BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “depreciation”+ Section 260Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi390Karnataka127Mumbai81Bangalore47Kolkata43Calcutta35Amritsar33Chennai33Telangana31Kerala18Ahmedabad16SC16Jaipur10Punjab & Haryana9Chandigarh6Pune6Lucknow5Cuttack5Hyderabad5Indore5Orissa4Nagpur2Cochin2Jabalpur2Gauhati2Raipur1Rajasthan1Visakhapatnam1Surat1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Tripura1

Key Topics

Section 1124Section 12A4Section 260a4Exemption4Addition to Income4Section 250(6)2Section 139(1)2Section 142(1)2Section 139(9)2

ACIT, PANCHKULA vs. M/S HARYANA STATE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING BOARD, PANCHKULA

Appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 577/CHANDI/2008[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh22 May 2018AY 2004-05

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2004-05 The Asst. Cit Vs. M/S Haryana State Agricultural Panchkula Circle, Marketing Board, Sector-6 Panchkula Panchkula

For Appellant: Sh. Harish NayyarFor Respondent: Dr. Gulshan Raj
Section 11Section 12ASection 260a

260a of the income tax act, 1961 which (in short, the Act) against the order dated 19.08.2008, Annexure A.3, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench (A), Chandigarh (in short, the Tribunal) in ITA No. 577/CHANDI/2008 for the assessment year 2004-05. On 10.02.2010, this appeal was admitted to consider the following substantial question of law. Whether

Section 1482
Business Income2
Deduction2

DCIT, PANCHKULA vs. M/S HARYANA STATE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING BOARD, PANCHKULA

Appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 614/CHANDI/2011[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh22 May 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2004-05 The Asst. Cit Vs. M/S Haryana State Agricultural Panchkula Circle, Marketing Board, Sector-6 Panchkula Panchkula

For Appellant: Sh. Harish NayyarFor Respondent: Dr. Gulshan Raj
Section 11Section 12ASection 260a

260a of the income tax act, 1961 which (in short, the Act) against the order dated 19.08.2008, Annexure A.3, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench (A), Chandigarh (in short, the Tribunal) in ITA No. 577/CHANDI/2008 for the assessment year 2004-05. On 10.02.2010, this appeal was admitted to consider the following substantial question of law. Whether

DCIT,, PANCHKULA vs. M/S HARYANA STATE AGRICULATURAL MARKETING BOARD,, PANCHKULA

Appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1014/CHANDI/2009[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh22 May 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2004-05 The Asst. Cit Vs. M/S Haryana State Agricultural Panchkula Circle, Marketing Board, Sector-6 Panchkula Panchkula

For Appellant: Sh. Harish NayyarFor Respondent: Dr. Gulshan Raj
Section 11Section 12ASection 260a

260a of the income tax act, 1961 which (in short, the Act) against the order dated 19.08.2008, Annexure A.3, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench (A), Chandigarh (in short, the Tribunal) in ITA No. 577/CHANDI/2008 for the assessment year 2004-05. On 10.02.2010, this appeal was admitted to consider the following substantial question of law. Whether

DCIT,,PANCHKULA vs. M/S. HARYANA STATE AGRICULTURAL, PANCHKULA

Appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 538/CHANDI/2010[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh22 May 2018AY 2003-04

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2004-05 The Asst. Cit Vs. M/S Haryana State Agricultural Panchkula Circle, Marketing Board, Sector-6 Panchkula Panchkula

For Appellant: Sh. Harish NayyarFor Respondent: Dr. Gulshan Raj
Section 11Section 12ASection 260a

260a of the income tax act, 1961 which (in short, the Act) against the order dated 19.08.2008, Annexure A.3, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench (A), Chandigarh (in short, the Tribunal) in ITA No. 577/CHANDI/2008 for the assessment year 2004-05. On 10.02.2010, this appeal was admitted to consider the following substantial question of law. Whether

PUNJAB BEVERAGES PVT. LTD.,PATIALA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE, PATIALA

ITA 438/CHANDI/2018[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh17 Dec 2018AY 2001-02

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Smt.Annapurna Guptaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.438/Chd/2018 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2001-02

For Appellant: Shri Tarandeep Singh, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Ashish Gupta, CIT DR
Section 139(1)Section 139(9)Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 250(6)Section 41(1)

depreciation could only be verified from the copies of the assessment and appellate orders for A.Ys. 1979-80 to 1996-97, which were duly placed before the AO at the time of effecting order under section 143 (3)/254 as also during the remand proceedings directed by this appellate authority for the finalisation of the instant appeal. However

DCIT, CIRCLE, PATIALA vs. M/S PUNJAB BEVERAGES PVT. LTD., PATIALA

ITA 446/CHANDI/2018[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh17 Dec 2018AY 2001-02

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Smt.Annapurna Guptaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.438/Chd/2018 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2001-02

For Appellant: Shri Tarandeep Singh, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Ashish Gupta, CIT DR
Section 139(1)Section 139(9)Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 250(6)Section 41(1)

depreciation could only be verified from the copies of the assessment and appellate orders for A.Ys. 1979-80 to 1996-97, which were duly placed before the AO at the time of effecting order under section 143 (3)/254 as also during the remand proceedings directed by this appellate authority for the finalisation of the instant appeal. However