BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

58 results for “depreciation”+ Section 271(1)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai878Delhi870Ahmedabad259Bangalore181Chennai104Kolkata86Jaipur81Pune72Chandigarh58Hyderabad56Raipur50Indore35Surat32Lucknow26Visakhapatnam24Amritsar20SC11Nagpur9Rajkot8Cochin7Guwahati6Dehradun6Karnataka6Telangana6Agra6Patna5Ranchi5Allahabad4Cuttack4Jodhpur4Varanasi4Panaji2Jabalpur2S. B. SINHA MARKANDEY KATJU1D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Calcutta1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 80I36Section 27124Section 271(1)(c)24Addition to Income23Depreciation22Disallowance21Deduction21Section 8017Penalty17Section 143(3)

SH RAMESH KUMAR DUDANI,MOHALI vs. DCIT,CIRCLE -6(1), MOHALI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 1146/CHANDI/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh15 Oct 2020AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Nalin K. Nohria, C.A Shri B.K. Nohria, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Rishi Kumar, ACIT
Section 154Section 246ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

depreciation and Rs. 1,40,955/- on account of disallowance of Foreign Travelling Expenses. Out of the aforesaid additions, the addition of Rs. 3,15,213/- was deleted by the Ld. CIT(A) vide order dt. 24/10/2016 in Appeal No. 149/2014- 15 and the A.O. herself dropped the penalty on the addition of Rs. 1,40,955/-, the only addition

Showing 1–20 of 58 · Page 1 of 3

16
Section 234B10
Survey u/s 133A10

DCIT, CHANDIGARH vs. CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 102/CHANDI/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh23 Jul 2021AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri A.K. Jindal, CA &For Respondent: Smt.C. Chandrakanta, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

B) such person offers an explanation which he is not able to substantiate and fails to prove that such explanation is bona fide and that all the facts relating to the same and material to the computation of his total income have been disclosed by him, then, the amount added or disallowed in computing the total income of such person

M/S COLOUR COTTEX PVT. LTD.,LUDHIANA vs. ITO, W-5(2), LUDHIANA

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 1715/CHANDI/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh22 Oct 2018AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri. B.M. Monga, Shri. Rohit KauraFor Respondent: Shri. Manjit Singh
Section 143(3)Section 271Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 37(1)

B”, CHANDIGARH "ी संजय गग", "याय"क सद"य एवं डा. बी.आर.आर, कुमार, लेखा सद"य BEFORE: Sh. SANJAY GARG, JM & DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA NO. 1715/Chd/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2014-15 M/s Colour Cottex Pvt. Ltd. The ITO बनाम 536/21, D/6A, Industrial Area-C Ward-5(1) Dhandari Kalan, Ludhiana Ludhiana "थायी

DCIT, C-1 (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH vs. THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS SOCIETY, LUDHIANA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 52/CHANDI/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh14 May 2025AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(3)Section 143(3)

b) if any land, building or other property\" of the trust or institution is,\nor continues to be, made available for the use of any person referred to in\nsub-section (3), for any period during the previous year without charging\nadequate rent or other compensation;\n(c) if any amount is paid by way of salary, allowance or otherwise

M/S PAGRO FROZEN FOODS PVT. LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. ITO, W-2(3), CHANDIGARH

The appeal of the Assessee is dismissed

ITA 1076/CHANDI/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh31 Jul 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vineet Krishan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Dharam Vir, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 253

271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act is being initiated separately for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. 25. The Assessee feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the AO’s order dt. 26/12/2016 had filed first appeal before Ld. CIT(A) who vide impugned order has dismissed the same. The core finding of CIT(A) is as follows: “4.3 I have carefully

SHRI BALBIR SINGH VERMA,SHIMLA vs. PR.CIT, SHIMLA

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 314/CHANDI/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh14 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Sharma, CIT DR (Virtual)
Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 24Section 263Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)

b) of the Act. 3.3 The Ld. AO stated that, upon analysis, it was found that the loans taken from Allahabad Bank under the 'AL Bank Rent Scheme' and from UCO Bank under the 'UCO Rent Scheme' were utilized for business or personal purposes, rather than for the acquisition or construction of property. Additionally, no certificate was submitted in support

M/S MRS. BECTOR FOOD SPECIALITIES LTD.,LUDHIANA vs. DCIT, LUDHIANA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 488/CHANDI/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh16 Jul 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2006-07

For Appellant: Shri. Subhash AggarwalFor Respondent: Shri. Yoginder Mittal
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)

B-XXXIII/ 324, G.T. Road Circle-III (West), Ludhiana Ludhiana PAN No. AABCM9495K (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri. Subhash Aggarwal Respondent By : Shri. Yoginder Mittal Date of hearing : 11/07/2018 Date of Pronouncement : 16/07/2018 ORDER PER DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, A.M: The present appeal has been filed by the Assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-1, Ludhiana dt. 16/01/2017

