BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “depreciation”+ Section 65Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai24Delhi20Chandigarh10Bangalore5Indore1

Key Topics

Section 250(6)2Section 143(3)2Section 65B2Unexplained Investment2Depreciation2Disallowance2Addition to Income2

LAKHVIR KAUR,MOHALI, CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT/ACIT(CEN)-2 CHD, CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the above appeals of the Assessee are\nallowed

ITA 1164/CHANDI/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh10 Sept 2025AY 2020-21
For Appellant: \nShri Rohit Kapoor, Advocate &For Respondent: \nShri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 65B

section 65B of\nIndian Evidence Act, 1872 (Indian Evidence Act) is bad in law.\n3. That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law,\nthe\nCIT(A) has erred in confirming the addition to the tune of Rs.\n1,49,00,000/- made by the AO on account of ON MONEY in respect\nof cash receipts

LAKHVIR KAUR,MOHALI vs. DCIT/ACIT(CEN)-2, CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the above appeals of the Assessee are\nallowed

ITA 1165/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh10 Sept 2025AY 2021-22
For Appellant: \nShri Rohit Kapoor, Advocate &For Respondent: \nShri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 65B

section 65B of\nIndian Evidence Act, 1872 (Indian Evidence Act) is bad in law.\n3. That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law,\nthe\nCIT(A) has erred in confirming the addition to the tune of Rs.\n1,49,00,000/- made by the AO on account of ON MONEY in respect\nof cash receipts

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATIALA vs. DSG PAPERS PVT. LTD., PATIALA

In the result, respective appeals are disposed off in light of aforesaid\ndirection

ITA 761/CHANDI/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Feb 2025AY 2019-20

Section 65B of the\nIndian Evidence Act, 1872.\n25. It was argued before us that this ground being legal ground and the\nsame was also before the Ld. CIT(A) was filed, for which, the detailed\nsubmissions was filed at para 14 page 47, of his order and then further,\nsubmissions were also made, at page

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATIALA vs. DSG PAPERS PVT. LTD., PATIALA

In the result, respective appeals are disposed off in light of aforesaid\ndirection

ITA 764/CHANDI/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Feb 2025AY 2016-17

Section 65B of the\nIndian Evidence Act, 1872.\"\n\n25. It was argued before us that this ground being legal ground and the\nsame was also before the Ld. CIT(A) was filed, for which, the detailed\nsubmissions was filed at para 14 page 47, of his order and then further,\nsubmissions were also made, at page

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATIALA vs. DSG PAPERS PVT. LTD., PATIALA

In the result, respective appeals are disposed off in light of aforesaid direction

ITA 760/CHANDI/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Feb 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.” 25. It was argued before us that this ground being legal ground and the same was also before the Ld. CIT(A) was filed, for which, the detailed submissions was filed at para 14 page 47, of his order and then further, submissions were also made, at page

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATIALA vs. DSG PAPERS PVT. LTD., PATIALA

In the result, respective appeals are disposed off in light of aforesaid direction

ITA 18/CHANDI/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Feb 2025AY 2020-21

Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.\"\n\n25. It was argued before us that this ground being legal ground and the same was also before the Ld. CIT(A) was filed, for which, the detailed submissions was filed at para 14 page 47, of his order and then further, submissions were also made, at page

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATIALA vs. DSG PAPERS PVT. LTD., PATIALA

In the result, respective appeals are disposed off in light of aforesaid\ndirection

ITA 766/CHANDI/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Feb 2025AY 2015-16

Section 65B of the\nIndian Evidence Act, 1872.\"\n25. It was argued before us that this ground being legal ground and the\nsame was also before the Ld. CIT(A) was filed, for which, the detailed\nsubmissions was filed at para 14 page 47, of his order and then further,\nsubmissions were also made, at page

DSG PAPERS PVT LTD #6, GREEN VIEW COLONY,PATIALA vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE PATIALA, PATIALA

In the result, respective appeals are disposed off in light of aforesaid\ndirection

ITA 788/CHANDI/2023[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Feb 2025AY 2020-2021

Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.\"\n25. It was argued before us that this ground being legal ground and the same was also before the Ld. CIT(A) was filed, for which, the detailed submissions was filed at para 14 page 47, of his order and then further, submissions were also made, at page

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, PATIALA, PATIALA vs. DSG PAPERS PVT. LTD., PATIALA

In the result, respective appeals are disposed off in light of aforesaid\ndirection

ITA 765/CHANDI/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Section 65B of the\nIndian Evidence Act, 1872.\"\n25. It was argued before us that this ground being legal ground and the\nsame was also before the Ld. CIT(A) was filed, for which, the detailed\nsubmissions was filed at para 14 page 47, of his order and then further,\nsubmissions were also made, at page

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATIALA vs. DSG PAPERS PVT. LTD., PATIALA

In the result, respective appeals are disposed off in light of aforesaid\ndirection

ITA 768/CHANDI/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Feb 2025AY 2014-15

Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.\"\n25. It was argued before us that this ground being legal ground and the same was also before the Ld. CIT(A) was filed, for which, the detailed submissions was filed at para 14 page 47, of his order and then further, submissions were also made, at page