BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 50Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai101Chennai50Hyderabad43Ahmedabad40Pune23Indore19Surat19Kolkata18Delhi18Jaipur16Visakhapatnam15Nagpur13Lucknow13Bangalore10Rajkot6Patna6Jabalpur5Agra4Chandigarh2Varanasi2Raipur1Cuttack1Allahabad1Cochin1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 50C2Section 2632Limitation/Time-bar2

BHUP SINGH KOUNDAL,MANDI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD SHIMLA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for

ITA 751/CHANDI/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh23 Apr 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Mohan, Sr. Advocate, with Shri Parveen Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Addl. CIT, Sr.DR
Section 139(1)Section 148Section 50CSection 50C(2)

condone the delay in filing the appeal and proceed to decide it on merit. A.Y.2010-11 3 5. A perusal of grounds of appeal would reveal that assessee is challenging two additions made to his total income and confirmed by the CIT(A). These additions are : a) Rs.5,39,195/- added on account of unexplained deposits in the bank account

SH. MAHESH CHUGH,CHANDIGARH vs. PR.CIT-2, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 104/CHANDI/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh21 Apr 2022AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri Tejmohan Singh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sarabjeet Singh, CIT-DR
Section 263

delay is, accordingly, condoned. Ordered accordingly. 4. The ld. AR, accordingly, was directed to address the grievance of the assessee in the appeal filed. On behalf of the assessee, it was submitted at the outset that the assessee does not wish to specifically press ground No. 2 as the issue would stand addressed by the other grounds. ITA 104 /CHD/2021