ACIT,CIRCLE PANCHKULA, PANCHKULA vs. M/S V.K.SOOD ENGINEERS & CONTRACTOR, PANCHKULA

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 79/CHANDI/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh19 Jan 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri R.L Negiआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 79/Chd/2020 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 बनाम The Acit, M/S V.K. Sood Engineers & Circle, Panchkula Contractor Ddsjv, Unit-Iii, H.No. 20, Sector-6 Panchkula-134109, Haryana "थायीलेखासं./Pan No: Aagfv0584J अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Vineet Krishan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ashok Khanna, Addl. CIT
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)

B”,CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI N.K. SAINI, VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI R.L NEGI, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./ITA No. 79/CHD/2020 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 बनाम The ACIT, M/s V.K. Sood Engineers & Circle, Panchkula Contractor DDSJV, Unit-III, H.No. 20, Sector-6 Panchkula-134109, Haryana "थायीलेखासं./PAN NO: AAGFV0584J अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Hearing through video Conferencing िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे/Assessee

M/S CORE METAL KRAFTS LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. ACIT, C-5(1), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 347/CHANDI/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh04 Oct 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Us.

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvFor Respondent: Smt.Meenakshi Vohra, Addl. CIT
Section 250(6)Section 271Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 43B

271(1)(c) states that where in respect of any facts material to the computation of income the assessee does not offer an explanation or offers a false explanation or offers an explanation which is unable to substantiate and prove that it is bonafide, then the amount added or disallowed in computing the total income as a result thereof shall

M/S IOL CHEMICALS AND PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.,LUDHIANA vs. ADDL. CIT, R-I, LUDHIANA

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1419/CHANDI/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh10 Jun 2021AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Ashwani Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Smt. C. Chandrakanta, CIT
Section 115JSection 250(6)Section 36Section 36(1)(iii)Section 41(1)

section 36(1)(iii) of the Act which was worked out @13% on Rs. 2,06,24,284/- 5. Being aggrieved the assessee carried the matter to the Ld. CIT(A) and submitted as under: GROUND No. 1 Disallowance of interest u/s 36(1)(iii) Regarding the disallowance of interest u/s 36(l)iii), it is submitted that the debit

M/S ASHA TECHNOLOGIES,SIRMOUR vs. ADDL. CIT, SOLAN

In the result, both the above appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed as aforesaid in respect of impugned orders dt

ITA 388/CHANDI/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh19 Jul 2024AY 2007-08

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Mohan, Sr. Advocate with Shri Aditya Sood, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sarabjeet Singh, CIT, DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 250Section 253Section 80I

1. during survey u./s 133A on 7th & 8th of December, 2009, which was annexurised as A-5. This day book for A.Y. 2007-08 was computerized and ledger and cash books were prepared, copy of which was handed to the assessee for its comments. But it failed to substantiate the same. Explanation furnished by the assessee is not accepted

M/S ASHA TECHNOLOGIES,KALA AMB vs. ITO, SIRMOUR

In the result, both the above appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed as aforesaid in respect of impugned orders dt

ITA 61/CHANDI/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh19 Jul 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Mohan, Sr. Advocate with Shri Aditya Sood, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sarabjeet Singh, CIT, DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 250Section 253Section 80I

1. during survey u./s 133A on 7th & 8th of December, 2009, which was annexurised as A-5. This day book for A.Y. 2007-08 was computerized and ledger and cash books were prepared, copy of which was handed to the assessee for its comments. But it failed to substantiate the same. Explanation furnished by the assessee is not accepted

S.D.S. ELECTRONICS PRIVATE LIMITED,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is, therefore, allowed

ITA 243/CHANDI/2018[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh18 Oct 2018AY 2007-08
For Appellant: Shri Ajay Jain, CAFor Respondent: Shri J.S. Kahlon, Sr. DR
Section 250(6)Section 271(1)(c)Section 80I

B’, CHANDIGARH "ी संजय गग", "याय"क सद"य एवं "ीमती अ"नपणा" ग"ता , लेखा सद"य BEFORE: Sh.SANJAY GARG, JM & SMT.ANNAPURNA GUPTA, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.243/Chd/2018 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2007-08 S.D.S. Electronics Private बनाम The D.C.I.T., Limited, Chandigarh Chandigarh. "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AABCS9990D अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से

SHRI VIJAY KUMAR BATRA,CHANDIGARH vs. ACIT, C-3(1), CHANDIGARH

The appeals of the assessee stand allowed

ITA 120/CHANDI/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh26 Dec 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Guptaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos. 120 & 121/Chd/2019 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2012-13 & 2015-16 Shri Vijay Kumar Batra, The Acit, बनाम Circle 3(1), Prop M/S Adley Foundations, Chandigarh Sco 184, Sector 5,Panchkula Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aejpb0879B अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh K. Khanna, CAFor Respondent: Shri G.S. Phani Kishore, CIT DR
Section 271Section 80Section 80I

