BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 80Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Ahmedabad15Pune10Delhi10Mumbai9Chennai8Cochin8Bangalore8Indore7Surat6Jaipur3Chandigarh3Kolkata2Hyderabad1Amritsar1Raipur1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 12A8Section 103Section 1473Section 12A(2)3Section 37(1)2Section 1482Addition to Income2Exemption2

DCIT, C-1(1) , CHANDIGARH vs. M/S FIDELITY INFORMATION SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD., CHANDIGARH

In the result, the cross-objection filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1328/CHANDI/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh07 Jun 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Kalra, Advocate and Ms. Sumisha, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Sharma, CIT DR
Section 37(1)

delay in filing the cross- objection is condoned and the same is hereby admitted for necessary adjudication. 26. Now, coming to the various grounds of appeal taken by the assessee in its cross-objection so filed, it is noted that the assessee has effectively challenged the action of the AO in levying interest amounting

M/S GENIUS EDUCATION SOCIETY,MANDI vs. ACIT, C-2, (E), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed in

ITA 238/CHANDI/2018[2012-13]Status: Disposed
ITAT Chandigarh
20 Aug 2018
AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Guptam/S Genius Education Society, Vs. The A.C.I.T., Tanda Balt, Sadar, Mandi, Circle-2(Exemptions), Himachal Pradesh. Chandigarh. Pan: Aaajg1473H (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: S/Shri Ajay Jain, CAFor Respondent: Shri Surinder Meena, JCIT
Section 10Section 12ASection 12A(2)Section 147Section 148

section, we find, nowhere prescribes the filing of return by any due date, therefore the findings of the CIT(A) that the assessee having not filed its return within the prescribed time it had failed to comply with the requirement prescribed, is not tenable. As for the requirement of filing report of audit in the prescribed form, the said condition

SANSKRITI KMV SCHOOL ,JALANDHAR vs. ACIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for

ITA 7/CHANDI/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh29 Apr 2021AY 2016-17
For Appellant: Shri Y.K. Sud, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Ashok Khanna, Addl. CIT
Section 10Section 11

condonation of delay in filing Form 10BB pertaining to Asst. Year 2016-17 which was binding on both the authorities. 5. That the order of CIT(A) & AO are against the law and facts of the case. 2. At the time of hearing, ld. AR inviting attention to the impugned order submitted that the reasons prevailing with the ld. Commissioner