BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

13 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 80P(2)(c)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai115Chennai89Pune88Bangalore64Panaji41Cochin33Raipur26Kolkata25Jaipur21Ahmedabad20Nagpur15Chandigarh13Delhi11Hyderabad11Visakhapatnam10Lucknow10Rajkot10Surat9Indore7Jodhpur1SC1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 80P22Section 8015Deduction11Section 143(1)9Section 80A8Section 1477Addition to Income7Section 139(1)6Section 271

THE NANAWAN CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE SOCIETY,HAMIRPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, HAMIRPUR

The appeal stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 953/CHANDI/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh06 Jan 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Tribunal.

For Appellant: Sh. Alok Krishan (CA) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Dr. Ranjit Kaur (Addl. CIT) – Ld. Sr. DR
Section 119Section 139Section 139(1)Section 147Section 148Section 80Section 80ASection 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

Condonation of delay under clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for returns of income claiming deduction u/s 80P of the Act for various assessment years from A Y 2018-19 to AY 2022-23- Reg. Section 80P of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereafter referred to as 'Act') provides for deduction

6
Section 144B6
Penalty6
Condonation of Delay5

THE SWAHALWA CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE SERVICE SOCIETY LTD.,DISTT. HAMIRPUR vs. ITO, WARD HAMIPUR, HAMIRPUR

The appeal stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 886/CHANDI/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh06 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: us.3. I find that the appropriate course of action for the assessee, on the facts of such cases, lies in CBDT Circular No. 13 of 2023 dated 26-07-2023 (F.No.173/2112023-IT A-I) which read as under: -

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Kumar (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Dr. Ranjit Kaur (Addl. CIT) – Ld. Sr. DR
Section 119Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 154Section 80Section 80ASection 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

Condonation of delay under clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for returns of income claiming deduction u/s 80P of the Act for various assessment years from A Y 2018-19 to AY 2022-23- Reg. Section 80P of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereafter referred to as 'Act') provides for deduction

THE DOL COOPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL SERVICE SOCIETY LIMITED,VPO AGHWANI vs. ITO DHARAM SHALA, DHARAMSHALA

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 163/CHANDI/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh16 Oct 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 163/Chd/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 The Dol Cooperative Vs. The Ito, बनाम Dharamshala Agricultural Service Society Limited, Vpo Aghwani, Tehsil Jawalamukhi, Kangra Hp "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aadat6246M अपीलाथ"/ Appellant ""यथ"/ Repsondent ( Physical Hearing ) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Sudhir Sehgal, Advocate राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue By : Shri Vivek Vardhan, Jcit, Sr. Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 13.08.2024 उदघोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 16.10.2024 आदेश/Order Per Krinwant Sahay, A.M.:

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

section 80P of the Income Tax Act 1961, as assessee is providing banking/credit facilities to its members and covered u/s sec 80P(2)(a)(I) without considering the facts of the case which is highly arbitrary, illegal, unwarranted & uncalled for. 3) That the assessee has filed rectification but same are rejected, copy of rectification made are enclosed. 4) That

THE CHAPLAH CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL SERVICE SOCIETY LTD,VPO CHOULI vs. LD. DCIT , CPC, CPC, BENGALURU

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 47/CHANDI/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh04 Oct 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: The Tribunal Against The Order Dt 25.04.2023 Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi.

For Appellant: Shri T C Verma, Advocate and Shri Aditya Sood, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr.DR
Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 249Section 250Section 253Section 3Section 5Section 80P

2. At the outset, it is noted that there is a delay of 208 days in filing the appeal by the Assessee. We note that the Assessee has filed the appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal supported with an affidavit of Shri Rakesh Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Bishan Dass

THE TAL CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE SERVICE SOCIETY LTD.,HAMIRPUR vs. ITO, WARD, HAMIRPUR

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 468/CHANDI/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 Mar 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Patiyal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Dharamvir, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 10ASection 139Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143Section 143(1)Section 80Section 80ASection 80CSection 80P

2. The Assessee filed its return of income declaring total income at NIL after claiming deduction u/s 80P of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short, ‘the I.T. Act’ ) amounting to Rs. 3,50,177/-. The return was processed by the CPC, Bangalore u/s 143(1) of the I.T. Act, denying the deduction claimed u/s 80P. The Assessee filed rectification

PUNJAB AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY,LUDHIANA vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

In the result, Assessee’s appeal for A

ITA 492/CHANDI/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh18 Dec 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Krinwant Sahay & Shri Paresh M. Joshi, Judical Member आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 661/Chd/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Punjab Agriculture University, Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of बनाम Thapar Hall, Income Tax (Exemptions), Ferozepur Road, Chandigarh Ludhiana "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aaabp0216H अपीलाथ"/ Appellant ""यथ"/ Repsondent & आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 492/Chd/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2019-20 Punjab Agriculture University, Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Thapar Hall, बनाम Income Tax (Exemptions), Ferozepur Road, Chandigarh Ludhiana "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aaabp0216H अपीलाथ"/ Appellant ""यथ"/ Repsondent (Hybrid Hearing ) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Sudhir Sehgal, Advocate, राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue By : Smt. Kusum Bansal, Cit Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 09.12.2024 उदघोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 18.12 .2024 आदेश/Order Per Krinwant Sahay, A.M.: The Appeal In These Cases Have Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 09.05.2022 For Assessment Year 2018-19 Order