B’ CHANDIGARH "ी संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य एवं "ीमती अ"नपूणा" गु"ता, लेखा सद"य BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND Ms. ANNAPURNA GUPTA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA Nos. 120 & 121/CHD/2019 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2012-13 & 2015-16 Shri Vijay Kumar Batra, The ACIT, बनाम Circle 3(1), Prop M/s Adley Foundations, Chandigarh

SHRI VIJAY KUMAR BATRA,CHANDIGARH vs. ACIT, C-3(1), CHANDIGARH

The appeals of the assessee stand allowed

ITA 121/CHANDI/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh26 Dec 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Guptaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos. 120 & 121/Chd/2019 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2012-13 & 2015-16 Shri Vijay Kumar Batra, The Acit, बनाम Circle 3(1), Prop M/S Adley Foundations, Chandigarh Sco 184, Sector 5,Panchkula Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aejpb0879B अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh K. Khanna, CAFor Respondent: Shri G.S. Phani Kishore, CIT DR
Section 271Section 80Section 80I

B’ CHANDIGARH "ी संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य एवं "ीमती अ"नपूणा" गु"ता, लेखा सद"य BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND Ms. ANNAPURNA GUPTA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA Nos. 120 & 121/CHD/2019 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2012-13 & 2015-16 Shri Vijay Kumar Batra, The ACIT, बनाम Circle 3(1), Prop M/s Adley Foundations, Chandigarh

M/S PUNJAB CHEMICALS & CROP. PROTECTION LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. ADDL. CIT, CHANDIGARH

The appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 60/CHANDI/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh23 Jul 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2008-09

For Appellant: Shri. Anil KhannaFor Respondent: Mrs. Mona Mohanty
Section 111ASection 115Section 115JSection 14ASection 234BSection 6(1)(iii)

section 36(1)(iii). This being allowable as business expenditure, the disallowance made on this account be deleted. 2. As per the facts and circumstance of the case and as per the provisions of law, the pispute Resolution Panel has erred in its directions, and the assessing officer has erred in disallowing

PUNJAB CHEMICALS & CROP. PROTECTION LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, CHANDIGARH

The appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 100/CHANDI/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh23 Jul 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2008-09

For Appellant: Shri. Anil KhannaFor Respondent: Mrs. Mona Mohanty
Section 111ASection 115Section 115JSection 14ASection 234BSection 6(1)(iii)

section 36(1)(iii). This being allowable as business expenditure, the disallowance made on this account be deleted. 2. As per the facts and circumstance of the case and as per the provisions of law, the pispute Resolution Panel has erred in its directions, and the assessing officer has erred in disallowing

ITO, WARD-6(1), MOHALI vs. QUARKCITY INDIA PVT. LTD., MOHALI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 266/CHANDI/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh19 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vineet Thakral Advocate And Shri Raman Aggarwal, C.AFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT, DR

B”, CHANDIGARH "ी िव"म िसंह यादव, लेखा सद" एवं "ी परेश म. जोशी, "ाियक सद" BEFORE: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM & SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI, JM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA NO. 258/Chd/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10 The ITO बनाम Quarkcity India Pvt. Ltd. Ward -6(1), Mohali A-40A, Industrial Focal Point, Phase VIII Extn. Mohali-160059 "ायी

ITO, WARD-6(1), MOHALI vs. QUARKCITY INDIA PVT. LTD., MOHALI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 265/CHANDI/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh19 Feb 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vineet Thakral Advocate And Shri Raman Aggarwal, C.AFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT, DR

B”, CHANDIGARH "ी िव"म िसंह यादव, लेखा सद" एवं "ी परेश म. जोशी, "ाियक सद" BEFORE: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM & SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI, JM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA NO. 258/Chd/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10 The ITO बनाम Quarkcity India Pvt. Ltd. Ward -6(1), Mohali A-40A, Industrial Focal Point, Phase VIII Extn. Mohali-160059 "ायी

ITO, WARD-6(1), MOHALI vs. QUARKCITY INDIA PVT. LTD., MPHALI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 259/CHANDI/2023[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh19 Feb 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vineet Thakral Advocate And Shri Raman Aggarwal, C.AFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT, DR

B”, CHANDIGARH "ी िव"म िसंह यादव, लेखा सद" एवं "ी परेश म. जोशी, "ाियक सद" BEFORE: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM & SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI, JM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA NO. 258/Chd/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10 The ITO बनाम Quarkcity India Pvt. Ltd. Ward -6(1), Mohali A-40A, Industrial Focal Point, Phase VIII Extn. Mohali-160059 "ायी