BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “depreciation”+ Section 50Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai155Delhi75Ahmedabad24Kolkata21Pune15Jaipur13Bangalore10Guwahati9Chandigarh9Hyderabad9Indore9Chennai8Raipur7Lucknow5Jodhpur4Visakhapatnam3Amritsar3Rajkot2Surat2Nagpur1Cochin1Telangana1Agra1

Key Topics

Addition to Income9Limitation/Time-bar8Section 50C3

SAHIBZADA TIMBER AND PLY PRIVATE LIMITED ,MOHALI vs. DCIT, ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 699/CHANDI/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh19 Feb 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 699/Chd/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2019-20 M/s Sahibzada Timber & Ply Private Limited B41-42, Phase-3, Indl. Aera, SAS Nagar Mohali, Punjab बनाम The DCIT Central Circle-2 Chandigarh स्थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAQCS2239G अपीलार्थी/Appellant प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent निर्धारिती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Mohit Dhiman, C.A राजस्व की ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr. DR Shri Dharam Vir, Addl. CIT, Sr.DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of He

For Appellant: Shri Mohit Dhiman, C.AFor Respondent: Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr. DR
Section 250(6)Section 50C

50C doesn’t help the case of the assessee. At the same time, it is noted that the AO has referred to another comparative sale transaction executed by the assessee (plot of same size bearing no. 150, JLPL, Sector-94, Mohali) vide registered sale deed dated 15.11.2018 for stated consideration of Rs. 60,75,000/- and held that the full

M/S AJAY KUMAR SOOD ENGINEERS & CONTRACTORS,SHIMLA vs. DCIT, CHANDIGARH

The appeal of the Revenue is hereby dismissed

ITA 323/CHANDI/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh13 Jun 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri. Sudhir SehgalFor Respondent: Sh. Manjit Singh

depreciation. 6.5 In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case the addition made by the Assessing Officer is liable to be deleted. 7. Ground No. 6 relates to addition of Rs. 1,72,20,000/- on account of land deal. 7.1 During the search, a sale deed dt. 31/08/2009 entered between the assessee and one Smt. Pavit

M/S AJAY KUMAR SOOD ENGINEERS & CONTRACTORS,SHIMLA vs. DCIT, CHANDIGARH

The appeal of the Revenue is hereby dismissed

ITA 322/CHANDI/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh13 Jun 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri. Sudhir SehgalFor Respondent: Sh. Manjit Singh

depreciation. 6.5 In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case the addition made by the Assessing Officer is liable to be deleted. 7. Ground No. 6 relates to addition of Rs. 1,72,20,000/- on account of land deal. 7.1 During the search, a sale deed dt. 31/08/2009 entered between the assessee and one Smt. Pavit

M/S AJAY KUMAR SOOD ENGINEERS & CONTRACTORS,SHIMLA vs. DCIT, CHANDIGARH

The appeal of the Revenue is hereby dismissed

ITA 325/CHANDI/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh13 Jun 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri. Sudhir SehgalFor Respondent: Sh. Manjit Singh

depreciation. 6.5 In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case the addition made by the Assessing Officer is liable to be deleted. 7. Ground No. 6 relates to addition of Rs. 1,72,20,000/- on account of land deal. 7.1 During the search, a sale deed dt. 31/08/2009 entered between the assessee and one Smt. Pavit

M/S AJAY KUMAR SOOD ENGINEERS & CONTRACTORS,SHIMLA vs. DCIT, CHANDIGARH

The appeal of the Revenue is hereby dismissed

ITA 319/CHANDI/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh13 Jun 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri. Sudhir SehgalFor Respondent: Sh. Manjit Singh

depreciation. 6.5 In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case the addition made by the Assessing Officer is liable to be deleted. 7. Ground No. 6 relates to addition of Rs. 1,72,20,000/- on account of land deal. 7.1 During the search, a sale deed dt. 31/08/2009 entered between the assessee and one Smt. Pavit

DCIT, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S AJAY KUMAR SOOD ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS, SHIMLA

The appeal of the Revenue is hereby dismissed

ITA 345/CHANDI/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh13 Jun 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri. Sudhir SehgalFor Respondent: Sh. Manjit Singh

depreciation. 6.5 In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case the addition made by the Assessing Officer is liable to be deleted. 7. Ground No. 6 relates to addition of Rs. 1,72,20,000/- on account of land deal. 7.1 During the search, a sale deed dt. 31/08/2009 entered between the assessee and one Smt. Pavit

M/S AJAY KUMAR SOOD ENGINEERS & CONTRACTORS,SHIMLA vs. DCIT, CHANDIGARH

The appeal of the Revenue is hereby dismissed

ITA 320/CHANDI/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh13 Jun 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri. Sudhir SehgalFor Respondent: Sh. Manjit Singh

depreciation. 6.5 In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case the addition made by the Assessing Officer is liable to be deleted. 7. Ground No. 6 relates to addition of Rs. 1,72,20,000/- on account of land deal. 7.1 During the search, a sale deed dt. 31/08/2009 entered between the assessee and one Smt. Pavit

M/S AJAY KUMAR SOOD ENGINEERS & CONTRACTORS,SHIMLA vs. DCIT, CHANDIGARH

The appeal of the Revenue is hereby dismissed

ITA 321/CHANDI/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh13 Jun 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri. Sudhir SehgalFor Respondent: Sh. Manjit Singh

depreciation. 6.5 In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case the addition made by the Assessing Officer is liable to be deleted. 7. Ground No. 6 relates to addition of Rs. 1,72,20,000/- on account of land deal. 7.1 During the search, a sale deed dt. 31/08/2009 entered between the assessee and one Smt. Pavit

SH. AJAY GOEL,SHIMLA vs. DCIT, CHANDIGARH

The appeal of the Revenue is hereby dismissed

ITA 137/CHANDI/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh13 Jun 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri. Sudhir SehgalFor Respondent: Sh. Manjit Singh

depreciation. 6.5 In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case the addition made by the Assessing Officer is liable to be deleted. 7. Ground No. 6 relates to addition of Rs. 1,72,20,000/- on account of land deal. 7.1 During the search, a sale deed dt. 31/08/2009 entered between the assessee and one Smt. Pavit