Search: depreciation

3 results for “depreciation”+ Section 194Hclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai90 Delhi71 Chennai32 Bangalore29 Hyderabad14 Ahmedabad13 Kolkata12 Karnataka8 Indore6 Pune4 Surat3 Allahabad3 Chandigarh3 Jaipur3 Raipur2 Rajkot2 Patna1

Key Topics

Depreciation3 Disallowance3 Addition to Income3 Section 6(1)(iii)2 Section 14A2 Section 111A2 Section 115J2 Section 234B2 Section 1152

M/S CHITTOSHO MOTORS,PATIALA vs. THE ADDL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATIALA

Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 343/CHANDI/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh22 May 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri. Tej Mohan SinghFor Respondent: Smt. Chandrakanta

Section 194H

Depreciation resulting in an addition of Rs. 1,83,363/- which is arbitrary and unjustified. 3. That the Ld. CIT(A) has further erred in upholding the disallowance of Rs. 6,68,601/- being 10% of the expenses as against Rs. 13,37,202/- being 20% of the expenses claimed under the heads Business Promotion, Festival, Staff Welfare, Tea & Cold

M/S PUNJAB CHEMICALS & CROP. PROTECTION LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. ADDL. CIT, CHANDIGARH

The appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

M/S CHITTOSHO MOTORS,PATIALA vs. THE ADDL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATIALA

M/S PUNJAB CHEMICALS & CROP. PROTECTION LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. ADDL. CIT, CHANDIGARH

M/S CHITTOSHO MOTORS,PATIALA vs. THE ADDL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATIALA

M/S PUNJAB CHEMICALS & CROP. PROTECTION LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. ADDL. CIT, CHANDIGARH

PUNJAB CHEMICALS & CROP. PROTECTION LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, CHANDIGARH