HARI YAMUNA SEHYOG SAMITI,HIMACHAL PRADESH vs. ITO NAHAN, HIMACHAL PRADESH
In the result, all the appeals of the Assessee stand allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 1471/CHANDI/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh26 Feb 2026AY 2025-26
Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 1471/Chd/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2025-26 (Us/ 12Aa ) Hari Yamuna Sehyog Samiti, The Ito, बनाम Vikas Walia Building, Nahan Ward No. 7, Main Market, Vs. Paonta Sahib, Solan, Hp 173025 "थायी लेखा सं./ Pan No: Aacah3504R अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 1489/Chd/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2025-26 (Us/ 80G ) Hari Yamuna Sehyog Samiti, The Ito, बनाम Vikas Walia Building, Nahan Ward No. 7, Main Market, Vs. Paonta Sahib, Solan, Hp 173025 "थायी लेखा सं./ Pan No: Aacah3504R अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent & आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 1670/Chd/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2024-25 U/S 80G Hari Yamuna Sehyog Samiti, The Ito, बनाम Vikas Walia Building, Nahan Ward No. 7, Main Market, Vs. Paonta Sahib, Solan, Hp 173025 "थायी लेखा सं./ Pan No: Aacah3504R अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent
For Appellant: Sh. Parikshit Aggarwal, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Manav Bansal, CIT DR
Section 12ASection 80G
delay in filing of the appeal in ITA No.1670/Chd/2025 is hereby condoned and we proceed to decide the appeal on merit.
7. At the outset, ld. Counsel for the Assessee submitted that though the identical grounds raised in the captioned appeals, the foremost grievance of the Assessee is that the Ld. CIT(E), Chandigarh erred in violating the principal