Search: depreciation

6 results for “depreciation”+ Section 142Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore8 Hyderabad8 Indore7 Chandigarh6 Mumbai5 Pune4 Delhi4 Surat4 Agra3 Lucknow3 Jodhpur2 Cochin2 Kolkata1 Ahmedabad1 Jaipur1 Chennai1 SC1 Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 696 Section 145(3)6 Addition to Income6 Section 142A3 Section 2713 Section 1443 Section 143(3)3 Section 234A3 Section 69B3 Penalty

KHANNA INFRABUILD PRIVATE LIMITED ,LUDHIANA vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL CIRCLE)-2, LUDHIANA, LUDHIANA

In the result, the ground of appeal is allowed

ITA 668/CHANDI/2023[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh28 Jun 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Sharma, CIT, DR

Section 115BSection 145(3)Section 153ASection 35ASection 69

142A, without there being any incriminating material in hand as well. (ii) The Ld. CIT(A) has referred to some judgements at page 16, but all Such judgement are not applicable due to the recent judgement of the Supreme Court M/s AbhisarBuildwell Pvt. Ltd. as per copy placed at page 27 to 48 and which judgement has again been followed

KHANNA INFRABUILD PRIVATE LIMITED ,LUDHIANA vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL CIRCLE)-2, LUDHIANA, LUDHIANA

KHANNA INFRABUILD PRIVATE LIMITED ,LUDHIANA vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL CIRCLE)-2, LUDHIANA, LUDHIANA

KHANNA INFRABUILD PRIVATE LIMITED 2000-1A, SUKHDEV NAGAR FEROZEPUR ROAD, LUDHIANA,LUDHIANA vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2 LUDHIANA, LUDHIANA

KHANNA INFRABUILD PRIVATE LIMITED ,LUDHIANA vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL CIRCLE)-2 LUDHIANA, LUDHIANA

M/S HOTEL OAK VALLEY RESIDENCY,CHAMBA vs. ITO, BANIKHET

M/S OAK VALLEY RESIDENCY,DALHOUISE vs. ITO, DALHOUSIE AT, BANIKHET

M/S OAK VALLEY RESIDENCY,DALHOUSIE vs. ITO, BANIKHET