BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “depreciation”+ Demonetizationclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi26Chennai13Jaipur12Mumbai9Kolkata7Bangalore7Lucknow7Hyderabad4Surat4Agra3Chandigarh3Pune3Rajkot3Visakhapatnam2Cuttack2Indore2Jodhpur1Patna1Cochin1Raipur1Amritsar1Allahabad1Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 544Section 143(3)2Section 69A2Section 692Addition to Income2

BANGA HOSPITALS PRIVATE LIMITED,MANDI vs. ITO, MANDI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed

ITA 202/CHANDI/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh26 May 2025AY 2017-2018

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Anoop Sharma, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 115BSection 250Section 69Section 69A

demonetization period. It was submitted that detailed books of accounts, cash book entries, pharmacy sales registers, and bifurcation of sales into old and new currency had been duly furnished. The assessee also submitted an explanation that sales were accounted for on a daily basis and the pharmacy operated 24x7, thereby creating a timing mismatch in calculating daily cash flows

PREM SINGH,CHAMBA vs. ACIT CIRCLE PALAMPUR, PALAMPUR

In the result, the appeal for AY 2017-18 stands partly allowed

ITA 947/CHANDI/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh15 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Rajpal Yadav & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 946/Chandi/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16) & 2. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 947/Chandi/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18) Shri Prem Singh Dcit Circle, Palampur बनाम/ The Palace. Chamba Himachal Pradesh - 176061 Vs. Himachal Pradesh – 176310 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aampr-8876-P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Ajay Jain (Ca) – Ld. Ar Revenue By : Shri Bharat Bhushan Garg (Cit) (Virtual) - Ld. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 13-11-2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 13-01-2026 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal () 1. The Assessee Is In Further Appeals Before Us For Assessment Years (Ay) 2015-16 & 2017-18 Which Arises Out Of Separate Orders Of Learned First Appellate Authority. First, We Take Up Appeal For Assessment Year (Ay) 2015-16 Which Arises Out Of An Order Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Nfac [Cit(A)] Dated 22-07-2025 In The Matter Of An Assessment Framed By Ld. Assessing Officer [Ao] U/S 143(3) Of The Act On 29-12-2017. The Assessee Is Aggrieved By Computation Of Capital

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Jain (CA) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Bharat Bhushan Garg (CIT) (Virtual) - Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 48Section 54Section 54F

depreciating the same, the value of the built-up portion in the year 2014 has been determined as Rs.4.28 Lacs. In the said report, a certificate has been issued by valuer as under: - The subject property measuring 19.02 Acres or 8,29,818 sft along with workers quarters & built residential shed of approx. 2000 sft has good potential

JAINSONS AGENCIES,CHANDIGARH vs. ITO, WARD 2(3), CHANDIGARH

The appeal stands allowed

ITA 1219/CHANDI/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh06 Apr 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Rajpal Yadav & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.1219/Chandi/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18) M/S Jainsons Agencies Ito Ward-2(3) बनाम/ Vs. Sco 175-176, Ferozi Building Chandigarh Sector – 17C, Chandigarh - 160017 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aadfj-4648-N (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Sh. Jaspal Sharma (Advocate) – Ld. Ar ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Sh. Vivek Vardhan (Addl. Cit) - Ld. Sr. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 25-03-2026 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 06-04-2026 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal () 1. Aforesaid Appeal By Assessee For Assessment Year (Ay) 2017-18 Arises Out Of An Order Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Nfac [Cit(A)] Dated 26-08-2025 In The Matter Of An Assessment Framed By Ld. Assessing Officer [Ao] U/S 143(3) Of The Act On 27-12-2019. The Sole Grievance Of The Assessee Is Confirmation Of Additions Of Cash Deposit During Demonetization Period For Rs.36.99 Lacs & Confirmation Of Another Addition Of Rs.6.32 Lacs. Having

For Appellant: Sh. Jaspal Sharma (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Sh. Vivek Vardhan (Addl. CIT) - Ld. Sr. DR
Section 143(3)

demonetization period, the return of income of the assessee was scrutinized. The assessee made deposits of Rs.60 Lacs on 10-11-2016 anddeposits of Rs.27 Lacs on 11-11-2016. The assessee explained that it had opened two new retail stores at Elante Mall in the month of May, 2016. The cash sales as made in these stores was partly