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT DR

delay of 691 days and 706 days in both the Assessment years i.e., 2018-19 & 2019-20 are condoned. 9. On the merits of the addition, the Assessee has taken following grounds of appeal in assessment year 2018-19: 1. That the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A), NFAC, Delhi has erred in dismissing the appeal of the assessee

PUNJAB AGRICULTUAL UNIVERSITY,LUDHIANA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTIONS, CHANDIGARH

In the result, Assessee’s appeal for A

ITA 661/CHANDI/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh18 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Krinwant Sahay & Shri Paresh M. Joshi, Judical Member आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 661/Chd/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Punjab Agriculture University, Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of बनाम Thapar Hall, Income Tax (Exemptions), Ferozepur Road, Chandigarh Ludhiana "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aaabp0216H अपीलाथ"/ Appellant ""यथ"/ Repsondent & आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 492/Chd/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2019-20 Punjab Agriculture University, Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Thapar Hall, बनाम Income Tax (Exemptions), Ferozepur Road, Chandigarh Ludhiana "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aaabp0216H अपीलाथ"/ Appellant ""यथ"/ Repsondent (Hybrid Hearing ) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Sudhir Sehgal, Advocate, राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue By : Smt. Kusum Bansal, Cit Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 09.12.2024 उदघोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 18.12 .2024 आदेश/Order Per Krinwant Sahay, A.M.: The Appeal In These Cases Have Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 09.05.2022 For Assessment Year 2018-19 Order

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT DR

delay of 691 days and 706 days in both the Assessment years i.e., 2018-19 & 2019-20 are condoned. 9. On the merits of the addition, the Assessee has taken following grounds of appeal in assessment year 2018-19: 1. That the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A), NFAC, Delhi has erred in dismissing the appeal of the assessee

THE SAHA PRIMARY AGRICULTURE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,AMBALA vs. ITO, WARD-4, AMBALA

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the Assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 54/CHANDI/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh29 Aug 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Jaspal Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 144BSection 147Section 271Section 80P

2. All these cases were heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order. 3. During the course of hearing, the Ld. AR submitted that the assessee has filed three appeals against quantum proceedings for assessment years 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17 and three appeals against penalty u/s 271(l)(c) for the same years against

THE SAHA PRIMARY AGRICULTURE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,AMBALA vs. ITO, WARD-4, AMBALA

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the Assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 58/CHANDI/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh29 Aug 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Jaspal Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 144BSection 147Section 271Section 80P

2. All these cases were heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order. 3. During the course of hearing, the Ld. AR submitted that the assessee has filed three appeals against quantum proceedings for assessment years 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17 and three appeals against penalty u/s 271(l)(c) for the same years against

THE SAHA PRIMARY AGRICULTURE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,AMBALA vs. ITO, WARD-4, AMBALA

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the Assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 57/CHANDI/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh29 Aug 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Jaspal Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 144BSection 147Section 271Section 80P

2. All these cases were heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order. 3. During the course of hearing, the Ld. AR submitted that the assessee has filed three appeals against quantum proceedings for assessment years 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17 and three appeals against penalty u/s 271(l)(c) for the same years against

THE SAHA PRIMARY AGRICULTURE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,AMBALA vs. ITO, WARD-4, AMBALA

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the Assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 55/CHANDI/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh29 Aug 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Jaspal Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 144BSection 147Section 271Section 80P

2. All these cases were heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order. 3. During the course of hearing, the Ld. AR submitted that the assessee has filed three appeals against quantum proceedings for assessment years 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17 and three appeals against penalty u/s 271(l)(c) for the same years against

THE SAHA PRIMARY AGRICULTURE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,AMBALA vs. ITO, WARD-4, AMBALA

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the Assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 53/CHANDI/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh29 Aug 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Jaspal Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 144BSection 147Section 271Section 80P

2. All these cases were heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order. 3. During the course of hearing, the Ld. AR submitted that the assessee has filed three appeals against quantum proceedings for assessment years 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17 and three appeals against penalty u/s 271(l)(c) for the same years against

THE SAHA PRIMARY AGRICULTURE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,AMBALA vs. ITO, WARD-4, AMBALA

In the result, all the above appeals filed by the Assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 56/CHANDI/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh29 Aug 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Jaspal Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 144BSection 147Section 271Section 80P

2. All these cases were heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order. 3. During the course of hearing, the Ld. AR submitted that the assessee has filed three appeals against quantum proceedings for assessment years 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17 and three appeals against penalty u/s 271(l)(c) for the same years against