BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “depreciation”+ Section 80Pclear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore55Delhi43Visakhapatnam32Chennai24Hyderabad21Surat21Pune18Mumbai18Ahmedabad17Kolkata13Jaipur13Cochin10Jodhpur8Karnataka8Chandigarh7Rajkot6Nagpur4Indore3Allahabad2Lucknow2Panaji2SC2Patna1

Key Topics

Section 14A18Section 80P(2)(d)13Section 80P11Section 143(3)7Addition to Income7Deduction6Depreciation6Disallowance6Section 244Section 263

NAHAR POLY FILMS LIMITED,LUDHIANA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, LUDHIANA

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 458/CHANDI/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh19 Aug 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Dr Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 458/Chd/2023 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2015-2016 Nahar Poly Films Limited, Vs. The Dcit, बनाम 375, Industrial Area-A, Circle-1, Ludhiana 141003 Aayakar Bhawan, Rishi Nagar, Ludhiana "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aaacn5708K अपीलाथ"/ Appellant ""यथ"/ Repsondent ( Physical Hearing ) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Sh. Navdeep Sharma, Advocate राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue By : Smt. Kusum Bansal, Cit Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 29.05.2024 उदघोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 19.08.2024 आदेश/Order Per Dr. Krinwant Sahay, A.M.:

For Appellant: Sh. Navdeep Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT DR
Section 14Section 14A

depreciation is also to be restricted to be 50%. The AO was therefore correct in his stand. Appellant's appeal is dismissed”. The ld. Counsel of the Assessee submitted that this issue is 20. squarely covered by the order of the Chandigarh Bench in the case of sister concern ‘M/s Nahar Industrial Enterprises Ltd. vs. The Addl

2
Section 1442

SHRI BALBIR SINGH VERMA,SHIMLA vs. PR.CIT, SHIMLA

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 314/CHANDI/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh14 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Sharma, CIT DR (Virtual)
Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 24Section 263Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)

depreciation, maintenance costs, and insurance for vehicles, one of which was a Toyota Fortuner. The AO suspected that the vehicles might have been used partly for personal purposes and not entirely for business. As a result, and in line with decisions made in previous years, the AO disallowed an amount of Rs.60,000 on an ad-hoc basis from

THE PUNJAB STATE COOPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS FEDERATION LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-4(1), CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

In the result, ground no. 2 of assessee’s appeal in ITA No

ITA 559/CHANDI/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh12 Aug 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Parveen Jindal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

section 14A r.w.r.8D in respect of interest income received by the assessee from other co-operative societies which is wholly deductible u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act particularly considering the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Kribhco (2012) 349 ITR 618 (Delhi) wherein it was held that no disallowance could

THE PUNJAB STATE COOPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS FEDERATION LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, FATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI, DELHI

In the result, ground no. 2 of assessee’s appeal in ITA No

ITA 562/CHANDI/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh12 Aug 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Parveen Jindal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

section 14A r.w.r.8D in respect of interest income received by the assessee from other co-operative societies which is wholly deductible u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act particularly considering the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Kribhco (2012) 349 ITR 618 (Delhi) wherein it was held that no disallowance could

THE PUNJAB STATE COOPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS FEDERATION LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-4(1), CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

In the result, ground no. 2 of assessee’s appeal in ITA No

ITA 558/CHANDI/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh12 Aug 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Parveen Jindal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

section 14A r.w.r.8D in respect of interest income received by the assessee from other co-operative societies which is wholly deductible u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act particularly considering the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Kribhco (2012) 349 ITR 618 (Delhi) wherein it was held that no disallowance could

M/S CHALAKI PRIMARY CO-OPERATIVE MILK PRODUCER SOCIETY LTD.,MORINDA vs. ITO, W2(4), ROPAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1537/CHANDI/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh19 Aug 2019AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri Neeraj Arora, CAFor Respondent: Shri Manjit Singh, CIT
Section 144Section 68Section 80P

Depreciation and Diesel expenditure. 3. That the learned CIT(A)-1, Chandigarh, was not justified to dismiss the second ground of appeal regarding disallowance of deduction u/s 80P on Interest Income of Rs. 3,208/- 4. That the learned CIT(A)-1, Chandigarh, was not justified to dismiss the third ground of appeal regarding deduction

M/S PUNJAB STATE COOP MILK PRODUCERS FEDERATION LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. ACIT, C-4(1), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 459/CHANDI/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh17 Dec 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Us Relates To Whether The A.O. In Remand Proceedings Could Have Enhanced The Disallowance Made Earlier & The Ground Raised By The Assessee Reads As Under:

For Appellant: Shri Amitoz Singh, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ashish Gupta, CIT DR
Section 14ASection 250(6)Section 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(d)

80P of the ACT, computed by the AO, which was more than that disallowed in the original proceedings was permissible as per law. The contention of the Ld.Counsel for the assessee is that the ITAT having no power of enhancement u/s 254 of the Act, the AO could not have enhanced the amount of disallowance pursuant to direction