3B) of the Act on 11.12.2020, accepting the returned income without making any addition or disallowance. 5. On examination of assessment records

ASHOK KUMAR THAKRAL,JAGADHRI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANCHKULA , PANCHKULA

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

ITA 455/CHANDI/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 Feb 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: the Tribunal as pointed out by the Registry. Considering that the issue involved is purely legal in nature, and respectfully following the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Collector, Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji & Others [(1987) 167 ITR 471 (SC)], which emphasizes that substantial justice should prevail over technical considerations, we condone the delay in filing these appeals.3. We shall take appeal of the assessee in ITA No. 167/Chd/2023 for A.Y 2018-19 as a lead case f

For Appellant: Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, C.A (Virtual)For Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR

revised on 19.01.2019 declaring income of Rs.7,81,320/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and assessment was completed by the Faceless Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) read with sections 143(3A) and 143(3B) of the Act on 11.12.2020, accepting the returned income without making any addition or disallowance. 5. On examination of assessment records

MADHU GREWAL,CHANDIGARH vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH-1, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

ITA 603/CHANDI/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 Feb 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: the Tribunal as pointed out by the Registry. Considering that the issue involved is purely legal in nature, and respectfully following the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Collector, Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji & Others [(1987) 167 ITR 471 (SC)], which emphasizes that substantial justice should prevail over technical considerations, we condone the delay in filing these appeals.3. We shall take appeal of the assessee in ITA No. 167/Chd/2023 for A.Y 2018-19 as a lead case f

For Appellant: Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, C.A (Virtual)For Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR

revised on 19.01.2019 declaring income of Rs.7,81,320/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and assessment was completed by the Faceless Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) read with sections 143(3A) and 143(3B) of the Act on 11.12.2020, accepting the returned income without making any addition or disallowance. 5. On examination of assessment records

KARAN PRATAP SINGH,SIRSA, HARYANA vs. ITO, WARD-1, SIRSA, HARYANA

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the respective assessee’s are dismissed

ITA 761/CHANDI/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, C.A (Virtual)For Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR

revised on 19.01.2019 declaring income of Rs.7,81,320/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and assessment was completed by the Faceless Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) read with sections 143(3A) and 143(3B) of the Act on 11.12.2020, accepting the returned income without making any addition or disallowance. 5. On examination of assessment records

SHRI RAJEEV GOYAL,SIRSA vs. PR.CIT, ROHTAK

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 149/CHANDI/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh19 Jan 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Vikram Singh Yadavआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.149/Chd/2021 "नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year :2016-17 Sh. Rajeev Goyal Pr. Commissioner Of Income बनाम M/S R.K. Associates, Tax, Rohtak B.G. Complex Near Ganesh Dharam Kanta, Sirsa -125055, Haryana "थायीलेखासं./Pan No: Aibpg7289A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 143(3)Section 263

revise each and every order and, is not a substitute to the precondition u/s 263(1) of the Act. Reliance was placed on the following judgments: i) 70 taxmann.com 227 (Mum) Narayan Tatu Rane v. ITO ii) ITA No. 3391/Del/2018 Arun Kumar Garg HUF v. PCIT 5.10 It was, therefore, prayed that order made u/s 263 of the Act dated

M/S PARDEEP ISPAT(P) LTD.,SIRSA vs. PR.CIT, ROHTAK

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 150/CHANDI/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh19 Jan 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Vikram Singh Yadavआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.149/Chd/2021 "नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year :2016-17 Sh. Rajeev Goyal Pr. Commissioner Of Income बनाम M/S R.K. Associates, Tax, Rohtak B.G. Complex Near Ganesh Dharam Kanta, Sirsa -125055, Haryana "थायीलेखासं./Pan No: Aibpg7289A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 143(3)Section 263

revise each and every order and, is not a substitute to the precondition u/s 263(1) of the Act. Reliance was placed on the following judgments: i) 70 taxmann.com 227 (Mum) Narayan Tatu Rane v. ITO ii) ITA No. 3391/Del/2018 Arun Kumar Garg HUF v. PCIT 5.10 It was, therefore, prayed that order made u/s 263 of the Act dated